Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)
On Mon, Jun 14, 2021 at 11:40:13AM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 02:19:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > I think there is a related issue: Some exports that use ps2pdf now > > > > > seem > > > > > to need the flag "-dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" on TL21. Adding the following > > > > > line to my preferences file fixes some tests: > > > > > > > > > > \converter "ps" "pdf" "ps2pdf -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY $$i $$o" > > > > > "hyperref-driver=dvips > > > > > > > > Huh, this would be painful if true in general. > > > > > > Indeed it does seem annoying, but is only relevant for a few of our > > > documents. > > > > > > > What exact version of ghostscript do you have? > > > > > > $ gs --version > > > 9.53.3 > > > > If interested, see also: https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12303 > > According to > https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/597980/ghostscript-requires-dallowpstransparency-when-compiling-pstricks-figures > "An up-to-date TeX installation, such as TeXLive-2021, should already have > the GS call configured with -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" > Is this actually true? I have an up-to-date TL21 installation and still get the issue. I'm not sure if the quoted statement was meant to be only about pdflatex. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: [LyX/master] Revert "Fix bug #10263"
Le 13/06/2021 à 18:33, Kornel Benko a écrit :
Am Sun, 13 Jun 2021 11:42:59 -0400
schrieb Scott Kostyshak :
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 01:47:41PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 10:13:16AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
commit 441c6a93590698c3c57982c8b80179d6809fb106
Author: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
Date: Mon Apr 12 20:44:58 2021 +0200
Revert "Fix bug #10263"
A series of commits, culminating at 812ff7de, pushed a few days later,
fixes the bug at its root. This one is not needed anymore to fix
This reverts commit 001f5a47861f04c985323677dfd17ef15b8c33a7
---
src/insets/InsetFoot.h |4
1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/src/insets/InsetFoot.h b/src/insets/InsetFoot.h
index 1e4b0d2..0c3f65a 100644
--- a/src/insets/InsetFoot.h
+++ b/src/insets/InsetFoot.h
@@ -45,10 +45,6 @@ private:
///
Inset * clone() const override { return new InsetFoot(*this); }
///
- bool inheritFont() const override { return true; }
- ///
- bool allowMultiPar() const override { return true; }
- ///
docstring custom_label_;
///
bool intitle_;
--
The following ctest started failing with this commit:
export/doc/ja/Tutorial_pdf5_systemF
The diff between the "bad" (current master) and "good" (current master
with this commit reverted) is as follows:
$ diff good.tex bad.tex
61c61
< \author{\LyX
プロジェクトチーム\thanks{なにかコメントや間違いの修正がある場合には，\protect\LyX
文書化メーリングリスト(\protect\href{mailto:lyx-d...@lists.lyx.org}{lyx-d...@lists.lyx.org})までお知らせ下さい．この文書の翻訳は，当初人見光太郎氏が行った貢献に基づいています．}}
---
\author{\LyX プロジェクトチーム\thanks{{\normalsize
なにかコメントや間違いの修正がある場合には，\protect\LyX
文書化メーリングリスト(\protect\href{mailto:lyx-d...@lists.lyx.org}{lyx-d...@lists.lyx.org})までお知らせ下さい．この文書の翻訳は，当初人見光太郎氏が行った貢献に基づいています．}}}
$
I have no idea why the {\normalsize ...} would cause the failure. Does
anyone know the problem?
Note that we are already aware of several other Japanese documents that
do not compile with non-TeX fonts:
export/doc/ja/(Additional|LaTeXConfig|Math|UserGuide).*_systemF
so it would not be surprising if we need to add Tutorial.lyx to the list.
By the way, if this report does not lead to a fix in LyX or a bug
report, we should log this wasted time in
development/autotests/ctests-costs-benefits.txt.
I think the French Powerdot example might also have a footnote where
this commit changes behavior. If I remove the footnote, compilation
succeeds. I did not do a bisect on that document but it feels like a
similar issue.
Does anyone know what the core issue is? Here is the LaTeX code causing
the problem after this commit:
\thanks{{\normalsize Traduction française Jean-Pierre
Chrétien, }{\normalsize\texttt{}}}{\normalsize},
novembre
2009.}}}
Do we need to adapt lyx2lyx perhaps? Or is this a LyX LaTeX export
issue?
Scott
This compiles also if changing the font inside the footnote (Teletype->default)
Hello
The French Powerdot file was a mess because the Footnote which gives info about
the translator exported to LaTeX as \thanks, splitting the content in two pieces
and leaving spurious parentheses at the end.
I dissolved the Footnote inset and made the content a LyX note, compiles fine
now.
Committed at 5b0b3f053e
--
Jean-Pierre
--
lyx-devel mailing list
lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)
Am Mon, 14 Jun 2021 11:40:13 +0200 schrieb Pavel Sanda : > On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 02:19:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > I think there is a related issue: Some exports that use ps2pdf now > > > > > seem > > > > > to need the flag "-dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" on TL21. Adding the following > > > > > line to my preferences file fixes some tests: > > > > > > > > > > \converter "ps" "pdf" "ps2pdf -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY $$i $$o" > > > > > "hyperref-driver=dvips > > > > > > > > Huh, this would be painful if true in general. > > > > > > Indeed it does seem annoying, but is only relevant for a few of our > > > documents. > > > > > > > What exact version of ghostscript do you have? > > > > > > $ gs --version > > > 9.53.3 > > > > If interested, see also: https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12303 > > According to > https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/597980/ghostscript-requires-dallowpstransparency-when-compiling-pstricks-figures > "An up-to-date TeX installation, such as TeXLive-2021, should already have > the GS call > configured with -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" Is this actually true? > > Pavel Since gs is not part of texlive21, this seems unlikely. On ubuntu: $ dpkg -S /usr/bin/gs ghostscript: /usr/bin/gs Kornel pgpCYpjPWn4Xq.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
Re: Anyone on TeX Live 2021 pretest ? (to confirm a regression for ja LilyPond)
On Sun, Jun 13, 2021 at 11:09:12AM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 02:19:26PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 04:57:49PM +0200, Pavel Sanda wrote: > > > On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 01:45:24PM -0400, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > I think there is a related issue: Some exports that use ps2pdf now seem > > > > to need the flag "-dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" on TL21. Adding the following > > > > line to my preferences file fixes some tests: > > > > > > > > \converter "ps" "pdf" "ps2pdf -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY $$i $$o" > > > > "hyperref-driver=dvips > > > > > > Huh, this would be painful if true in general. > > > > Indeed it does seem annoying, but is only relevant for a few of our > > documents. > > > > > What exact version of ghostscript do you have? > > > > $ gs --version > > 9.53.3 > > If interested, see also: https://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/12303 According to https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/597980/ghostscript-requires-dallowpstransparency-when-compiling-pstricks-figures "An up-to-date TeX installation, such as TeXLive-2021, should already have the GS call configured with -dALLOWPSTRANSPARENCY" Is this actually true? Pavel -- lyx-devel mailing list lyx-devel@lists.lyx.org http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-devel
