Re: [PATCH] bug 3862: Inconsistency of appendix with child documents
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:00:33 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: IMO this could go in 1.5.0, although 1.5.1 would not be a big problem (cosmetic issue). JMarc Last time that Abdel propose this it had some problem. Has this been fixed? If yes then OK. -- José Abílio
Re: [PATCH] bug 3862: Inconsistency of appendix with child documents
José == José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: José Last time that Abdel propose this it had some problem. Has this José been fixed? Don't you see how my proposed solution is elegant? It solves all known and unknown problems! José If yes then OK. Thanks. JMarc
Re: [PATCH] bug 3862: Inconsistency of appendix with child documents
José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:00:33 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: IMO this could go in 1.5.0, although 1.5.1 would not be a big problem (cosmetic issue). JMarc Last time that Abdel propose this it had some problem. Has this been fixed? My first proposal was different and hackish. This proposal from JMarc is much better I admit :-) Abdel.
Re: [PATCH] bug 3862: Inconsistency of appendix with child documents
José == José Matos [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: José If yes then OK. Applied. Jmarc
Re: [PATCH] bug 3862: Inconsistency of appendix with child documents
On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:00:33 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > IMO this could go in 1.5.0, although 1.5.1 would not be a big problem > (cosmetic issue). > > JMarc Last time that Abdel propose this it had some problem. Has this been fixed? If yes then OK. -- José Abílio
Re: [PATCH] bug 3862: Inconsistency of appendix with child documents
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> Last time that Abdel propose this it had some problem. Has this José> been fixed? Don't you see how my proposed solution is elegant? It solves all known and unknown problems! José> If yes then OK. Thanks. JMarc
Re: [PATCH] bug 3862: Inconsistency of appendix with child documents
José Matos wrote: On Wednesday 11 July 2007 13:00:33 Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: IMO this could go in 1.5.0, although 1.5.1 would not be a big problem (cosmetic issue). JMarc Last time that Abdel propose this it had some problem. Has this been fixed? My first proposal was different and hackish. This proposal from JMarc is much better I admit :-) Abdel.
Re: [PATCH] bug 3862: Inconsistency of appendix with child documents
> "José" == José Matos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: José> If yes then OK. Applied. Jmarc