Re: [lxc-devel] Dropping lxc-checkpoint and lxc-restart

2014-01-16 Thread Qiang Huang
On 2014/1/17 9:19, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> I just noticed that we still have lxc-checkpoint and lxc-restart in the
> upstream branch, as far as I know those two only work with patched
> kernel using a patchset which hasn't been updated in ages.
> 
> I'd recommend we get those two tools out of our codebase for the time
> being and only bring them back to life once we have CRIU support in
> liblxc and can base their replacements on that API.
> 
> Any objections?

No objections at all.
I'd like LXC 1.0 to be right and clean :)

> 
> 
> 
> ___
> lxc-devel mailing list
> lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
> 


___
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel


Re: [lxc-devel] Dropping lxc-checkpoint and lxc-restart

2014-01-16 Thread Ranjib Dey
+1. i was confused by those binaries, as they dont work on mainline. We'll
better solve this with a criu plugin (and may be ship it as a separate
package?)

p.s there are several other file (not binary, but authors, etc) which are
outdated, you think we should update them too?


On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Stéphane Graber wrote:

> I just noticed that we still have lxc-checkpoint and lxc-restart in the
> upstream branch, as far as I know those two only work with patched
> kernel using a patchset which hasn't been updated in ages.
>
> I'd recommend we get those two tools out of our codebase for the time
> being and only bring them back to life once we have CRIU support in
> liblxc and can base their replacements on that API.
>
> Any objections?
>
> --
> Stéphane Graber
> Ubuntu developer
> http://www.ubuntu.com
>
> ___
> lxc-devel mailing list
> lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
>
>
___
lxc-devel mailing list
lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel