Mozart effect

2005-05-06 Thread Eugene C. Braig IV
I am intensely skeptical of the Mozart effect.  Not so formal as peer 
reviewed article abstracts, but this little online entry sums things up nicely:
http://skepdic.com/mozart.html

Eugene



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Re: Mozart effect

2005-05-06 Thread lute9
 I am intensely skeptical of the Mozart effect.  Not so formal as peer
 reviewed article abstracts, but this little online entry sums things up
 nicely:
 http://skepdic.com/mozart.html
 
 Eugene
So am I. Therefore my twins were (from day 1) subjected to hefty daily doses
of JSB, CPEB, SLW, LvB, Haydn, Brahms, Bruckner and many others, but not
WAM.
RT 



___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Re: Mozart effect

2005-05-06 Thread Thomas Schall
Oh n! 
I doubt any effect of any of those composers. Maybe the music of a certain 
composer or a certain piece tend to affect our senses in a certain way but 
surely this is nothing lasting. 
The good thing is believing in the myst of the whoever-effect brings 
children in contact with good music in early days instead of the ususal 
pop-radio programs

Thomas

Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 16:33 schrieben Sie:
 Therefore my twins were (from day 1) subjected to hefty daily doses
 of JSB, CPEB, SLW, LvB, Haydn, Brahms, Bruckner and many others, but not
 WAM.

-- 
Thomas Schall
Niederhofheimer Weg 3
D-65843 Sulzbach
06196/74519
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Three switched witches watch three swatch watch switches.
Which switched witch watches which swatch watch switch?



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Re: Mozart effect

2005-05-06 Thread lute9
 Oh n!
 I doubt any effect of any of those composers. Maybe the music of a certain
 composer or a certain piece tend to affect our senses in a certain way but
 surely this is nothing lasting.
 The good thing is believing in the myst of the whoever-effect brings
 children in contact with good music in early days instead of the ususal
 pop-radio programs
 Thomas
Actually this had nothing to do with Effect, but rather both my wife and I
much prefer Haydn to Mozart.
RT


 
 Am Freitag, 6. Mai 2005 16:33 schrieben Sie:
 Therefore my twins were (from day 1) subjected to hefty daily doses
 of JSB, CPEB, SLW, LvB, Haydn, Brahms, Bruckner and many others, but not
 WAM.




___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Mozart effect

2005-05-04 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some contributes about the Mozart effect 

Paolo Declich 


Rev Neurol. 2004 Dec 16-31;39(12):1167-73.Related Articles, Links 

  
[Musical perception and cognitive functions. Is there such a thing as the 
Mozart effect?]

[Article in Spanish]

Talero-Gutierrez C, Zarruk-Serrano JG, Espinosa-Bode A.

Universidad Colegio Mayor de Nuestra Senora del Rosario. Facultad de Medicina., 
Bogota, Colombia.

INTRODUCTION. Throughout the second half of the 20th century important advances 
were made in the study of neurobiology related to the processing of music, the 
differences and similarities between the neural pathways involved in language 
and in music, the role played by each hemisphere in recognising these stimuli, 
and the effects that exposure to certain specific pieces of music could have on 
the cognitive functions. DEVELOPMENT. The objective of this study is to review 
the literature concerning music and the central nervous system, bearing in mind 
the above-mentioned aspects. Likewise, we also wanted to analyse the reports 
referring to the Mozart effect and Tomatis, in addition to those dealing with 
formal musical education and its effects. The increased capacity to respond in 
visuospatial-type tasks after exposure to music by Mozart has triggered a 
commercial boom which makes use of isolated data, while the real extent of the 
effect remains unknown. CONCLUSIONS. After revi!
 ewing the scientific literature on this subject, it was found that the effects 
of exposure to music by Mozart (the 'Mozart effect') when they actually 
occurred, were limited to a specific skill that did not last for more than a 
few minutes. Formal musical education, on the other hand, shows more permanent 
positive effects but which can be attributed to the individual attention the 
pupil receives and to the stimulation in basic skills for general learning


Br J Soc Psychol. 2004 Dec;43(Pt 4):605-23.Related Articles, Links 

  
The Mozart effect: tracking the evolution of a scientific legend.

Bangerter A, Heath C.

Department of Psychology, Stanford University, USA. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Theories of the diffusion of ideas in social psychology converge on the 
assumption that shared beliefs (e.g., social representations, rumours and 
legends) propagate because they address the needs or concerns of social groups. 
But little empirical research exists demonstrating this link. We report three 
media studies of the diffusion of a scientific legend as a particular kind of 
shared belief. We studied the Mozart effect (ME), the idea that listening to 
classical music enhances intelligence. Study 1 showed that the ME elicited more 
persistent media attention than other science reports and this attention 
increased when the ME was manifested in events outside of science. Study 2 
suggested that diffusion of the ME may have responded to varying levels of 
collective anxiety. Study 3 demonstrated how the content of the ME evolved 
during diffusion. The results provide evidence for the functionality of 
diffusion of ideas and initial elements for a model of the emergence and 
evoluti!
 on of scientific legends.





Nature 400, 826 - 827 (26 August 1999); doi:10.1038/23608 
 

Prelude or requiem for the 'Mozart effect'?
CHRISTOPHER F. CHABRIS
Department of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, 
USA



Rauscher et al. reported that listening to ten minutes of Mozart's music 
increased the abstract reasoning ability of college students, as measured by IQ 
scores, by 8 or 9 points compared with listening to relaxation instructions or 
silence, respectively. This startling finding became known as the 'Mozart 
effect', and has since been explored by several research groups. Here I use a 
meta-analysis to demonstrate that any cognitive enhancement is small and does 
not reflect any change in IQ or reasoning ability in general, but instead 
derives entirely from performance on one specific type of cognitive task and 
has a simple neuropsychological explanation.

Psychol Sci. 2001 May;12(3):248-51.Related Articles, Links 

  
Arousal, mood, and the Mozart effect.

Thompson WF, Schellenberg EG, Husain G.

Department of Psychology, Atkinson College, York University, Toronto, Ontario, 
Canada. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

The Mozart effect refers to claims that people perform better on tests of 
spatial abilities after listening to music composed by Mozart. We examined 
whether the Mozart effect is a consequence of between-condition differences in 
arousal and mood. Participants completed a test of spatial abilities after 
listening to music or sitting in silence. The music was a Mozart sonata (a 
pleasant and energetic piece) for some participants and an Albinoni adagio (a 
slow, sad piece) for others. We also measured enjoyment, arousal, and mood. 
Performance on tbe spatial task was better following the music than the silence 
condition but only for participants who heard Mozart. The two music selections 
also induced

Fw: Mozart effect is a fraud... (of general interest)

2005-05-01 Thread A.J. Padilla, M.D.

- Original Message - 
From: Mary Feinsinger 
To: Georgina Finch 
Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 11:36 PM
Subject: Fwd: Mozart effect is a fraud...


Subject: Re: Mozart effect is a fraud...

Another Urban Legend

A new report now says that the Mozart effect is a fraud (via Terry Teachout). 
For you hip urban professionals: no, playing Mozart for your designer baby will 
not improve his IQ or help him get into that exclusive pre-school. He'll just 
have to be admitted into Harvard some other way.

Of course, we're all better off for listening to Mozart purely for the pleasure 
of it. However, one wonders that if playing Mozart sonatas for little Hillary 
or Jason could boost their intelligence, what would happen if other composers 
were played in their developmental time?

Liszt effect: Child speaks rapidly and extravagantly, but never really says 
anything important.

Raff effect: Child becomes a bore.

Bruckner effect: Child speaks very slowly and repeats himself frequently. Gains 
reputation for profundity.

Wagner effect: Child becomes a megalomaniac. May eventually marry his sister.

Mahler effect: Child continually screams - at great length and volume - that 
he's dying.

Schoenberg effect: Child never repeats a word until he's used all the other 
words in his vocabulary. Sometimes talks backwards. Eventually, people stop 
listening to him. Child blames them for their inability to understand him.

Babbitt effect: Child gibbers nonsense all the time. Eventually, people stop 
listening to him. Child doesn't care because all his playmate! s think he's 
cool. 

Postscript from Cori Ellison:

Yes! And what about:
 
Schumann Effect - Child elopes with piano teacher's daughter, tries to stretch 
his fingers, and goes crazy.
 
Rossini Effect - Child's speech keeps getting faster, higher, louder, and more 
florid, until he suddenly retires at an early age.
 
Philip Glass Effect - Child refuses to develop themes, keeps repeating himself 
endlessly, and becomes inexplicably popular with drug users.
  


--

To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Re: Mozart effect is a fraud... (of general interest)

2005-05-01 Thread lute9
Should we add some lutenisms?
Gaultier Effect?
Child blabbers euphoniously enough, but makes no sense
Kapsberger Effect:
Child cannot complete a sentence
Baron Effect:
Child is fairly eloquent, but never says anything worth paying attention
to
RT


 A new report now says that the Mozart effect is a fraud (via Terry Teachout).
 For you hip urban professionals: no, playing Mozart for your designer baby
 will not improve his IQ or help him get into that exclusive pre-school. He'll
 just have to be admitted into Harvard some other way.
 
 Of course, we're all better off for listening to Mozart purely for the
 pleasure of it. However, one wonders that if playing Mozart sonatas for little
 Hillary or Jason could boost their intelligence, what would happen if other
 composers were played in their developmental time?
 
 Liszt effect: Child speaks rapidly and extravagantly, but never really says
 anything important.
 
 Raff effect: Child becomes a bore.
 
 Bruckner effect: Child speaks very slowly and repeats himself frequently.
 Gains reputation for profundity.
 
 Wagner effect: Child becomes a megalomaniac. May eventually marry his sister.
 
 Mahler effect: Child continually screams - at great length and volume - that
 he's dying.
 
 Schoenberg effect: Child never repeats a word until he's used all the other
 words in his vocabulary. Sometimes talks backwards. Eventually, people stop
 listening to him. Child blames them for their inability to understand him.
 
 Babbitt effect: Child gibbers nonsense all the time. Eventually, people stop
 listening to him. Child doesn't care because all his playmate! s think he's
 cool. 
 
 Postscript from Cori Ellison:
 
 Yes! And what about:
 
 Schumann Effect - Child elopes with piano teacher's daughter, tries to stretch
 his fingers, and goes crazy.
 
 Rossini Effect - Child's speech keeps getting faster, higher, louder, and more
 florid, until he suddenly retires at an early age.
 
 Philip Glass Effect - Child refuses to develop themes, keeps repeating himself
 endlessly, and becomes inexplicably popular with drug users.
 
 
 
 --
 
 To get on or off this list see list information at
 http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
 



___
$0 Web Hosting with up to 200MB web space, 1000 MB Transfer
10 Personalized POP and Web E-mail Accounts, and much more.
Signup at www.doteasy.com