Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
On Wed, 21 May 2014 18:05:44 +0800 coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote: I realize there's no template coming with your Debian packaging (/usr/share/lxc/templates is empty). Was it intentional? Yes, I don't need templates, so I didn't add them to the package. In case you do want to build them, add this to debian/control: https://gist.github.com/kotnik/48ca8d5145854d096a83 I was also wondering why dpkg made me install dnsmasq-base (how does it compare to dnsmasq?) but not dnsmasq, which is needed with for the default /etc/default/lxc-net config. dnsmasq-base package contains the executable and documentation, dnsmasq is just the tooling needed to run it as a daemon. -- Nikola Kotur http://blog.kotur.org https://onename.io/kotnik signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
On Fri, 16 May 2014 10:43:11 +0200 Wojciech Arabczyk ara...@gmail.com wrote: It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out yourself. If needed, one can use my Debian packaging config here: https://github.com/kotnik/lxc/tree/debian-1.0.3 That is a clean 1.0.3 version with functioning debian/ package directory and it builds with python3 but without lua (since I don't need it). To quickly build and test under wheezy: dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -us -- Nikola Kotur http://blog.kotur.org https://onename.io/kotnik signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
Hi, you're right on time, I was just beginning to compile lxc from the master branch and looking at options. Thanks for the package, it sounds great. Just to make sure, since I've already tried to install 1.0.3 from source and didn't get something consistent with the doc: do you get commands that actually behave like described in linuxcontainers.org? I mean `lxc-ls --fancy`, `--version` option available, etc... working like under Ubuntu 1.0.3 package? cheers Nikola Kotur mailto:kotn...@gmail.com 20 May 2014 17:02 On Fri, 16 May 2014 10:43:11 +0200 If needed, one can use my Debian packaging config here: https://github.com/kotnik/lxc/tree/debian-1.0.3 That is a clean 1.0.3 version with functioning debian/ package directory and it builds with python3 but without lua (since I don't need it). To quickly build and test under wheezy: dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -us ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users Wojciech Arabczyk mailto:ara...@gmail.com 16 May 2014 16:43 It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out yourself. With kind regards, -- pozdrawiam Wojciech Arabczyk ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users coolnodje mailto:coolno...@gmail.com 16 May 2014 11:26 apt-get remove lxc did the job before compiling 1.0.3. there's nothing left in /usr/bin and `which lxc-create` confirms it comes from /usr/local/bin So I understand, as expected, there shouldn't be any discrepancy between the Ubuntu 1.0.3 packaged version and the one I compiled on Debian, right? Something must have gone wrong then: could the option I used --with-distro=debian make a difference during ./configure? Also, I'd like to have everything in standard packaged lxc location except for the binaries. Would ./configure --prefix=/ --bindir=/usr/local would do ? The INSTALL file in the distrib is really well done and useful but a confirmation would be helpful. Thanks Wojciech Arabczyk mailto:ara...@gmail.com 15 May 2014 20:06 Hi, have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing the version from sources? Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources, cheers, coolnodje mailto:coolno...@gmail.com 15 May 2014 18:34 Hi, I've just compiled1.0.3 from source on Debian 7.5, without trouble. But I still get a behaviour that seem closer to v~0.8 that I got from apt-get beforehand, than to the version coming with Ubuntu 14.04. It's also not consistent with the https://linuxcontainers.org How to use it?: no `lxc-ls --fancy` option, no --version available, no man page... Did I do something wrong when compiling ? ./configure --with-distro=debian make make install ldconfig cheers -nodje ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:36:39 +0800 coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote: Just to make sure, since I've already tried to install 1.0.3 from source and didn't get something consistent with the doc: do you get commands that actually behave like described in linuxcontainers.org? I mean `lxc-ls --fancy`, `--version` option available, etc... working like under Ubuntu 1.0.3 package? Yes I do: (platform)root@lab:~# lxc-attach --version 1.0.3 (platform)root@lab:~# lxc-ls --fancy NAME STATE IPV4 IPV6 AUTOSTART -- ... -- Nikola Kotur http://blog.kotur.org https://onename.io/kotnik signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
done, this is great and seems to be working fine, at least it's as expected. I'll copy in some container now and check that everything is all right. I understand now I wasn't probably enabling enough option during ./configure, but it seemed odd that even the very basic options like --version would not be enabled. Thanks a lot Nikola Kotur mailto:kotn...@gmail.com 20 May 2014 17:41 On Tue, 20 May 2014 17:36:39 +0800 Yes I do: (platform)root@lab:~# lxc-attach --version 1.0.3 (platform)root@lab:~# lxc-ls --fancy NAME STATE IPV4 IPV6 AUTOSTART -- ... ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users Nikola Kotur mailto:kotn...@gmail.com 20 May 2014 17:02 On Fri, 16 May 2014 10:43:11 +0200 If needed, one can use my Debian packaging config here: https://github.com/kotnik/lxc/tree/debian-1.0.3 That is a clean 1.0.3 version with functioning debian/ package directory and it builds with python3 but without lua (since I don't need it). To quickly build and test under wheezy: dpkg-buildpackage -b -uc -us ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users Wojciech Arabczyk mailto:ara...@gmail.com 16 May 2014 16:43 It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out yourself. With kind regards, -- pozdrawiam Wojciech Arabczyk ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users coolnodje mailto:coolno...@gmail.com 16 May 2014 11:26 apt-get remove lxc did the job before compiling 1.0.3. there's nothing left in /usr/bin and `which lxc-create` confirms it comes from /usr/local/bin So I understand, as expected, there shouldn't be any discrepancy between the Ubuntu 1.0.3 packaged version and the one I compiled on Debian, right? Something must have gone wrong then: could the option I used --with-distro=debian make a difference during ./configure? Also, I'd like to have everything in standard packaged lxc location except for the binaries. Would ./configure --prefix=/ --bindir=/usr/local would do ? The INSTALL file in the distrib is really well done and useful but a confirmation would be helpful. Thanks Wojciech Arabczyk mailto:ara...@gmail.com 15 May 2014 20:06 Hi, have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing the version from sources? Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources, cheers, ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
As far as i remember, my hand compilation experience shows, that it is really necessary to build against python3 - otherwise all those --fancy options don't work. ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out yourself. With kind regards, On 16 May 2014 05:26, coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote: apt-get remove lxc did the job before compiling 1.0.3. there's nothing left in /usr/bin and `which lxc-create` confirms it comes from /usr/local/bin So I understand, as expected, there shouldn't be any discrepancy between the Ubuntu 1.0.3 packaged version and the one I compiled on Debian, right? Something must have gone wrong then: could the option I used --with-distro=debian make a difference during ./configure? Also, I'd like to have everything in standard packaged lxc location except for the binaries. Would ./configure --prefix=/ --bindir=/usr/local would do ? The INSTALL file in the distrib is really well done and useful but a confirmation would be helpful. Thanks Wojciech Arabczyk ara...@gmail.com 15 May 2014 20:06 Hi, have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing the version from sources? Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources, cheers, ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users -- pozdrawiam Wojciech Arabczyk ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
I'm willing to try but I don't see how a deb package would be different from the latest source install. What's the idea? 1.0.3-1 seems to be more recent but I doubt it'd be much different from 1.0.3. How about compiling from git repo HEAD? thanks Wojciech Arabczyk mailto:ara...@gmail.com 16 May 2014 16:43 It would be best, if you'd try to create a deb package from the source package in sid, and then install via dpkg. Sorry, but i don't have time to provide specific instructions. You'll have to dig it out yourself. With kind regards, -- pozdrawiam Wojciech Arabczyk ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users coolnodje mailto:coolno...@gmail.com 16 May 2014 11:26 apt-get remove lxc did the job before compiling 1.0.3. there's nothing left in /usr/bin and `which lxc-create` confirms it comes from /usr/local/bin So I understand, as expected, there shouldn't be any discrepancy between the Ubuntu 1.0.3 packaged version and the one I compiled on Debian, right? Something must have gone wrong then: could the option I used --with-distro=debian make a difference during ./configure? Also, I'd like to have everything in standard packaged lxc location except for the binaries. Would ./configure --prefix=/ --bindir=/usr/local would do ? The INSTALL file in the distrib is really well done and useful but a confirmation would be helpful. Thanks Wojciech Arabczyk mailto:ara...@gmail.com 15 May 2014 20:06 Hi, have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing the version from sources? Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources, cheers, coolnodje mailto:coolno...@gmail.com 15 May 2014 18:34 Hi, I've just compiled1.0.3 from source on Debian 7.5, without trouble. But I still get a behaviour that seem closer to v~0.8 that I got from apt-get beforehand, than to the version coming with Ubuntu 14.04. It's also not consistent with the https://linuxcontainers.org How to use it?: no `lxc-ls --fancy` option, no --version available, no man page... Did I do something wrong when compiling ? ./configure --with-distro=debian make make install ldconfig cheers -nodje ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
[lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
Hi, I've just compiled1.0.3 from source on Debian 7.5, without trouble. But I still get a behaviour that seem closer to v~0.8 that I got from apt-get beforehand, than to the version coming with Ubuntu 14.04. It's also not consistent with the https://linuxcontainers.org How to use it?: no `lxc-ls --fancy` option, no --version available, no man page... Did I do something wrong when compiling ? ./configure --with-distro=debian make make install ldconfig cheers -nodje ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
Hi, have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing the version from sources? Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources, cheers, On 15 May 2014 12:34, coolnodje coolno...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I've just compiled1.0.3 from source on Debian 7.5, without trouble. But I still get a behaviour that seem closer to v~0.8 that I got from apt-get beforehand, than to the version coming with Ubuntu 14.04. It's also not consistent with the https://linuxcontainers.org How to use it?: no `lxc-ls --fancy` option, no --version available, no man page... Did I do something wrong when compiling ? ./configure --with-distro=debian make make install ldconfig cheers -nodje ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users -- pozdrawiam Wojciech Arabczyk ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [lxc-users] 1.0.3 on Debian 7.5 not consistent with documentation
apt-get remove lxc did the job before compiling 1.0.3. there's nothing left in /usr/bin and `which lxc-create` confirms it comes from /usr/local/bin So I understand, as expected, there shouldn't be any discrepancy between the Ubuntu 1.0.3 packaged version and the one I compiled on Debian, right? Something must have gone wrong then: could the option I used --with-distro=debian make a difference during ./configure? Also, I'd like to have everything in standard packaged lxc location except for the binaries. Would ./configure --prefix=/ --bindir=/usr/local would do ? The INSTALL file in the distrib is really well done and useful but a confirmation would be helpful. Thanks Wojciech Arabczyk mailto:ara...@gmail.com 15 May 2014 20:06 Hi, have you uninstalled the packaged version of lxc prior to installing the version from sources? Most probably, the /usr/bin lxc takes precedence to the one you installed to /usr/local prefix from the sources, cheers, ___ lxc-users mailing list lxc-users@lists.linuxcontainers.org http://lists.linuxcontainers.org/listinfo/lxc-users
