Re: Long mails
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:47:58PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote: Is this a sample mail from Andre to show us how long a message he is willing to tolerate? Seriously, just send me a note when you guys agreed on some limit. I would vote more than 50K, if not all the way to 500. An Allan-length mail with a 20K or 30K patch might get over the 50K limit. -Amir
Re: Long mails
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 03:47:58PM -0500, Mate Wierdl wrote: > Is this a sample mail from Andre to show us how long a message he is > willing to tolerate? > > Seriously, just send me a note when you guys agreed on some limit. I would vote more than 50K, if not all the way to 500. An Allan-length mail with a 20K or 30K patch might get over the 50K limit. -Amir
Re: Long mails
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Mate Wierdl wrote: On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all the time... If there is a need, I can certainly restrict the size of the posts. Any too large post would be bounced back to the poster. Just tell me what a reasonable limit is. 500K comes to mind... Anything larger can be posted on a webpage instead. I'd be more inclinded to say 50kB. That way my long posts will still get through ;-) and most patch submissions also but someone on a modem won't have to wait any longer than about 10-30 seconds for any given email to download. Allan. (ARRae)
Re: Long mails
Re: Long mails
Is this a sample mail from Andre to show us how long a message he is willing to tolerate? Seriously, just send me a note when you guys agreed on some limit. Mate On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:32:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Re: Long mails
On Wed, 18 Apr 2001, Mate Wierdl wrote: > On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > > > It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to > > the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all > > the time... > > If there is a need, I can certainly restrict the size of the posts. Any too > large post would be bounced back to the poster. Just tell me what a > reasonable limit is. 500K comes to mind... Anything larger can be posted on > a webpage instead. I'd be more inclinded to say 50kB. That way my long posts will still get through ;-) and most patch submissions also but someone on a modem won't have to wait any longer than about 10-30 seconds for any given email to download. Allan. (ARRae)
Re: Long mails
Re: Long mails
Is this a sample mail from Andre to show us how long a message he is willing to tolerate? Seriously, just send me a note when you guys agreed on some limit. Mate On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 10:32:31AM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote:
Re: Long mails
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all the time... If there is a need, I can certainly restrict the size of the posts. Any too large post would be bounced back to the poster. Just tell me what a reasonable limit is. 500K comes to mind... Anything larger can be posted on a webpage instead. Mate
Re: Long mails
On Tue, Apr 17, 2001 at 04:32:45PM +0200, Andre Poenitz wrote: > > It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to > the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all > the time... If there is a need, I can certainly restrict the size of the posts. Any too large post would be bounced back to the poster. Just tell me what a reasonable limit is. 500K comes to mind... Anything larger can be posted on a webpage instead. Mate
Long mails
It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all the time... Andre' -- Andr Pnitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Long mails
Andre Poenitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to | the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all | the time... What's the limit on a "large" mail? 1k 10k 100k? 1M? -- Lgb
Long mails
It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all the time... Andre' -- André Pönitz . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Long mails
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | It would be really nice if we could refrain from posting large mails to | the list. Not everybody has a cheap high-speed connection to the net all | the time... What's the limit on a "large" mail? 1k 10k 100k? 1M? -- Lgb
