No koma-script in FC5? (was Re: lyx141: docs, 1, part 2)
Hartmut == Hartmut Haase [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hartmut send me some updated docs last week that do not use koma-script anymore. Hartmut Hello Jean-marc, I do not forget you, but I have a question: what are the distributions that do not provide scrbook? This could be a problem since our official docs use it. Hartmut because koma-script is not under GPL, Linux-Fedora Core5 may Hartmut not deliver it. Could somebody confirm or infirm? I am surprised that we did not have other reports about that. The copy of koma-script I have seems to be under the LPPL. JMarc
Re: No koma-script in FC5? (was Re: lyx141: docs, 1, part 2)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Could somebody confirm or infirm? I am surprised that we did not have other reports about that. The copy of koma-script I have seems to be under the LPPL. It is in Fedora Core 5: ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/fedora-core/5/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/tetex-latex-3.0-17.i386.rpm If the LPPL was considered nonfree by fedora it would not even have LaTeX, and we would for sure have heard of it. Georg
Re: No koma-script in FC5? (was Re: lyx141: docs, 1, part 2)
On Thursday 18 May 2006 14:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Could somebody confirm or infirm? I am surprised that we did not have other reports about that. The copy of koma-script I have seems to be under the LPPL. AS Georg said. I am using FC5 and certainly koma is in this system: $ rpm -ql tetex-latex | grep koma /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/DIN.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/DINmtext.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/KOMAold.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/SN.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/SNleft.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scraddr.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrartcl.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrbook.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrdate.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrlettr.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrlfile.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrlttr2.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrpage.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrpage2.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrreprt.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrtime.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/typearea.sty JMarc -- José Abílio
Re: No koma-script in FC5? (was Re: lyx141: docs, 1, part 2)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Could somebody confirm or infirm? I am surprised that we did not have other reports about that. The copy of koma-script I have seems to be under the LPPL. Maybe Hartmut is mixing up something. In fact KOMA-Script was not distributed by MikTeX for some time due to licencing issues (AFAIR KOMA requests that the bundle must be distributed as a whole, and in MikTeX some docs where left out). Don't know what the actual status is, though. Jürgen
No koma-script in FC5? (was Re: lyx141: docs, 1, part 2)
> "Hartmut" == Hartmut Haase <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Hartmut send me some updated docs last week that do not use koma-script anymore. Hartmut> Hello Jean-marc, >> I do not forget you, but I have a question: what are the >> distributions that do not provide scrbook? This could be a problem >> since our official docs use it. Hartmut> because koma-script is not under GPL, Linux-Fedora Core5 may Hartmut> not deliver it. Could somebody confirm or infirm? I am surprised that we did not have other reports about that. The copy of koma-script I have seems to be under the LPPL. JMarc
Re: No koma-script in FC5? (was Re: lyx141: docs, 1, part 2)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Could somebody confirm or infirm? I am surprised that we did not have > other reports about that. The copy of koma-script I have seems to be > under the LPPL. It is in Fedora Core 5: ftp://sunsite.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/pub/Linux/fedora-core/5/i386/os/Fedora/RPMS/tetex-latex-3.0-17.i386.rpm If the LPPL was considered nonfree by fedora it would not even have LaTeX, and we would for sure have heard of it. Georg
Re: No koma-script in FC5? (was Re: lyx141: docs, 1, part 2)
On Thursday 18 May 2006 14:35, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Could somebody confirm or infirm? I am surprised that we did not have > other reports about that. The copy of koma-script I have seems to be > under the LPPL. AS Georg said. I am using FC5 and certainly koma is in this system: $ rpm -ql tetex-latex | grep koma /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/DIN.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/DINmtext.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/KOMAold.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/SN.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/SNleft.lco /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scraddr.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrartcl.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrbook.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrdate.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrlettr.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrlfile.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrlttr2.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrpage.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrpage2.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrreprt.cls /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/scrtime.sty /usr/share/texmf/tex/latex/koma-script/typearea.sty > JMarc -- José Abílio
Re: No koma-script in FC5? (was Re: lyx141: docs, 1, part 2)
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Could somebody confirm or infirm? I am surprised that we did not have > other reports about that. The copy of koma-script I have seems to be > under the LPPL. Maybe Hartmut is mixing up something. In fact KOMA-Script was not distributed by MikTeX for some time due to licencing issues (AFAIR KOMA requests that the bundle must be distributed as a whole, and in MikTeX some docs where left out). Don't know what the actual status is, though. Jürgen
