Re: Qt Runtime Dependency?
Daniel Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Georg Baum wrote: | qt is needed also at run time. | | Thanks both Georg and Lars for the speedy response (especially when compared | to my laggardly thanks). A corollary to this question, the need for which, | embarassingly, only just occurred to me, is whether or not xforms is | required at runtime or not? It would seem obvious to me that it would be, | but I want to be sure... Just change your original question and the answers to use xforms instead of qt and you have your answer. -- Lgb
Re: Qt Runtime Dependency?
Daniel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Georg Baum wrote: | > qt is needed also at run time. | | Thanks both Georg and Lars for the speedy response (especially when compared | to my laggardly thanks). A corollary to this question, the need for which, | embarassingly, only just occurred to me, is whether or not xforms is | required at runtime or not? It would seem obvious to me that it would be, | but I want to be sure... Just change your original question and the answers to use xforms instead of qt and you have your answer. -- Lgb
Re: Qt Runtime Dependency?
Georg Baum wrote: qt is needed also at run time. Thanks both Georg and Lars for the speedy response (especially when compared to my laggardly thanks). A corollary to this question, the need for which, embarassingly, only just occurred to me, is whether or not xforms is required at runtime or not? It would seem obvious to me that it would be, but I want to be sure... Dan
Re: Qt Runtime Dependency?
Georg Baum wrote: > qt is needed also at run time. Thanks both Georg and Lars for the speedy response (especially when compared to my laggardly thanks). A corollary to this question, the need for which, embarassingly, only just occurred to me, is whether or not xforms is required at runtime or not? It would seem obvious to me that it would be, but I want to be sure... Dan
Re: Qt Runtime Dependency?
Daniel Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Hi list, | Another query relating to my ebuild work. The creator of the last ebuild | (for 1.4.0pre3) has set Qt up as a compile-time dependency only but has | left a note saying he is unsure if this is accurate. Does LyX 1.4.0pre5 | (and we're assuming Qt is being used) need Qt to run or only to compile? complile and link. So if you use dynamic linking you also need it to run. -- Lgb
Re: Qt Runtime Dependency?
Daniel Watkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi list, | Another query relating to my ebuild work. The creator of the last ebuild | (for 1.4.0pre3) has set Qt up as a compile-time dependency only but has | left a note saying he is unsure if this is accurate. Does LyX 1.4.0pre5 | (and we're assuming Qt is being used) need Qt to run or only to compile? complile and link. So if you use dynamic linking you also need it to run. -- Lgb
