Re: [Lxc-users] version 0.8.0 coming soon
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/28/2012 01:20 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Hi all,
I will release a 0.8.0-rc1. I am looking for volunteer to test it :)
Worked fine for me. Tested create and clone of ubuntu, ubuntu and
ubuntu-cloud images, with dir and lvm backing stores. (And a run
of lp:~serge-hallyn/+junk/lxc-test)
Note, because upstream kernel didn't much care about the
'mount -o remount,ro /' problem, I'm going to patch lxc to
pin open a '${rootfs}.hold' file, as long as the container
is running. That will prevent the underlying fs from being
remounted ro. (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/942325 for
details). That'll buy us some time to find a better solution
in the kernel.
Why can a container change mount options outside of its rootfs?
Sorry for the stupid question:)
It's not a stupid question at all.
The container isn't changing mount options outside of its rootfs. THere
are two places an fs can be marked readonly - in the mount itself, and in
the superblock. When you make a bind mount, you are creating more mounts
(vfsmounts) using the same superblcok.
If you do
mount --bind / / # not needed in container bc it's already been done
mount --bind -o remount,ro /
then you are setting the reasonly flag on the mount itself. If you just do
mount -o remount,ro /
then you are setting the reasonly flag on the superblock, which will
force all other mounts of that superblcok to also be readonly.
Right now there is no way to prevent a container from doing that. I sent
a patch to make the devices cgroup be consulted on that, so that it could
reteurn -EPERM. That was refused. The two other options I'm considering
(and it wouldn't hurt ot have both) are 1. to pass the remoutn flags to the
LSM (selinux or apparmor or smack) so that it can deny permission. Right
now it can't do that (except for all-or-nothing check on remount). And 2.
to make it so that after doing
mount --bind / /
mount --bind -o remount,ro /
mount --bind -o remount,rw /
any subsequent
mount -o remount,rw /
would be refused (or automatically done only at the mount level). I don't
think that should be hard to do at fs/namespace.c:do_remount().
-serge
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [Lxc-users] Virtual Interfaces inside VM
Just a random thought, do you have the gre drivers in the kernel of the host machine. Either compiled in, or modprobe-d? On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 15:25 -0300, Sergio Charpinel Jr. wrote: Hi, I want to create virtual network interfaces to use with GRE Tunnels. Using debootstrap, I've installed debian squeeze, and configured my virtual interface as below: auto tun0 iface tun0 inet static address 10.1.253.1 netmask 255.255.255.252 up ifconfig tun0 multicast pre-up iptunnel add tun0 mode gre remote 10.27.1.253 local 10.27.1.1 ttl 255 pointopoint 10.1.253.2 post-down iptunnel del tun0 But i get the following error: ipgre init: can't add protocol . I've already tried with debian Lenny from lxc-debian script, but a different error appears. Any ideas? Thanks in advance. -- Sergio Roberto Charpinel Jr. -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d ___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users -- Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow! The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3, Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d___ Lxc-users mailing list Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [Lxc-users] version 0.8.0 coming soon
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Serge Hallyn
serge.hal...@canonical.com wrote:
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/28/2012 01:20 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Hi all,
I will release a 0.8.0-rc1. I am looking for volunteer to test it :)
Worked fine for me. Tested create and clone of ubuntu, ubuntu and
ubuntu-cloud images, with dir and lvm backing stores. (And a run
of lp:~serge-hallyn/+junk/lxc-test)
Note, because upstream kernel didn't much care about the
'mount -o remount,ro /' problem, I'm going to patch lxc to
pin open a '${rootfs}.hold' file, as long as the container
is running. That will prevent the underlying fs from being
remounted ro. (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/942325 for
details). That'll buy us some time to find a better solution
in the kernel.
Why can a container change mount options outside of its rootfs?
Sorry for the stupid question:)
It's not a stupid question at all.
The container isn't changing mount options outside of its rootfs. THere
are two places an fs can be marked readonly - in the mount itself, and in
the superblock. When you make a bind mount, you are creating more mounts
(vfsmounts) using the same superblcok.
If you do
mount --bind / / # not needed in container bc it's already been done
mount --bind -o remount,ro /
then you are setting the reasonly flag on the mount itself. If you just do
mount -o remount,ro /
then you are setting the reasonly flag on the superblock, which will
force all other mounts of that superblcok to also be readonly.
Right now there is no way to prevent a container from doing that. I sent
a patch to make the devices cgroup be consulted on that, so that it could
reteurn -EPERM. That was refused. The two other options I'm considering
(and it wouldn't hurt ot have both) are 1. to pass the remoutn flags to the
LSM (selinux or apparmor or smack) so that it can deny permission. Right
now it can't do that (except for all-or-nothing check on remount). And 2.
to make it so that after doing
mount --bind / /
mount --bind -o remount,ro /
mount --bind -o remount,rw /
any subsequent
mount -o remount,rw /
would be refused (or automatically done only at the mount level). I don't
think that should be hard to do at fs/namespace.c:do_remount().
-serge
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
tested it on f16
ubuntu container from older version still works
cleaning up of nested cgroups now works and no need for me to manually
rmdir all cgroups
f16 container starts (with some issues as before)
f14 works
--
BR
RH
http://informatiq.org
--
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
___
Lxc-users mailing list
Lxc-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lxc-users
Re: [Lxc-users] version 0.8.0 coming soon
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/28/2012 04:13 PM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Papp Tamas (tom...@martos.bme.hu):
On 02/28/2012 01:20 AM, Serge Hallyn wrote:
Quoting Daniel Lezcano (daniel.lezc...@free.fr):
Hi all,
I will release a 0.8.0-rc1. I am looking for volunteer to test it :)
Worked fine for me. Tested create and clone of ubuntu, ubuntu and
ubuntu-cloud images, with dir and lvm backing stores. (And a run
of lp:~serge-hallyn/+junk/lxc-test)
Note, because upstream kernel didn't much care about the
'mount -o remount,ro /' problem, I'm going to patch lxc to
pin open a '${rootfs}.hold' file, as long as the container
is running. That will prevent the underlying fs from being
remounted ro. (see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/942325 for
details). That'll buy us some time to find a better solution
in the kernel.
Why can a container change mount options outside of its rootfs?
Sorry for the stupid question:)
It's not a stupid question at all.
The container isn't changing mount options outside of its rootfs. THere
are two places an fs can be marked readonly - in the mount itself, and in
the superblock. When you make a bind mount, you are creating more mounts
(vfsmounts) using the same superblcok.
If you do
mount --bind / / # not needed in container bc it's already been done
mount --bind -o remount,ro /
then you are setting the reasonly flag on the mount itself. If you just do
mount -o remount,ro /
then you are setting the reasonly flag on the superblock, which will
force all other mounts of that superblcok to also be readonly.
Right now there is no way to prevent a container from doing that. I sent
a patch to make the devices cgroup be consulted on that, so that it could
reteurn -EPERM. That was refused. The two other options I'm considering
(and it wouldn't hurt ot have both) are 1. to pass the remoutn flags to the
LSM (selinux or apparmor or smack) so that it can deny permission. Right
now it can't do that (except for all-or-nothing check on remount). And 2.
to make it so that after doing
mount --bind / /
mount --bind -o remount,ro /
mount --bind -o remount,rw /
any subsequent
mount -o remount,rw /
would be refused (or automatically done only at the mount level). I don't
think that should be hard to do at fs/namespace.c:do_remount().
This may be to much for my brain:)
Anyway, could you make deb package from it?
I've got it working for an ubuntu package, though we're in freeze right
now. I intend to push the patch to my github tree tomorrow, and I've
pushed the package to ppa:serge-hallyn/virt (version 0.7.5-3ubuntu31,
should build in a few hours). Meanwhile here is the actual patch for
now.
Tests fine for me.
Subject: lxc-start: if rootfs is a dir, pin the fs
Otherwise the container can remount the shared underlying fs readonly.
Index: lxc-dnsmasq/src/lxc/conf.c
===
--- lxc-dnsmasq.orig/src/lxc/conf.c 2012-02-28 19:13:01.40096 +
+++ lxc-dnsmasq/src/lxc/conf.c 2012-02-28 20:05:45.538144907 +
@@ -445,6 +445,51 @@
return mount_unknow_fs(rootfs, target, 0);
}
+/*
+ * pin_rootfs
+ * if rootfs is a directory, then open ${rootfs}.hold for writing for the
+ * duration of the container run, to prevent the container from marking the
+ * underlying fs readonly on shutdown.
+ * return -1 on error.
+ * return -2 if nothing needed to be pinned.
+ * return an open fd (=0) if we pinned it.
+ */
+int pin_rootfs(const char *rootfs)
+{
+ char absrootfs[MAXPATHLEN];
+ char absrootfspin[MAXPATHLEN];
+ struct stat s;
+ int ret, fd;
+
+ if (!realpath(rootfs, absrootfs)) {
+ SYSERROR(failed to get real path for '%s', rootfs);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (access(absrootfs, F_OK)) {
+ SYSERROR('%s' is not accessible, absrootfs);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (stat(absrootfs, s)) {
+ SYSERROR(failed to stat '%s', absrootfs);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (!__S_ISTYPE(s.st_mode, S_IFDIR))
+ return -2;
+
+ ret = snprintf(absrootfspin, MAXPATHLEN, %s%s, absrootfs, .hold);
+ if (ret = MAXPATHLEN) {
+ SYSERROR(pathname too long for rootfs hold file);
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ fd = open(absrootfspin, O_CREAT | O_RDWR, S_IWUSR|S_IRUSR);
+ INFO(opened %s as fd %d\n, absrootfspin, fd);
+ return fd;
+}
+
static int mount_rootfs(const char *rootfs, const char *target)
{
char absrootfs[MAXPATHLEN];
Index: lxc-dnsmasq/src/lxc/conf.h
===
--- lxc-dnsmasq.orig/src/lxc/conf.h 2012-02-28 19:13:01.40096 +
+++ lxc-dnsmasq/src/lxc/conf.h 2012-02-28 19:13:01.40096 +
@@ -218,6 +218,8 @@
*/
