INHERIT_LANGUAGE
This has not been defined for a long, long time. Any objections to just removing this code commented out by this define then? -- Lgb
Re: INHERIT_LANGUAGE
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:30:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Any objections to just removing this code commented out by this define then? ooi can you explain : 1) what it used to do 2) what we do now instead thanks john -- Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the labels. - Jonathan S. Shapiro
Re: INHERIT_LANGUAGE
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:30:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | Any objections to just removing this code commented out by this define | then? | | ooi can you explain : | | 1) what it used to do | 2) what we do now instead I have no idea, ... to me now this is just cruft... I think it was Dekel that played with this? -- Lgb
INHERIT_LANGUAGE
This has not been defined for a long, long time. Any objections to just removing this code commented out by this define then? -- Lgb
Re: INHERIT_LANGUAGE
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:30:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Any objections to just removing this code commented out by this define > then? ooi can you explain : 1) what it used to do 2) what we do now instead thanks john -- "Take the ideas you find useful. Try not to get hung up on the labels." - Jonathan S. Shapiro
Re: INHERIT_LANGUAGE
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:30:07AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > Any objections to just removing this code commented out by this define | > then? | | ooi can you explain : | | 1) what it used to do | 2) what we do now instead I have no idea, ... to me now this is just cruft... I think it was Dekel that played with this? -- Lgb
INHERIT_LANGUAGE
what's the situation here ? john -- It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims. - Aristotle
INHERIT_LANGUAGE
what's the situation here ? john -- "It is unbecoming for young men to utter maxims." - Aristotle
