Am Sonntag, 16. September 2012 um 16:19:50, schrieb Pavel Sanda
> Kornel Benko wrote:
> > why not "tab-hide" ? For the user, it should do exact this.
>
> Because it also closes the buffer in certain cases. It's hybrid
> between hide and close. P
Sure.
We are talking about change in function handling, don't we? I was referring
the point 3 in the patch lyx-close-tab.patch
Citing Tommaso:
> > 3) Typing `close-tab' in the minibuffer only closes the current WA
> >In all cases, if other WAs exist showing the same buffer, they are not
> >closed; the user is not queried about saving changes in such a case.
> >Only when the last WA is closed, user is queried and buffer is closed as
> >well.
What I would like is hiding even if it were the last WA.
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
