Re: [lxc-users] is precise-gui special?

2016-03-06 Thread Andrey Repin
Greetings, Mike Wright!

> When it came time to install chrome the google i386 apps

Google is actively trying to kill x86 Chrome on Linux.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Monday, March 7, 2016 00:13:44

Sorry for my terrible english...

___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] is precise-gui special?

2016-03-06 Thread Neil Greenwood
That's actually a Google Chrome change. They've now dropped support for all 
32-bit operating systems. 


Neil 

On 6 March 2016 17:10:38 GMT+00:00, Mike Wright  
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I'm moving through Stéphane Graber's website LXC 1.0 series and am at 
>LXC 1.0: GUI in containers.
>
>When it came time to install chrome the google i386 apps 404'ed but the
>
>64s are still there.
>
>Is there anything in particular that is special about precise-gui or
>can 
>I perform the experiment on any of the available 64bit ubuntu distros?
>
>Thanks,
>Mike Wright
>___
>lxc-users mailing list
>lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
>http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] [solved] is precise-gui special?

2016-03-06 Thread Mike Wright

On 03/06/2016 09:10 AM, Mike Wright wrote:

Hi all,

I'm moving through Stéphane Graber's website LXC 1.0 series and am at
LXC 1.0: GUI in containers.

When it came time to install chrome the google i386 apps 404'ed but the
64s are still there.

Is there anything in particular that is special about precise-gui or can
I perform the experiment on any of the available 64bit ubuntu distros?


And the answer is... yes you can.  There is nothing special about 
precise-gui.


I just installed google-chrome into an unprivileged container running 
Xenial and it came up without a hitch.  Actually it came up faster from 
the lightweight container than it does from my actual Wily desktop.


Great work Stéphane!

Thanks,
Mike Wright

___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] is precise-gui special?

2016-03-06 Thread Mike Wright

Hi all,

I'm moving through Stéphane Graber's website LXC 1.0 series and am at 
LXC 1.0: GUI in containers.


When it came time to install chrome the google i386 apps 404'ed but the 
64s are still there.


Is there anything in particular that is special about precise-gui or can 
I perform the experiment on any of the available 64bit ubuntu distros?


Thanks,
Mike Wright
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] Publishing LXD Images ... is there a public repository yet?

2016-03-06 Thread brian mullan
I forgot to include the link to Serge's writeup from Jun 2015...

https://insights.ubuntu.com/2015/06/30/publishing-lxd-images/

On Sun, Mar 6, 2016 at 8:26 AM, brian mullan  wrote:

> When I read Serge Hallyn's writeup last year I thought it was great that
> LXD/LXC now had this capability to "publish" an image so it could be shared
> publicly.
>
> But then forgot about the article until last week when it dawned on me to
> ask if there already exists a "public repository" that anyone could
> publish/share their LXD/LXC container work to and share with others.
>
> To me this would be the LXD/LXC equiv of the Docker "hub" concept and
> really spur lxd/lxc use.
>
> I did some google searchs but didn't come up with anything related to such
> existing but searches being what they are I could have "asked' wrong.
>
> So I thought I'd ask here on the lxc-user alias.Does this exist?
> Does the existing lxd/lxc image repository have all the capabilities to
> support public publishing of images?
>
> If so...  is there a document that describes how to use it?   By that I
> mean that I would imagine it would have to have some meta (descriptive)
> data available that contributing container authors provide regarding "what"
> their image does, limitations etc?
>
> thanks for any info.
>
> Brian
>
>
>
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

[lxc-users] Publishing LXD Images ... is there a public repository yet?

2016-03-06 Thread brian mullan
When I read Serge Hallyn's writeup last year I thought it was great that
LXD/LXC now had this capability to "publish" an image so it could be shared
publicly.

But then forgot about the article until last week when it dawned on me to
ask if there already exists a "public repository" that anyone could
publish/share their LXD/LXC container work to and share with others.

To me this would be the LXD/LXC equiv of the Docker "hub" concept and
really spur lxd/lxc use.

I did some google searchs but didn't come up with anything related to such
existing but searches being what they are I could have "asked' wrong.

So I thought I'd ask here on the lxc-user alias.Does this exist?   Does
the existing lxd/lxc image repository have all the capabilities to support
public publishing of images?

If so...  is there a document that describes how to use it?   By that I
mean that I would imagine it would have to have some meta (descriptive)
data available that contributing container authors provide regarding "what"
their image does, limitations etc?

thanks for any info.

Brian
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] [SOLVED] problems starting unprivileged container

2016-03-06 Thread Serge Hallyn
Quoting Mike Wright (nob...@nospam.hostisimo.com):
> On 03/05/2016 05:21 PM, Mike Wright wrote:
> >Hi all,
> 
> Several pointers for the next person.
> 
> An error message pointed out that the following...
> 
> lxc.include = /etc/lxc/default.conf
> lxc.id_map = u 0 10 65536
> lxc.id_map = g 0 10 65536
> 
> ...must be added to .config/lxc/default.conf
> 
> (the lxc.include can be replaced by an actual network definition.)
> 
> Apparently ~/.config/lxc/lxc.conf isn't necessary???

lxc.conf is the 'system' configuration file, see lxc.system.conf(5).
You can put cgroup.use there for instance.  default.conf is the
default config to use for newly created containers.  That is
lxc.container.conf(5).
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users