Re: Re: translations, category
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012 um 09:45:29, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Richard Heck wrote: > > Sectioning sounds right to me. > > Kornel, can you do the change yourself? I will. > Jürgen Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Re: translations, category
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 um 13:49:32, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Kornel Benko wrote: > > > "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the > > > problem. > > > > OK, please. > > I'd like to hear the opinon of a native speaker first. According to LaTeX companion there are sectioning commands. So ... > > I missed this one. But the sorting here is only alphabetic (in the > > translated language) and only inside a category. (My wish was to sort > > categories) > > I see. This makes sense, but it is in the responsibility of the layout > maintainers. There might be arguments for different orders in different > classes. > > However, you can propose concrete changes and see if there are objections. You mean inside some concrete layout-files? I had in mind to define somewhere a category-priority, (may it be in preferences, or some category-config.layout file) This way there would be no change to existing layouts. In case of nothing defined, we may stick to current behaviour. > Jürgen > Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Re: translations, category
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012 um 13:31:41, schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > Kornel Benko wrote: > > 1.) Could we please rename > > Category Section > > to > > Category Section[[structure]] > > > > That way we may translate it e.g. in German to "Gliederung" instead > > of "Abschnitt". > > "Sectioning" strikes me the better English term, and it would solve the > problem. OK, please. > > 2.) The position of categories inside the available styles varies between > > different layouts. This takes getting used to. > > We could make it more consistent through some sort of sorting, or > > define the order like a.) everything without category > > b.) FrontMatter > > c.) Lists > > d.) Section[[structure]] > > e.) Unnumbered > > f.) BackMatter > > Note that the order in the layout determines the order in the combo. Since > you > can switch off ordering by category in the preferences, the order you propose > might not be the desired one in this case. I missed this one. But the sorting here is only alphabetic (in the translated language) and only inside a category. (My wish was to sort categories) > Jürgen > Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
