Re: [Lynx-dev] Any idea what one can do about the people who feel the need to block lynx

2020-06-22 Thread Tim Chase
On 2020-06-22 23:30, Claudio Calvelli wrote:
> Any suggestion on what one can tell these ignorants so they may
> learn something?

I know that the OWASP "Core Rule Set (CRS)" (prior to version 3.0) for
the Apache "mod_security" module had blocking based on the User-Agent
header that included lynx and curl (at least until a more recent
release)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ModSecurity#Former_Lynx_browser_blocking

so if admins are just downloading a "yep, sounds like a good default
list to me" configuration without actually checking what it blocks,
lynx users can end up with "406 Not Acceptable" errors.  If you
encounter those and tweaking your settings so that lynx sends the
user-agent with "l_y_n_x" instead of "lynx" and that solves it, you
might have better luck asking the admin to upgrade to CRS3 which
solves the issue.

That said, because you're getting a 403 rather than a 406, it sounds
like that might not be the case here.

-tim





___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] Any idea what one can do about the people who feel the need to block lynx

2020-06-22 Thread Travis Siegel
Sounds like you got a boiler plate response.  It's unfortunate, but I 
find a lot of supposed tech support requests these days run up against a 
brick wall as regards actual help.  You're almost always quoted a 
nonrelevant piece of gibberish that has no bearing on the problem you're 
trying to solve.  The only thing to do is continue explaining (nicely if 
possible, though sometimes, it gets to the point where you just gotta 
vent on them), and eventually, someone will realize what you're asking 
isn't covered by their generic template responses, and you'll get an 
actual response that addresses the issue.  How many iterations this 
takes varies greatly, and in one case, after over a month of back and 
forths on a nearly daily basis, I finally gave up, and vowed never to 
use that site ever again, which interestingly enough I actually broke 
earlier today, and tried to purchase something else from them, which met 
with the same exact issues I'd gone back and forth with them about 
nearly 5 years ago.  Good to know some things never change.


On 6/22/2020 5:30 PM, Claudio Calvelli wrote:

As we all know, there are ignorants who imagine that they need to block
lynx from accessing their sites.  I just contacted one with evidence
that they block based on user-agent and asked why they feel the need to
deny access - and what do they come up with?


Please switch off your VPN or proxy then click here:
https://ceoemail.com


I wasn't using a VPN or proxy, and of course that is completely 
irrelevant
to their User-Agent filtering. (and of course the URL they quoted 
resulted

in a "403 forbidden" because they have no idea what they are doing)

Any suggestion on what one can tell these ignorants so they may learn
something?

Claudio Calvelli


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


Re: [Lynx-dev] Any idea what one can do about the people who feel the need to block lynx

2020-06-22 Thread Chime Hart
Hi Claudio: Just an opinion, but I think an Internet culture has gone far 
past our favorite friendly browsers. Yes its rather inconvenient when 
traveling to one of these sites with a 403 error, then having to go in an 
options menu and uncheck the user agent box, before submitting. Sure thats 
anoying, but these sites where you just get a blank page such as that of 
my Cable TV company at spectrum.net
Or these sites like radiodiscussions.com  which employ DOS cloud 
protection. Obviously there are millions of sites which either require 
javascript or make it hard to use without it. Its been many years since I 
was able to talk a webmaster in to restoring a printer friendly page at 
the BBC for one. Now, as so many of these web site owners are so hungup on 
javascript, their minds are made up. But almost as bad, its much more of a 
challenge to write, as "whois" will not show an exact contact. Obviously I 
wish you luck, but short of an FCC or Supreme Court intervention, we may 
be out of luck

Chime


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev


[Lynx-dev] Any idea what one can do about the people who feel the need to block lynx

2020-06-22 Thread Claudio Calvelli

As we all know, there are ignorants who imagine that they need to block
lynx from accessing their sites.  I just contacted one with evidence
that they block based on user-agent and asked why they feel the need to
deny access - and what do they come up with?


Please switch off your VPN or proxy then click here:
https://ceoemail.com


I wasn't using a VPN or proxy, and of course that is completely irrelevant
to their User-Agent filtering. (and of course the URL they quoted resulted
in a "403 forbidden" because they have no idea what they are doing)

Any suggestion on what one can tell these ignorants so they may learn
something?

Claudio Calvelli


___
Lynx-dev mailing list
Lynx-dev@nongnu.org
https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev