Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Wed, Oct 30, 2002 at 10:56:50AM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Yes, it will be used to fix all the stupid bugs we'll add in 1.3.0. > And 1.3.2 will be used also for this. See 1.2.1: I accepted too much > new code in it, and it had 3 new bad bug. This is definitely bad. Fair enough john -- ""All the people we like are We, and everyone else is They." - Kipling
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
> "John" == John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: John> On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:49:47PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes John> wrote: >> I belive this would be a nice feature for 1.4, I am very reluctant >> of John> Can you remind me of the versioning scheme ? Are we having a John> 1.3.1 ? Yes, it will be used to fix all the stupid bugs we'll add in 1.3.0. And 1.3.2 will be used also for this. See 1.2.1: I accepted too much new code in it, and it had 3 new bad bug. This is definitely bad. JMarc
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 07:49:47PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > I belive this would be a nice feature for 1.4, I am very reluctant of Can you remind me of the versioning scheme ? Are we having a 1.3.1 ? The 1.4 is the one that's coming out in about 2004, right ? If we are lucky. > including it in 1.3.0, especially since I guess that a lot of I agree it's probably not a good idea for 1.3.0. It is reasonably high-risk, for one. > improvements could be added to it. (even if it works nicely now.) Yes, there's a few warts. And of course some ugly code that needs cleanups in the core before it goes away. regards john -- "All photography is accurate - none of it is truth." - Richard Avedon
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:09:32PM +, John Levon wrote: > >> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: >> > > http://movementarian.org/ltxpost-0.1a.tar.gz > | btw, screenshot : http://movementarian.org/lc.png (ignore the pink ;) I belive this would be a nice feature for 1.4, I am very reluctant of including it in 1.3.0, especially since I guess that a lot of improvements could be added to it. (even if it works nicely now.) -- Lgb
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 17:45, John Levon wrote: > > btw, screenshot : http://movementarian.org/lc.png (ignore the pink ;) Impressive if I may say so. BTW you mean salmon not pink. ;-) > john -- José Abílio
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 05:09:32PM +, John Levon wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > > > http://movementarian.org/ltxpost-0.1a.tar.gz btw, screenshot : http://movementarian.org/lc.png (ignore the pink ;) john -- "All photography is accurate - none of it is truth." - Richard Avedon
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 08:12:29AM +0100, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > > http://movementarian.org/ltxpost-0.1a.tar.gz > > Sure this is right? Yes. Upgrade wget. john -- "All photography is accurate - none of it is truth." - Richard Avedon
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Angus> On Tuesday 29 October 2002 10:38 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > is a >> (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple > revision >> tracking mode for LyX. It's against 1.2 CVS. >> >> I still can't compile 1.2 CVS Angus> Me neither. In my case it's because I have autoconf 2.54, Angus> leading to: Angus> In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:390, from Angus> ../../intl/ngettext.c:27: /usr/include/sys/types.h:71: warning: Angus> empty declaration Angus> This got fixed in 1.3, but apparently the fix wasn't backported Angus> :-( If only I knew what the fix was... JMarc
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:09:28AM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > If you post me (privately) your configure script,
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 10:55 am, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > > "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > >> is a (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple > >> revision tracking mode for LyX. It's against 1.2 CVS. > > Andre> I still can't compile 1.2 CVS > > I have to admit that I do not understand why 1.2.2cvs > configure script does not work with autoconf 2.5x (on some > systems only) but 1.3.0's version does work... > > JMarc If you post me (privately) your configure script, I could ignore that problem and get on and compile/test this zombies-fix... Angus
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Tuesday 29 October 2002 10:38 am, Andre Poenitz wrote: > On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > > is a (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple > > revision tracking mode for LyX. It's against 1.2 CVS. > > I still can't compile 1.2 CVS Me neither. In my case it's because I have autoconf 2.54, leading to: In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:390, from ../../intl/ngettext.c:27: /usr/include/sys/types.h:71: warning: empty declaration This got fixed in 1.3, but apparently the fix wasn't backported :-( This means I can't test out my zombies-fix... Angus
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: >> is a (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple >> revision tracking mode for LyX. It's against 1.2 CVS. Andre> I still can't compile 1.2 CVS I have to admit that I do not understand why 1.2.2cvs configure script does not work with autoconf 2.5x (on some systems only) but 1.3.0's version does work... JMarc
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > is a (rather large) in-progress patch to implement a simple revision > tracking mode for LyX. It's against 1.2 CVS. I still can't compile 1.2 CVS Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
Re: [PATCH][RFC] Revision tracking
On Mon, Oct 28, 2002 at 11:27:38PM +, John Levon wrote: > http://movementarian.org/ltxpost-0.1a.tar.gz Sure this is right? Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
