Re: Fwd: Nomenclature in TOC different/unexpected in LyX2.1 vs Lyx2,2.2

2016-10-26 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller 
Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2016, 13:13 +0200 schrieb Michael Berger:
> Beat me - I do not recall how and why it got there but killing it
> solved my problem: see snapshot.
> Is this line of any use ever or may I scrap it for good?

I think you can safely remove it since you already add this header to
the toc in your document.

Jürgen

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: Fwd: Nomenclature in TOC different/unexpected in LyX2.1 vs Lyx2,2.2

2016-10-26 Thread Michael Berger 

On 10/26/2016 09:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2016, 08:07 +0200 schrieb Michael Berger:

Dear developers,
I am forwarding my initial e-mail to you because I found that the
behavior described is not specific to classicthesis.
Other document classes (I checked Komascript Article and Article
Standard) show a similar behavior. That makes me believe it is a LyX
2.2.2 , 2.2.x  etc. issue.
Can you help, please?

Michael, you should know by now that we need a minimal example LyX file
to reproduce the error. Screenshots are not much useful.

Jürgen


Michael
Jürgen, this time you taught me a  clear lesson - I will remember it, 
for sure!:-D


I had the mini example ready to be sent and then reassambled what I was 
about to do.

Checking the Latex preamble over again I starred at the following line:

\def\nompreamble{\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\nomname}\markboth{\nomname}{\nomname}}


and that looked so bloody guilty!

Beat me - I do not recall how and why it got there but killing it solved 
my problem: see snapshot.

Is this line of any use ever or may I scrap it for good?

So, it is no issue of Lyx etc. but simply (as always) my own incompetence.

Sorry once more and thanks for your continuing patience! ;-)
Michael

Re: Fwd: Nomenclature in TOC different/unexpected in LyX2.1 vs Lyx2,2.2

2016-10-26 Thread Michael Berger 

On 10/26/2016 09:55 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote:

Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2016, 08:07 +0200 schrieb Michael Berger:

Dear developers,
I am forwarding my initial e-mail to you because I found that the
behavior described is not specific to classicthesis.
Other document classes (I checked Komascript Article and Article
Standard) show a similar behavior. That makes me believe it is a LyX
2.2.2 , 2.2.x  etc. issue.
Can you help, please?

Michael, you should know by now that we need a minimal example LyX file
to reproduce the error. Screenshots are not much useful.

Jürgen


Michael
Jürgen, this time you taught me a  clear lesson - I will remember it, 
for sure!:-D
I had the mini example ready to be sent and - as always - I reassembled 
what I was about to do.

And then I starred at this line in the Latex preamble:

\def\nompreamble{\addcontentsline{toc}{section}{\nomname}\markboth{\nomname}{\nomname}}

And that looked so bloody guilty!
I removed it and the problem was solved, that is the extra useless.
Don't asked me why and how it got there - I do not recall!
Is it of any use or may I scrap it forever?

Sorry again and thanks for your continuing patience!
Michael


nomencl.lyx
Description: application/lyx
@comment{x-kbibtex-encoding=utf-8}

% % % % % This file was created with JabRef 2.10.

@article{ReeGar03,
	author = {Rees, Bronwen and Garnsey, Elizabeth},
	journal = {Gender, Work \& Organization},
	number = {5},
	pages = {551–578},
	title = {Analysing competence: Gender and identity at work},
	volume = {10},
	year = {2003}
}

Re: Fwd: Nomenclature in TOC different/unexpected in LyX2.1 vs Lyx2,2.2

2016-10-26 Thread Jürgen Spitzmüller 
Am Mittwoch, den 26.10.2016, 08:07 +0200 schrieb Michael Berger:
> Dear developers,
> I am forwarding my initial e-mail to you because I found that the
> behavior described is not specific to classicthesis.
> Other document classes (I checked Komascript Article and Article
> Standard) show a similar behavior. That makes me believe it is a LyX
> 2.2.2 , 2.2.x  etc. issue.
> Can you help, please?

Michael, you should know by now that we need a minimal example LyX file
to reproduce the error. Screenshots are not much useful.

Jürgen

> Michael
> 

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Fwd: Nomenclature in TOC different/unexpected in LyX2.1 vs Lyx2,2.2

2016-10-25 Thread Michael Berger 

Dear developers,

I am forwarding my initial e-mail to you because I found that the 
behavior described is not specific to classicthesis.


Other document classes (I checked Komascript Article and Article 
Standard) show a similar behavior. That makes me believe it is a LyX 
2.2.2 , 2.2.x  etc. issue.


Can you help, please?

Michael



 Forwarded Message 
Subject: 	Nomenclature in TOC different/unexpected in LyX2.1/CLT4.1 vs 
Lyx2,2.2/CLT4.2

Date:   Tue, 25 Oct 2016 11:03:00 +0200
From:   Michael Berger 
To: lyx-users 



Dear List,

The screenshot shows my code in Lyx 2.1/Classicthesis4.1;  in the table 
of contents it produces exactly what is desired:


Nomenclature and Glossary 142

The same codeentered in Lyx 2.2.2/Classicthesis4.2(biblatex_biber) 
produces in the table of content:


Nomenclature and Glossary 37

   Nomenclature and Glossary 39 (the document is double-sided)

Here, if I replace 'Nomenclature and Glossary' by 'Nomenclature' in the 
second code line I get:


Nomenclature 37

   Nomenclature and Glossary 39

Page 37 has some text from the preceding section but absolutely nothing 
else. Page 38 is the back of page 37 and hence is completely empty. So, 
it looks as if the word 'Nomenclature' is just showing in the TOC 
without effecting the rest of the PDf document in .


Needless to say that I have been playing around a lot but could not get 
rid of that "undesired" and IMHO useless extra TOC entry.


Any comment? Is this a Lyx issue?

Thanks and cheers,

Michael