Re: [lxc-devel] On the road to LXC 2.0.0
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 05:24:51PM +0100, Christian Brauner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 08:57:36AM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:12:12PM -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > > > Hey everyone, > > > > > > So you may have noticed I just tagged LXC 2.0.0 beta1. > > > > > > The current plan is as follow: > > > - LXC 2.0.0 beta2 next week (28th) > > > - LXC 2.0.0 rc1 the week after (4th) > > > > Can we potentially push this back? I don't have a lot of working days > > between now and the 4th (1.5, to be exact), but would like some time > > to play with 2.0 to make sure it has everything needed for p.haul. > > +1. Would give me more time for lxc-ls and bdev-split. We're about a week behind schedule right now, so planning on beta2 this week and rc1 next week. -- Stéphane Graber Ubuntu developer http://www.ubuntu.com signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
Re: [lxc-devel] On the road to LXC 2.0.0
On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 08:57:36AM -0700, Tycho Andersen wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:12:12PM -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > > > So you may have noticed I just tagged LXC 2.0.0 beta1. > > > > The current plan is as follow: > > - LXC 2.0.0 beta2 next week (28th) > > - LXC 2.0.0 rc1 the week after (4th) > > Can we potentially push this back? I don't have a lot of working days > between now and the 4th (1.5, to be exact), but would like some time > to play with 2.0 to make sure it has everything needed for p.haul. +1. Would give me more time for lxc-ls and bdev-split. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
Re: [lxc-devel] On the road to LXC 2.0.0
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 05:12:12PM -0500, Stéphane Graber wrote: > Hey everyone, > > So you may have noticed I just tagged LXC 2.0.0 beta1. > > The current plan is as follow: > - LXC 2.0.0 beta2 next week (28th) > - LXC 2.0.0 rc1 the week after (4th) Can we potentially push this back? I don't have a lot of working days between now and the 4th (1.5, to be exact), but would like some time to play with 2.0 to make sure it has everything needed for p.haul. Thanks, Tycho ___ lxc-devel mailing list lxc-devel@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-devel
