Re: 1.6svn regression: enum/item in tables
Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Dov Feldstern wrote: I've tested your file with the patch committed at r23756, and it seems to work. Let me know if there are any additional problems. Yes, this seems to solve the problem. Thanks! but it introduces new ones. If the table cell is not fixed-width, only Standard (or Plain) layout is allowed, because other layouts (such as lists) trigger LaTeX errors. Cf. how LyX 1.5 behaves. There sure are a lot of different cases here! It may be becoming apparent that, to solve this properly, we need an InsetTableCell that would handle know all about its width, etc, and not just an InsetText. I could deal with this for the moment if I knew how to do the following. Suppose I'm in an InsetText, and I know that I'm actually in a table cell. I need to find (i) the containing InsetTabular and (ii) the idx_type for the cell I'm in, so that I can do roughly this: insetTabular->forceEmptyLayout(cellNumber), which will figure out from the cell's CellData what to do. If we can't do that, well, then we need an InsetTableCell that would provide us with access to this information. rh
Re: 1.6svn regression: enum/item in tables
Dov Feldstern wrote: > > I've tested your file with the patch committed at r23756, and it seems > > to work. Let me know if there are any additional problems. > > Yes, this seems to solve the problem. Thanks! but it introduces new ones. If the table cell is not fixed-width, only Standard (or Plain) layout is allowed, because other layouts (such as lists) trigger LaTeX errors. Cf. how LyX 1.5 behaves. Jürgen
Re: 1.6svn regression: enum/item in tables
rgheck wrote: Richard Heck wrote: Dov Feldstern wrote: Dov Feldstern wrote: Hi! It seems that enumeration/itemize (perhaps other layouts as well?) are no longer working inside a table. See the attached lyx file, created with r23573 from March 8, which still works fine. Try opening it in current svn (by r23669 from March 11 the problem already exists) --- the itemize and enumeration layouts are not recognized --- not in the GUI, nor in the latex output --- the text just appears in standard layout. Using mercurials bisect extension (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/BisectExtension), I was able to track this bug down to r23662. Richard --- any ideas? I'll have a look. I'm probably overdoing it by requiring tables to use the EmptyLayout. The solution is presumably to put the enumeration inside an empty layout. I've tested your file with the patch committed at r23756, and it seems to work. Let me know if there are any additional problems. Yes, this seems to solve the problem. Thanks! rh
Re: 1.6svn regression: enum/item in tables
Richard Heck wrote: Dov Feldstern wrote: Dov Feldstern wrote: Hi! It seems that enumeration/itemize (perhaps other layouts as well?) are no longer working inside a table. See the attached lyx file, created with r23573 from March 8, which still works fine. Try opening it in current svn (by r23669 from March 11 the problem already exists) --- the itemize and enumeration layouts are not recognized --- not in the GUI, nor in the latex output --- the text just appears in standard layout. Using mercurials bisect extension (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/BisectExtension), I was able to track this bug down to r23662. Richard --- any ideas? I'll have a look. I'm probably overdoing it by requiring tables to use the EmptyLayout. The solution is presumably to put the enumeration inside an empty layout. I've tested your file with the patch committed at r23756, and it seems to work. Let me know if there are any additional problems. rh
Re: 1.6svn regression: enum/item in tables
Dov Feldstern wrote: Dov Feldstern wrote: Hi! It seems that enumeration/itemize (perhaps other layouts as well?) are no longer working inside a table. See the attached lyx file, created with r23573 from March 8, which still works fine. Try opening it in current svn (by r23669 from March 11 the problem already exists) --- the itemize and enumeration layouts are not recognized --- not in the GUI, nor in the latex output --- the text just appears in standard layout. Using mercurials bisect extension (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/BisectExtension), I was able to track this bug down to r23662. Richard --- any ideas? I'll have a look. I'm probably overdoing it by requiring tables to use the EmptyLayout. The solution is presumably to put the enumeration inside an empty layout. rh
Re: 1.6svn regression: enum/item in tables
Dov Feldstern wrote: Hi! It seems that enumeration/itemize (perhaps other layouts as well?) are no longer working inside a table. See the attached lyx file, created with r23573 from March 8, which still works fine. Try opening it in current svn (by r23669 from March 11 the problem already exists) --- the itemize and enumeration layouts are not recognized --- not in the GUI, nor in the latex output --- the text just appears in standard layout. Using mercurials bisect extension (http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/wiki/index.cgi/BisectExtension), I was able to track this bug down to r23662. Richard --- any ideas? Thanks! Dov
1.6svn regression: enum/item in tables
Hi! It seems that enumeration/itemize (perhaps other layouts as well?) are no longer working inside a table. See the attached lyx file, created with r23573 from March 8, which still works fine. Try opening it in current svn (by r23669 from March 11 the problem already exists) --- the itemize and enumeration layouts are not recognized --- not in the GUI, nor in the latex output --- the text just appears in standard layout. (I've been away for the past few weeks, and didn't go over the mailing list very thoroughly, so I apologize if this has already been reported). Thanks! Dov enum_item_in_table.lyx Description: application/lyx
