Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Helge Hafting wrote: support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/usr/src/lyx-devel/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: > multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_2' This is boot::bind stuff, most probably from the old boost version. Delete your build directory and recompile everything, then it should work. Georg
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | namespace)::_3' | support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp:114: | first defined here | support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/usr/src/lyx-devel/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: | multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_2' | support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/function/function_base.hpp:689: | first defined here | support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/usr/src/lyx-devel/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: | multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_1' | support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/signals/slot.hpp:72: | first defined here | collect2: ld returned 1 exit status | make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 | make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-devel/src' | make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-devel/src' | make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 | make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-devel/src' | make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 | | Before this, there is tons of boost stuff "first defined here" as well | as "multiple definitions of anonymous namespace" | | I checked with svn status & diff that there is nothing in my tree | that shouldn't be there. You should make sure that you have a really clean tree, no old built files. 'make distclean' should be enough. (but a ./autogen.sh + reconfig is probably required.) -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Georg Baum wrote: Helge Hafting wrote: support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/usr/src/lyx-devel/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_2' This is boot::bind stuff, most probably from the old boost version. Delete your build directory and recompile everything, then it should work. Tried to make clean & distclean, ran autogen.sh and configure, still got similiar messages: support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp:114: first defined here support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/usr/src/lyx-devel/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_2' support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/function/function_base.hpp:689: first defined here support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/usr/src/lyx-devel/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_1' support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/signals/slot.hpp:72: first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [lyx-qt] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-devel/src' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-devel/src' make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/lyx-devel/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 "First defined here" and "multiple definitions of anonymous namespace" filled the scrollback buffer. Helge Hafting
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Georg Baum wrote: | | >Helge Hafting wrote: | > | >support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/usr/src/lyx-devel/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: | > | >>multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_2' | >> | > | >This is boot::bind stuff, most probably from the old boost version. Delete | >your build directory and recompile everything, then it should work. | > | Tried to make clean & distclean, | ran autogen.sh and configure, | still got similiar messages: | | support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/detail/sp_counted_base_gcc_x86.hpp:114: Hmm very strange. On my FC4 box I have no problems. -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Georg Baum wrote: > This is boot::bind stuff, most probably from the old boost version. Delete > your build directory and recompile everything, then it should work. I have done that (deleted everything and done svn up) and it still does not compile :-( Jürgen
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | I checked with svn status & diff that there is nothing in my tree | that shouldn't be there. You should make sure that you have a really clean tree, no old built files. 'make distclean' should be enough. (but a ./autogen.sh + reconfig is probably required.) Make distclean (+autogen+reconfig) does not help. I get tons of namespace errors, both on i386 and amd64. Could something be slipping through distclean? This is the config I normally use on i386, on amd64 I use -Os instead of -O2, it cuts the text part down to a third! ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-frontend=qt --with-gnu-ld --with-qt-includes=/usr/include/qt3 --enable-optimization=-O2 --disable-stdlib-debug --disable-assertions I'll try checking out the complete tree in an empty directory, to see if distclean is missing something. Helge Hafting
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | >| I checked with svn status & diff that there is nothing in my tree | >| that shouldn't be there. | > | >You should make sure that you have a really clean tree, no old built | >files. | > | >'make distclean' should be enough. | >(but a ./autogen.sh + reconfig is probably required.) | > | Make distclean (+autogen+reconfig) does not help. | I get tons of namespace errors, both on i386 and amd64. | Could something be slipping through distclean? Perhaps... I have no problems on amd64. (gcc 4.0.2) -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | >| I checked with svn status & diff that there is nothing in my tree | >| that shouldn't be there. | > | >You should make sure that you have a really clean tree, no old built | >files. | > | >'make distclean' should be enough. | >(but a ./autogen.sh + reconfig is probably required.) | > | Make distclean (+autogen+reconfig) does not help. | I get tons of namespace errors, both on i386 and amd64. | Could something be slipping through distclean? Perhaps... I have no problems on amd64. (gcc 4.0.2) I did a new svn checkout, and the only difference from "make distclean" was lots of .svn/entries which I assume is just bookkeeping for svn, and the two files lyx-devel/autom4te.cache/requests lyx-devel/autom4te.cache/traces.0 building the freshly checked out tree failed in the same way as the "distclean" tree. The messages were the same, namespace trouble all over the place. When it works flawlessly for you, do you start from a clean tree, or do you have "leftovers" that happen to make things work? Compiler versions: gcc (GCC) 4.0.3 20060212 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-9) g++ (GCC) 4.0.3 20060212 (prerelease) (Debian 4.0.2-9) GNU ld version 2.16.91 20060118 Debian GNU/Linux The problem is the same on amd64 and i386. The configuration command: ./configure --prefix=/usr/local --with-frontend=qt --with-gnu-ld --with-qt-includes=/usr/include/qt3 --enable-optimization=-O2 --disable-stdlib-debug --disable-assertions configure itself detects no problems, and tells me to use "make" to build lyx. "make" compiles everything and then the linking messes up. Helge Hafting
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > > This is boot::bind stuff, most probably from the old boost version. > > Delete your build directory and recompile everything, then it should > > work. > > I have done that (deleted everything and done svn up) and it still does not > compile :-( It does not even compile a fresh checked out version of HEAD [1]. gcc version 4.0.2 20050901 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6 autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 Jürgen [1] zillions of: [...] support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/home/juergen/lyx/lyx-fresh/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_3' support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/signals/slot.hpp:99: first defined here support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/home/juergen/lyx/lyx-fresh/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_2' support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/optional/optional.hpp:546: first defined here support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/home/juergen/lyx/lyx-fresh/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_1' support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/signals/slot.hpp:72: first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: Georg Baum wrote: This is boot::bind stuff, most probably from the old boost version. Delete your build directory and recompile everything, then it should work. I have done that (deleted everything and done svn up) and it still does not compile :-( It does not even compile a fresh checked out version of HEAD [1]. gcc version 4.0.2 20050901 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) automake (GNU automake) 1.9.6 autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.59 Jürgen [1] zillions of: [...] support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/home/juergen/lyx/lyx-fresh/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_3' support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/signals/slot.hpp:99: first defined here support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/home/juergen/lyx/lyx-fresh/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_2' support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/optional/optional.hpp:546: first defined here support/.libs/libsupport.a(lyxtime.o):/home/juergen/lyx/lyx-fresh/src/support/lyxtime.C:22: multiple definition of `(anonymous namespace)::_1' support/.libs/libsupport.a(FileMonitor.o):../../boost/boost/signals/slot.hpp:72: first defined here collect2: ld returned 1 exit status Looks familiar. That's most likely a gcc-4.0.2 "anonymous namespace" bug (exposed mostly by boost): http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24389 Apparently to be fixed in gcc-4.0.3 (when released... soon I hope). -- Rex
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Rex Dieter wrote: > Looks familiar. That's most likely a gcc-4.0.2 "anonymous namespace" > bug (exposed mostly by boost): > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24389 Aha! Thanks for pointing to this. > Apparently to be fixed in gcc-4.0.3 (when released... soon I hope). Hmm. Looks like I'm out of business until then. Jürgen
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Rex Dieter wrote: | > Looks familiar. That's most likely a gcc-4.0.2 "anonymous namespace" | > bug (exposed mostly by boost): | > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24389 | | Aha! Thanks for pointing to this. | | > Apparently to be fixed in gcc-4.0.3 (when released... soon I hope). So probably redhat/fedora has patched gcc to fix this then. | Hmm. Looks like I'm out of business until then. Compile your own gcc ... put it in /opt f.ex. I do that all the time. -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Rex Dieter wrote: | > Looks familiar. That's most likely a gcc-4.0.2 "anonymous namespace" | > bug (exposed mostly by boost): | > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24389 | | Aha! Thanks for pointing to this. | | > Apparently to be fixed in gcc-4.0.3 (when released... soon I hope). So probably redhat/fedora has patched gcc to fix this then. Nope, that's why I knew about the problem due to build failures I saw on fc4/gcc-4.0.2 | Hmm. Looks like I'm out of business until then. Compile your own gcc ... put it in /opt f.ex. I do that all the time. AFAIK, A newer/fixed gcc-4.0.x isn't available, yet. -- Rex
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Nope, that's why I knew about the problem due to build failures I saw | on fc4/gcc-4.0.2 Hmm... so why doesn't I see the same errors? | | > | Hmm. Looks like I'm out of business until then. | > Compile your own gcc ... put it in /opt f.ex. I do that all the time. | | AFAIK, A newer/fixed gcc-4.0.x isn't available, yet. when you build yourself you can get it from svn... -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: Rex Dieter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Nope, that's why I knew about the problem due to build failures I saw | on fc4/gcc-4.0.2 Hmm... so why doesn't I see the same errors? I don't now either with the lyx-1.4.0 (release candidate). yay. I *did* see them when trying to build lyx-1.4.0pre releases with --without-included-boost against boost-1.33.0. -- Rex
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > It does not even compile a fresh checked out version of HEAD [1]. > > gcc version 4.0.2 20050901 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux) This very same compiler (included in SuSE 10.0, rpm is gcc-4.0.2_20050901-3) has no problems here on amd64. Very strange. I ran configure with ../configure --with-frontend=qt --enable-maintainer-mode --with-qt-includes=/usr/lib64/qt3/include --with-qt-libraries=/usr/lib64/qt3/lib64 --with-version-suffix=1.5 --enable-compression-support --enable-stdlib-debug --enable-debug --enable-concept-checks Georg
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Georg Baum wrote: > This very same compiler (included in SuSE 10.0, rpm is > gcc-4.0.2_20050901-3) has no problems here on amd64. Very strange. > > I ran configure with > ../configure --with-frontend=qt --enable-maintainer-mode > --with-qt-includes=/usr/lib64/qt3/include > --with-qt-libraries=/usr/lib64/qt3/lib64 --with-version-suffix=1.5 > --enable-compression-support --enable-stdlib-debug --enable-debug > --enable-concept-checks That's strange indeed. I just tried with the very same options. Still no luck. Jürgen
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Juergen> Georg Baum wrote: >> This very same compiler (included in SuSE 10.0, rpm is >> gcc-4.0.2_20050901-3) has no problems here on amd64. Very strange. >> >> I ran configure with ../configure --with-frontend=qt >> --enable-maintainer-mode --with-qt-includes=/usr/lib64/qt3/include >> --with-qt-libraries=/usr/lib64/qt3/lib64 --with-version-suffix=1.5 >> --enable-compression-support --enable-stdlib-debug --enable-debug >> --enable-concept-checks Juergen> That's strange indeed. I just tried with the very same Juergen> options. Still no luck. Could it be binutils? JMarc
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Could it be binutils? I don't know. I have binutils-2.16.91.0.2-8.4. Georg
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Georg Baum wrote: > > Could it be binutils? > > I don't know. I have binutils-2.16.91.0.2-8.4. I have the same. Jürgen
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Georg Baum wrote: | > > Could it be binutils? | > | > I don't know. I have binutils-2.16.91.0.2-8.4. | | I have the same. binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2-2 here -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 09:27 +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Georg Baum wrote: > > This very same compiler (included in SuSE 10.0, rpm is > > gcc-4.0.2_20050901-3) has no problems here on amd64. Very strange. > > > > I ran configure with > > ../configure --with-frontend=qt --enable-maintainer-mode > > --with-qt-includes=/usr/lib64/qt3/include > > --with-qt-libraries=/usr/lib64/qt3/lib64 --with-version-suffix=1.5 > > --enable-compression-support --enable-stdlib-debug --enable-debug > > --enable-concept-checks > > That's strange indeed. I just tried with the very same options. Still no luck. > > Jürgen Could this be due to a different bug? http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/2003-05/msg00083.html I may have missed this, but do you have an external boost installed? - Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Martin Vermeer wrote: > Could this be due to a different bug? > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/2003-05/msg00083.html Could be. > I may have missed this, but do you have an external boost installed? No. Should I? Jürgen
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 14:57 +0100, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > Could this be due to a different bug? > > > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-prs/2003-05/msg00083.html > > Could be. > > > I may have missed this, but do you have an external boost installed? > > No. Should I? If I understood the bug report correctly, having precompiled headers there could cause this. Apparently not. - Martin signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 16:16 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: > > > I may have missed this, but do you have an external boost installed? > > > > No. Should I? > > If I understood the bug report correctly, having precompiled headers > there could cause this. Apparently not. Any news on this problem? Has anyone on FC4 managed to work around it without compiling their own gcc? John
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
"John C. Spray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 16:16 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: | > > > I may have missed this, but do you have an external boost installed? | > > | > > No. Should I? | > | > If I understood the bug report correctly, having precompiled headers | > there could cause this. Apparently not. | | Any news on this problem? Has anyone on FC4 managed to work around it | without compiling their own gcc? I have kindo forgot what this was about... but I compile and run on FC4 all the time. -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: "John C. Spray" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 16:16 +0200, Martin Vermeer wrote: | > > > I may have missed this, but do you have an external boost installed? | > > | > > No. Should I? | > | > If I understood the bug report correctly, having precompiled headers | > there could cause this. Apparently not. | | Any news on this problem? Has anyone on FC4 managed to work around it | without compiling their own gcc? I have kindo forgot what this was about... but I compile and run on FC4 all the time. It is about some compilers that compile fine, but the link breaks on tons and tons of namespace errors where nothing in boost seems right. One such compiler is g++ 4.0.3 in debian testing. The solution is simple, use g++ 3.3, g++ 4.1 or possibly quite a few other versions. I don't know about FC4, but this is easy enough in debian without compiling a gcc: Just install another version (debian packages several non-conflicting gcc/g++ versions) then select a compiler and compile this way: export CC=gcc-4.1 export CXX=g++-4.1 ./configure . . . make It is a good idea to 'make clean' before changing compiler version. If FC4 don't have any older or newer compilers for you, consider digging up some older rpms? Helge Hafting
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | If FC4 don't have any older or newer compilers for you, consider | digging up some older rpms? FC4 should just work. -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 10:25:04PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | If FC4 don't have any older or newer compilers for you, consider > | digging up some older rpms? > > FC4 should just work. On FC4, I have gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) and I get the namespace/link issue. Maybe your FC4 was updated with a better/newer gcc? ---Kayvan -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan, | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89) http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | my beautiful Queen.| Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 10:25:04PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | If FC4 don't have any older or newer compilers for you, consider | > | digging up some older rpms? | > | > FC4 should just work. | | On FC4, I have gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) and I get | the namespace/link issue. | | Maybe your FC4 was updated with a better/newer gcc? I have the exact same: My x86 box: gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) My x86_64 box: gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) but something must be differnt... but what...? -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:41:45AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 10:25:04PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | > > | > | If FC4 don't have any older or newer compilers for you, consider > | > | digging up some older rpms? > | > > | > FC4 should just work. > | > | On FC4, I have gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) and I get > | the namespace/link issue. > | > | Maybe your FC4 was updated with a better/newer gcc? > > I have the exact same: > > My x86 box: > gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) > > My x86_64 box: > gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) > > but something must be differnt... but what...? Does anyone have any idea why I keep getting those linking errors? My Redhat FC4 x86_64 box is updated and running the same tools as Lars's. I have not been able to do a successful build on my machines for weeks now. ---Kayvan -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan, | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89) http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | my beautiful Queen.| Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
Kayvan A. Sylvan wrote: On Sat, Mar 25, 2006 at 12:41:45AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, Mar 24, 2006 at 10:25:04PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | If FC4 don't have any older or newer compilers for you, consider | > | digging up some older rpms? | > | > FC4 should just work. | | On FC4, I have gcc version 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) and I get | the namespace/link issue. | | Maybe your FC4 was updated with a better/newer gcc? I have the exact same: My x86 box: gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) My x86_64 box: gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) but something must be differnt... but what...? Does anyone have any idea why I keep getting those linking errors? My Redhat FC4 x86_64 box is updated and running the same tools as Lars's. I have not been able to do a successful build on my machines for weeks now. I have switched to gcc 4.1 to avoid this problem. This didn't work with development versions of LyX 1.4, but 1.5svn is fine with this arrangement. Or you can try gcc 3.X. Note that you can have several compilers installed at the same time, so no need to loose your default gcc/g++ 4.0.2. I know of no way to compile LyX with gcc 4.0.2/4.0.3, apparently it works for some and not for most others. Other compiler versions just works. :-) Make sure that you have matching development libraries, debian does this automatically. Helge Hafting
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
"Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > My x86 box: | > gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) | > | > My x86_64 box: | > gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) | > | > but something must be differnt... but what...? | | Does anyone have any idea why I keep getting those linking errors? | | My Redhat FC4 x86_64 box is updated and running the same tools as Lars's. | | I have not been able to do a successful build on my machines for weeks now. You don't have a mixture of i386 and x86_64 packages? -- Lgb
Re: Revision 13302 link errors
On Fri, Apr 07, 2006 at 12:31:57PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > "Kayvan A. Sylvan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | > My x86 box: > | > gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) > | > > | > My x86_64 box: > | > gcc (GCC) 4.0.2 20051125 (Red Hat 4.0.2-8) > | > > | > but something must be differnt... but what...? > | > | Does anyone have any idea why I keep getting those linking errors? > | > | My Redhat FC4 x86_64 box is updated and running the same tools as Lars's. > | > | I have not been able to do a successful build on my machines for weeks now. > > You don't have a mixture of i386 and x86_64 packages? No. I'm running an x86_64 only configuration. ---Kayvan -- Kayvan A. Sylvan | Proud husband of | Father to my kids: Sylvan Associates, Inc. | Laura Isabella Sylvan, | Katherine Yelena (8/8/89) http://sylvan.com/~kayvan | my beautiful Queen.| Robin Gregory (2/28/92)
