Re: [patch] undo/redo

2003-06-04 Thread Andre Poenitz 
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 01:55:01PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> No... (well yes... but)
> 
> I'd like all the NO_STD_LIST stuff to be removed in a patch of its own
> first.  I'll do that if you like.

Would be kind.

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have,
nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson or B. Franklin or both...)

Re: [patch] undo/redo

2003-06-04 Thread Lars Gullik Bjønnes 
Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

| This brings back undo (and redo...) to a somewhat working state.
| 
| The most prominent flaw is that the cursor is placed at the beginning
| of the first paragraph touched by the undo in the main paragraph list.
| 
| This means undo currently leaves all minipages/tabulars/whatever
| [Pretty much the same situation as we had with math all the time, so
| I know this is annyoing...]
| 
| Internally I had to change the ParIterator container from stack to vector
| as I needed access to the 'bottom' as well.
| 
| This can be reverted as soon as we have 'per inset undo' back.
| 
| Ok?

No... (well yes... but)

I'd like all the NO_STD_LIST stuff to be removed in a patch of its own
first.  I'll do that if you like.

-- 
Lgb