Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
Am 30.11.2012 20:39, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: This is fixed in qt 4.8.4. It may be worth to release updated mac and windows binaries (after testing of course) I will do this, but 4.8.4 has not yet been released. I could not grab it. But is it really necessary to provide a new Windows installer release? I see only this particular bug that harmed LyX and it is only a cosmetic one. regards Uwe
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
Am 30.11.2012 20:39, schrieb Uwe Stöhr: This is fixed in qt 4.8.4. It may be worth to release updated mac and windows binaries (after testing of course) I will do this, but 4.8.4 has not yet been released. I could not grab it. But is it really necessary to provide a new Windows installer release? I see only this particular bug that harmed LyX and it is only a cosmetic one. regards Uwe
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
Am 29.11.2012 22:17, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: This is fixed in qt 4.8.4. It may be worth to release updated mac and windows binaries (after testing of course) I will do this, but 4.8.4 has not yet been released. regards Uwe
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
Am 29.11.2012 22:17, schrieb Jean-Marc Lasgouttes: This is fixed in qt 4.8.4. It may be worth to release updated mac and windows binaries (after testing of course) I will do this, but 4.8.4 has not yet been released. regards Uwe
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
Le 17/10/12 16:46, Kornel Benko a écrit : I get three, both for \dots and \cdots. Qt 4.8.2 as well. Same here, three both, Qt 4.8.2 This is fixed in qt 4.8.4. It may be worth to release updated mac and windows binaries (after testing of course) - Fixed inconsistent rounding of square cap pens [QTBUG-26013] JMarc
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
Le 17/10/12 16:46, Kornel Benko a écrit : > I get three, both for \dots and \cdots. Qt 4.8.2 as well. Same here, three both, Qt 4.8.2 This is fixed in qt 4.8.4. It may be worth to release updated mac and windows binaries (after testing of course) - Fixed inconsistent rounding of square cap pens [QTBUG-26013] JMarc
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
On 10/17/2012 04:11 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: LyX Ticket Tracker wrote: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots +-- Reporter: MarkBravington | Owner: poenitz Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: mathed | Version: 2.0.4 Severity: normal | Resolution: Keywords: | +-- Is there anyone around who can see rendering of three dots instead of two dots when typing \cdots in mathed? The code looks correct and unchanged compared to older versions where it worked. Two dots here. I noticed this recently. Qt is 4.8.2. rh
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
2012/10/17 Richard Heck: Is there anyone around who can see rendering of three dots instead of two dots when typing \cdots in mathed? The code looks correct and unchanged compared to older versions where it worked. Two dots here. I noticed this recently. Qt is 4.8.2. I get three, both for \dots and \cdots. Qt 4.8.2 as well. Jürgen
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
2012/10/17 Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org: I get three, both for \dots and \cdots. Qt 4.8.2 as well. However, scaling matters! I have 200 dpi. If I scale down, I get two dots at ~140 dpi and one dot at ~100 dpi. At some scale rates (such as 150), the dots even disappear completely. Jürgen
Re: Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
Am Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2012 um 16:37:27, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller sp...@lyx.org 2012/10/17 Richard Heck: Is there anyone around who can see rendering of three dots instead of two dots when typing \cdots in mathed? The code looks correct and unchanged compared to older versions where it worked. Two dots here. I noticed this recently. Qt is 4.8.2. I get three, both for \dots and \cdots. Qt 4.8.2 as well. Jürgen Same here, three both, Qt 4.8.2 Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
On 10/17/2012 04:11 AM, Pavel Sanda wrote: LyX Ticket Tracker wrote: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots +-- Reporter: MarkBravington | Owner: poenitz Type: defect | Status: new Priority: normal | Milestone: Component: mathed | Version: 2.0.4 Severity: normal | Resolution: Keywords: | +-- Is there anyone around who can see rendering of three dots instead of two dots when typing \cdots in mathed? The code looks correct and unchanged compared to older versions where it worked. Two dots here. I noticed this recently. Qt is 4.8.2. rh
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
2012/10/17 Richard Heck: >> Is there anyone around who can see rendering of three dots instead of two >> dots when typing \cdots in mathed? The code looks correct and unchanged >> compared to older versions where it worked. > > Two dots here. I noticed this recently. Qt is 4.8.2. I get three, both for \dots and \cdots. Qt 4.8.2 as well. Jürgen
Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
2012/10/17 Jürgen Spitzmüller: > I get three, both for \dots and \cdots. Qt 4.8.2 as well. However, scaling matters! I have 200 dpi. If I scale down, I get two dots at ~140 dpi and one dot at ~100 dpi. At some scale rates (such as 150), the dots even disappear completely. Jürgen
Re: Re: Qt issue? (Re: #8374: missing/bad display of dots and cdots)
Am Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2012 um 16:37:27, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller> 2012/10/17 Richard Heck: > >> Is there anyone around who can see rendering of three dots instead of two > >> dots when typing \cdots in mathed? The code looks correct and unchanged > >> compared to older versions where it worked. > > > > Two dots here. I noticed this recently. Qt is 4.8.2. > > I get three, both for \dots and \cdots. Qt 4.8.2 as well. > > Jürgen Same here, three both, Qt 4.8.2 Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.