Re: [lxc-users] TTY issue

[Saint Michael]

How do you rsync over SSH when all you have is a Plain Old FTP server to
connect to?
Maybe there is something I need to learn.

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 5:08 PM, Andrey Repin  wrote:

> Greetings, Saint Michael!
>
> > I need to do an rsync of hundreds of files very morning. The least
> complex
> > way to achieve that is to do an rsync with some parameters that narrow
> down what files I need.
> > Is there a better way?
>
> rsync over a network mount is the WORST POSSIBLE SOLUTION EVER.
> Use normal rsync over SSH, it will be much faster, even if you do checksum
> syncs.
>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Andrey Repin
> Sunday, November 19, 2017 01:07:34
>
> Sorry for my terrible english...
>
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] TTY issue

[Andrey Repin]

Greetings, Saint Michael!

> I need to do an rsync of hundreds of files very morning. The least complex
> way to achieve that is to do an rsync with some parameters that narrow down 
> what files I need.
> Is there a better way?

rsync over a network mount is the WORST POSSIBLE SOLUTION EVER.
Use normal rsync over SSH, it will be much faster, even if you do checksum
syncs.


-- 
With best regards,
Andrey Repin
Sunday, November 19, 2017 01:07:34

Sorry for my terrible english...

___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] TTY issue

[Saint Michael]

Let me try that

On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Marat Khalili  wrote:

> On 18/11/17 17:10, Saint Michael wrote:
>
> Yes, of course. It works but only if autodev=0
> That is the issue.
>
>
> Even as:
>
> lxc.hook.autodev = sh -c 'mknod ${LXC_ROOTFS_MOUNT}/dev/fuse c 10 229'
>
> ?
>
>
> --
>
> With Best Regards,
> Marat Khalili
>
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] TTY issue

[Marat Khalili]

On 18/11/17 17:10, Saint Michael wrote:

Yes, of course. It works but only if autodev=0
That is the issue.


Even as:


lxc.hook.autodev = sh -c 'mknod ${LXC_ROOTFS_MOUNT}/dev/fuse c 10 229'

?


--

With Best Regards,
Marat Khalili
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] TTY issue

[Saint Michael]

Yes, of course. It works but only if autodev=0
That is the issue.


On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 9:06 AM, Marat Khalili  wrote:

> On 16/11/17 18:50, Saint Michael wrote:
>
> The issue is with fuse, that is why I keep
> lxc.autodev=0
> if I do not, if I set it to 1, then fuse does not mount inside a
> container. I need fuse, for I mount an FTP server inside the container.
> So I am caught between a rock and a hard place.
> I akready asked about this contradiction on the LXC developers list.
>
> BTW, did you try:
>
> mknod /dev/fuse c 10 229
>
> ?
>
> --
>
> With Best Regards,
> Marat Khalili
>
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] TTY issue

[Marat Khalili]

On 16/11/17 18:50, Saint Michael wrote:

The issue is with fuse, that is why I keep
lxc.autodev=0
if I do not, if I set it to 1, then fuse does not mount inside a 
container. I need fuse, for I mount an FTP server inside the container.

So I am caught between a rock and a hard place.
I akready asked about this contradiction on the LXC developers list.

BTW, did you try:

mknod /dev/fuse c 10 229

?

--

With Best Regards,
Marat Khalili
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] TTY issue

[Marat Khalili]

On 18/11/17 14:46, Saint Michael wrote:
I need to do an rsync of hundreds of files very morning. The least 
complex way to achieve that is to do an rsync with some parameters 
that narrow down what files I need.

Is there a better way?

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Andrey Repin > wrote:


Was there the need for it? Really?
I feel like you've dug the grave for yourself with this config.



I understand the need, but not the solution. I also have some remote 
mounts (SMB, WebDAV...) that I'd like to rsync but don't want to mount 
on host. However, I my case I had to create "true" kvm-based VM for it. 
I'd like to learn a clean way to do it in LXC container without problems 
like OP encountered.



--

With Best Regards,
Marat Khalili

___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] TTY issue

[Saint Michael]

I need to do an rsync of hundreds of files very morning. The least complex
way to achieve that is to do an rsync with some parameters that narrow down
what files I need.
Is there a better way?

On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 11:43 PM, Andrey Repin  wrote:

> Greetings, Saint Michael!
>
> > lxc.mount.entry = proc proc proc nodev,noexec,nosuid 0 0
> > lxc.mount.entry = sysfs sys sysfs defaults  0 0
> > lxc.mount.entry = /cdr cdr none bind 0 0
> > lxc.mount.auto = cgroup:mixed
> > lxc.tty = 10
> > lxc.pts = 1024
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.deny = a
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:3 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:5 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 5:1 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 5:0 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 4:0 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 4:1 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:9 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 1:8 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 136:* rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 5:2 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 254:0 rwm
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 10:137 rwm # loop-control
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = b 7:* rwm# loop*
> > lxc.cgroup.devices.allow = c 10:229 rwm #fuse
> > lxc.autodev = 0
> > lxc.aa_profile = unconfined
> > lxc.cap.drop=
> > lxc.network.type = phys
> > lxc.network.flags = up
> > lxc.network.link = eth6
> > lxc.network.name = eth0
> > lxc.network.ipv4 = 0.0.0.0/27
> > lxc.network.type = macvlan
> > lxc.network.flags = up
> > lxc.network.link = eth3
> > lxc.network.name = eth1
> > lxc.network.macvlan.mode = bridge
> > lxc.network.ipv4 = 0.0.0.0/24
>
> > lxc.start.auto = 1
> > lxc.start.delay = 5
> > lxc.start.order = 0
> > lxc.rootfs = /data/iplinkcdr/rootfs
> > lxc.rootfs.backend = dir
> > lxc.utsname = iplinkcdr
>
> Was there the need for it? Really?
> I feel like you've dug the grave for yourself with this config.
>
>
> --
> With best regards,
> Andrey Repin
> Saturday, November 18, 2017 07:42:06
>
> Sorry for my terrible english...
> ___
> lxc-users mailing list
> lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
> http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
>
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users