Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-22 Thread Nikola Kotur
On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:05:44 +0800
coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote:

 I realize there's no template coming with your Debian packaging
 (/usr/share/lxc/templates is empty).
 Was it intentional?

Yes, I don't need templates, so I didn't add them to the package.

In case you do want to build them, add this to debian/control:

https://gist.github.com/kotnik/48ca8d5145854d096a83

 I was also wondering why dpkg made me install dnsmasq-base (how does
 it compare to dnsmasq?) but not dnsmasq, which is needed with for the
 default /etc/default/lxc-net config.

dnsmasq-base package contains the executable and documentation, dnsmasq
is just the tooling needed to run it as a daemon.

-- 
Nikola Kotur

http://blog.kotur.org
https://onename.io/kotnik


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread Nikola Kotur
On Fri, 16 May 2014 10:43:11 +0200
Wojciech Arabczyk ara...@gmail.com wrote:

 It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source
 package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have
 time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out
 yourself.

If needed, one can use my Debian packaging config here:

https://github.com/kotnik/lxc/tree/debian-1.0.3

That is a clean 1.0.3 version with functioning debian/ package
directory and it builds with python3 but without lua (since I don't
need it). To quickly build and test under wheezy:

dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -us

-- 
Nikola Kotur

http://blog.kotur.org
https://onename.io/kotnik


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users

Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation

2014-05-20 Thread Nikola Kotur
On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:36:39 +0800
coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote:

 Just to make sure, since I've already tried to install 1.0.3 from
 source and didn't get something consistent with the doc: do you get
 commands that actually behave like described in linuxcontainers.org?
 I mean `lxc-ls --fancy`, `--version` option available, etc... working
 like under Ubuntu 1.0.3 package?

Yes I do:

(platform)root@lab:~# lxc-attach --version
1.0.3

(platform)root@lab:~# lxc-ls --fancy
NAME  STATE  IPV4  IPV6  AUTOSTART  
--
...


-- 
Nikola Kotur

http://blog.kotur.org
https://onename.io/kotnik


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
lxc-users mailing list
lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org
http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users