Re: Mathed: "dot" as empty base is back. Why?
On Thu, Apr 11, 2002 at 05:31:58PM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > Do you need another plea? No... hm... th 'if' was still there, but commented out. Don't ask why. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: Mathed: "dot" as empty base is back. Why?
Andre Poenitz wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:45:10AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > > In Mathed I found the "dot", indicating empty base, has returned. > > The earlier solution was actually quite cute: the dot was only visible > > when inside the math-environment; once outside, the dot disappeared. > > > Now the dot is there again permanently. Why has that changed? > > I have not touched this in the last few weeks so whatever the reason was, I > don't remember it. > > However, changing this to anything else is easy. So if you can convince > me that nobody except me likes the dots, I'll remove them. Please remember that I once managed to convince you to do something about the "dot": the beautiful solution that made the dot disappear when outside the bleu mathed-box ! Do you need another plea? Cheers, Rob.
Re: Mathed: "dot" as empty base is back. Why?
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:45:10AM +0900, R. Lahaye wrote: > In Mathed I found the "dot", indicating empty base, has returned. > The earlier solution was actually quite cute: the dot was only visible > when inside the math-environment; once outside, the dot disappeared. > > Now the dot is there again permanently. Why has that changed? I have not touched this in the last few weeks so whatever the reason was, I don't remember it. However, changing this to anything else is easy. So if you can convince me that nobody except me likes the dots, I'll remove them. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Mathed: "dot" as empty base is back. Why?
Hi, In Mathed I found the "dot", indicating empty base, has returned. The earlier solution was actually quite cute: the dot was only visible when inside the math-environment; once outside, the dot disappeared. Now the dot is there again permanently. Why has that changed? The dot confuses me, since it looks like an "end-of-sentence" period. Regards, Rob.
