Re: Problem compiling cvs
cghan == cghan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: cghan What is the version of your autoconf? If it is 2.5..., then cghan you have to downgrade to 2.13 or similar. I think I fixed the problems with autoconf 2.5x. At least I can compile with it now. JMarc
Re: Problem compiling cvs
> "cghan" == cghan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: cghan> What is the version of your "autoconf"? If it is 2.5..., then cghan> you have to downgrade to 2.13 or similar. I think I fixed the problems with autoconf 2.5x. At least I can compile with it now. JMarc
Re: Problem compiling cvs
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Pascal Francq wrote: Hi, When I compile current CVS version, I hvae the following error: Making all in mathed make[3]: Entering directory `/home/pfrancq/tmp/lyx-devel/src/mathed' /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c formulabase.C g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -Wp,-MD,.deps/formulabase.pp -c formulabase.C formulabase.C:804:2: warning: #warning pretty ugly In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:390, from /usr/include/g++-3/stl_alloc.h:54, from /usr/include/g++-3/alloc.h:21, from /usr/include/g++-3/std/bastring.h:39, from /usr/include/g++-3/string:6, from ../../src/LString.h:20, from ../../src/Lsstream.h:17, from formulabase.C:18: /usr/include/sys/types.h:87: declaration does not declare anything make[3]: *** [formulabase.lo] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/pfrancq/tmp/lyx-devel/src/mathed' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pfrancq/tmp/lyx-devel/src' make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pfrancq/tmp/lyx-devel/src' make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Is there a workaround? -- What is the version of your autoconf? If it is 2.5..., then you have to downgrade to 2.13 or similar. --cghan
Re: Problem compiling cvs
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, Pascal Francq wrote: > Hi, > When I compile current CVS version, I hvae the following error: > > Making all in mathed > make[3]: Entering directory `/home/pfrancq/tmp/lyx-devel/src/mathed' > /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=compile g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ >-I../.. -I../../boost -isystem /usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -c >formulabase.C > g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../src -I./../ -I../.. -I../../boost -isystem >/usr/X11R6/include -g -O -fno-exceptions -W -Wall -Wp,-MD,.deps/formulabase.pp -c >formulabase.C > formulabase.C:804:2: warning: #warning pretty ugly > In file included from /usr/include/stdlib.h:390, > from /usr/include/g++-3/stl_alloc.h:54, > from /usr/include/g++-3/alloc.h:21, > from /usr/include/g++-3/std/bastring.h:39, > from /usr/include/g++-3/string:6, > from ../../src/LString.h:20, > from ../../src/Lsstream.h:17, > from formulabase.C:18: > /usr/include/sys/types.h:87: declaration does not declare anything > make[3]: *** [formulabase.lo] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/pfrancq/tmp/lyx-devel/src/mathed' > make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/pfrancq/tmp/lyx-devel/src' > make[1]: *** [all-recursive-am] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/pfrancq/tmp/lyx-devel/src' > make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > Is there a workaround? > -- > What is the version of your "autoconf"? If it is 2.5..., then you have to downgrade to 2.13 or similar. --cghan
Re: problem compiling cvs
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote: In file included from lyxlex.C:21: lyxlex_pimpl.h:16: parse error before `{' that needs to be : ... public boost::noncopyable I suppose Lars missed some ... john -- "You lose it if you talk about it." - Ernest Hemingway
Re: problem compiling cvs
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote: | | In file included from lyxlex.C:21: | lyxlex_pimpl.h:16: parse error before `{' | | that needs to be : | | ... public boost::noncopyable | | I suppose Lars missed some ... and that is really strange sine I compiled several times. it is possible that gcc 2.96 has some other lookup rules... I don't know. Lgb
Re: problem compiling cvs
On 16 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote: | | In file included from lyxlex.C:21: | lyxlex_pimpl.h:16: parse error before `{' | | that needs to be : | | ... public boost::noncopyable | | I suppose Lars missed some ... and that is really strange sine I compiled several times. it is possible that gcc 2.96 has some other lookup rules... I don't know. Lgb Interesting ... maybe one of the corners of the C++ standard means it looks back to a class containing an instance and uses the namespace there ... Lars, why don't you ask on comp.lang.c++.moderated ? I'd be interested in the answer thanks john -- "You lose it if you talk about it." - Ernest Hemingway
Re: problem compiling cvs
John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | On 16 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjnnes wrote: | | John Levon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | | On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote: | | | | In file included from lyxlex.C:21: | | lyxlex_pimpl.h:16: parse error before `{' | | | | that needs to be : | | | | ... public boost::noncopyable | | | | I suppose Lars missed some ... | | and that is really strange sine I compiled several times. | | it is possible that gcc 2.96 has some other lookup rules... I don't | know. | | Lgb | | Interesting ... maybe one of the corners of the C++ standard means it looks | back to a class containing an instance and uses the namespace there ... | | Lars, why don't you ask on comp.lang.c++.moderated ? I'd be interested in the | answer I have to check with gcc 3.0 also. It might be wrong lookup in gcc 2.96 or some Koenig Lookup... not sure. Lgb
Re: problem compiling cvs
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote: > In file included from lyxlex.C:21: > lyxlex_pimpl.h:16: parse error before `{' that needs to be : ... public boost::noncopyable I suppose Lars missed some ... john -- "You lose it if you talk about it." - Ernest Hemingway
Re: problem compiling cvs
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote: | | > In file included from lyxlex.C:21: | > lyxlex_pimpl.h:16: parse error before `{' | | that needs to be : | | ... public boost::noncopyable | | I suppose Lars missed some ... and that is really strange sine I compiled several times. it is possible that gcc 2.96 has some other lookup rules... I don't know. Lgb
Re: problem compiling cvs
On 16 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote: > | > | > In file included from lyxlex.C:21: > | > lyxlex_pimpl.h:16: parse error before `{' > | > | that needs to be : > | > | ... public boost::noncopyable > | > | I suppose Lars missed some ... > > and that is really strange sine I compiled several times. > > it is possible that gcc 2.96 has some other lookup rules... I don't > know. > > Lgb Interesting ... maybe one of the corners of the C++ standard means it looks back to a class containing an instance and uses the namespace there ... Lars, why don't you ask on comp.lang.c++.moderated ? I'd be interested in the answer thanks john -- "You lose it if you talk about it." - Ernest Hemingway
Re: problem compiling cvs
John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | On 16 Mar 2001, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: | | > John Levon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > | > | On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Edwin Leuven wrote: | > | | > | > In file included from lyxlex.C:21: | > | > lyxlex_pimpl.h:16: parse error before `{' | > | | > | that needs to be : | > | | > | ... public boost::noncopyable | > | | > | I suppose Lars missed some ... | > | > and that is really strange sine I compiled several times. | > | > it is possible that gcc 2.96 has some other lookup rules... I don't | > know. | > | > Lgb | | Interesting ... maybe one of the corners of the C++ standard means it looks | back to a class containing an instance and uses the namespace there ... | | Lars, why don't you ask on comp.lang.c++.moderated ? I'd be interested in the | answer I have to check with gcc 3.0 also. It might be wrong lookup in gcc 2.96 or some Koenig Lookup... not sure. Lgb