[Lxc-users] port numbers for containers
Hi, Want to know if port numbers are virtualized for containers or do the containers and host share the port space ? Please let me know. --Nirmal -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [Lxc-users] port numbers for containers
Quoting Nirmal Guhan (vavat...@gmail.com): Hi, Want to know if port numbers are virtualized for containers or do the containers and host share the port space ? Please let me know. Wrong layer. If the container shares a network namespace with the host, then it shares its networking. If it has its own network namespace, then it has its own entire network stack. So no, 'port space' isn't virtualized.vs.shared, but the network devices are. -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [Lxc-users] /dev/rtc
Serge Hallyn wrote, On 2010. 08. 11. 20:03: I guess the container tried to create it after being moved into the devices cgroup. You didn't give the container the rights to create that device. How can I give it? As you can see, everything is the same, as with the other devices, except at the end the 'w' and 'm'. Well, you tell us - how is your container doing now that it doesn't have it? I don't see any difference, but actually I don't know, I should? Right now I'm just happy to see it booting. I just don't understand, why this device is writeable in every example config. In my opinion it's a hole. Thank you, tamas -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [Lxc-users] port numbers for containers
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote: Quoting Nirmal Guhan (vavat...@gmail.com): On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 5:06 AM, Serge Hallyn serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote: Quoting Nirmal Guhan (vavat...@gmail.com): Hi, Want to know if port numbers are virtualized for containers or do the containers and host share the port space ? Please let me know. Wrong layer. If the container shares a network namespace with the host, then it shares its networking. If it has its own network namespace, then it has its own entire network stack. So no, 'port space' isn't virtualized.vs.shared, but the network devices are. Thanks. How do I configure the container to have its own network stack? I did cat /etc/lxc-basic.conf EOF lxc.network.type=veth lxc.network.link=virbr0 lxc.network.flags=up EOF lxc-create -n ubuntu1 -f /etc/lxc-basic.conf -t ubuntu Thanks. If I do macvlan, I assume there is no separate network namespace and hence ports will be shared and otherwise(veth) not ? --Nirmal -serge -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
