Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 15:50:04 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Maybe too much. Checking LaTeXConfig.lyx for aguplus.layout > > previously I had > > Found: yes, no > > now I have > > Found: yes, yes > > The second yes is for agums.sty, but this is wrong, because not > > installed here. > > I think you overshot it. Many styles are not second-level dependencies, > e.g. beamerarticle, beamerposter and the clo styles some classes > provide. > > I propose you revert and we remove second-level dependencies on a > layout-by-layout basis. > > Jürgen OK. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 14:53 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Maybe too much. Checking LaTeXConfig.lyx for aguplus.layout > previously I had > Found: yes, no > now I have > Found: yes, yes > The second yes is for agums.sty, but this is wrong, because not > installed here. I think you overshot it. Many styles are not second-level dependencies, e.g. beamerarticle, beamerposter and the clo styles some classes provide. I propose you revert and we remove second-level dependencies on a layout-by-layout basis. Jürgen > > Kornel > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 14:22:50 CEST schrieb Kornel Benko : > Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 13:21:22 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller > : > > Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in > > > case of MikTeX, > > > otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in > > > 51cea817100d451981763b2c66185cc35a9726f3, > > > or 'answers.sty' in 5002ef33f03fdd5a7e401b6dd36285e2e4dee004. > > > > Yes, they have been added for the sake of MikTeX, and we have decided > > some time ago to remove them (the windows installer should roll its own > > list for MikTeX if required). > > > > These second-level dependencies are never fixed, and thus not really > > predictable and maintainable. > > > > Jürgen > > > > Committed at 92c8a86. Hopefully nobody screams. > Maybe too much. Checking LaTeXConfig.lyx for aguplus.layout previously I had Found: yes, no now I have Found: yes, yes The second yes is for agums.sty, but this is wrong, because not installed here. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, 7. Juli 2018 13:21:22 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in > > case of MikTeX, > > otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in > > 51cea817100d451981763b2c66185cc35a9726f3, > > or 'answers.sty' in 5002ef33f03fdd5a7e401b6dd36285e2e4dee004. > > Yes, they have been added for the sake of MikTeX, and we have decided > some time ago to remove them (the windows installer should roll its own > list for MikTeX if required). > > These second-level dependencies are never fixed, and thus not really > predictable and maintainable. > > Jürgen > Committed at 92c8a86. Hopefully nobody screams. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Samstag, den 07.07.2018, 13:03 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in > case of MikTeX, > otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in > 51cea817100d451981763b2c66185cc35a9726f3, > or 'answers.sty' in 5002ef33f03fdd5a7e401b6dd36285e2e4dee004. Yes, they have been added for the sake of MikTeX, and we have decided some time ago to remove them (the windows installer should roll its own list for MikTeX if required). These second-level dependencies are never fixed, and thus not really predictable and maintainable. Jürgen > > Kornel > signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Freitag, 6. Juli 2018 17:49:32 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 07/06/2018 04:13 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 22:38:08 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > > : > >> On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > >>> Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. > Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle > them when they become invalid :( > >>> Or just handle them subsequently. > >> Should be easy to write a perl script that would list dependencies. > >> > > Sure, but are you sure it is _always_ OK? > > I meant just to help us check what needs fixing. Lots of unnecessary > dependencies got added along the way. > > Riki > Should we care about requirements here? They _may_ be important in case of MikTeX, otherwise I cannot see why Uwe added 'suffix.sty' in 51cea817100d451981763b2c66185cc35a9726f3, or 'answers.sty' in 5002ef33f03fdd5a7e401b6dd36285e2e4dee004. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
On 07/06/2018 04:13 AM, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 22:38:08 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck > : >> On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: >>> Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle them when they become invalid :( >>> Or just handle them subsequently. >> Should be easy to write a perl script that would list dependencies. >> > Sure, but are you sure it is _always_ OK? I meant just to help us check what needs fixing. Lots of unnecessary dependencies got added along the way. Riki
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 22:38:08 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > >> OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. > >> Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle > >> them when they become invalid :( > > Or just handle them subsequently. > > Should be easy to write a perl script that would list dependencies. > Sure, but are you sure it is _always_ OK? Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 22:38:08 CEST schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck : > On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > >> OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. > >> Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle > >> them when they become invalid :( > > Or just handle them subsequently. > > Should be easy to write a perl script that would list dependencies. > > > >> Changing dtk.layout now. > > This one is probably candidate for stable. > > Fine with me. > > Riki Done at 87ade10 Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
On 07/05/2018 11:59 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: >> OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. >> Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle >> them when they become invalid :( > Or just handle them subsequently. Should be easy to write a perl script that would list dependencies. >> Changing dtk.layout now. > This one is probably candidate for stable. Fine with me. Riki
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 17:55 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. > Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle > them when they become invalid :( Or just handle them subsequently. > Changing dtk.layout now. This one is probably candidate for stable. Jürgen > > Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 17:38:12 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller : > Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 16:36 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > > Sounds reasonable. Will you do it? > > I don't mind if you beat me to it. > > > Also other some layouts? > > I think all layouts will need to be audited. I've already handled some, > but many are left. > > Jürgen > > > OK, there are 65 (out of 121) files waiting for audit. Since there are that many, maybe it would be more handy to handle them when they become invalid :( Changing dtk.layout now. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Donnerstag, den 05.07.2018, 16:36 +0200 schrieb Kornel Benko: > Sounds reasonable. Will you do it? I don't mind if you beat me to it. > Also other some layouts? I think all layouts will need to be audited. I've already handled some, but many are left. Jürgen > > Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
Am Donnerstag, 5. Juli 2018 14:14:09 CEST schrieb Jürgen Spitzmüller
:
> 2018-07-05 11:48 GMT+02:00 Kornel Benko :
>
> > The layout uses dtklogos.sty, but this is not provided by
> > www.ctan.org/usergrps/dante/dtk.zip.
> > Instead there is dtk-logos.sty.
> >
> > Shouldn't the line
> > #
> > \DeclareLaTeXClass[dtk,dtklogos.sty,filecontents.sty,multicol.sty,ragged2e.sty]{Die
> > TeXnische Komoedie}
> > be corrected?
> >
>
> I think we should remove the second-level dependencies. I.e.,
>
> # \DeclareLaTeXClass[dtk]{Die TeXnische Komoedie}
>
> Jürgen
>
>
> >
Sounds reasonable. Will you do it? Also other some layouts?
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
2018-07-05 11:48 GMT+02:00 Kornel Benko :
> The layout uses dtklogos.sty, but this is not provided by
> www.ctan.org/usergrps/dante/dtk.zip.
> Instead there is dtk-logos.sty.
>
> Shouldn't the line
> #
> \DeclareLaTeXClass[dtk,dtklogos.sty,filecontents.sty,multicol.sty,ragged2e.sty]{Die
> TeXnische Komoedie}
> be corrected?
>
I think we should remove the second-level dependencies. I.e.,
# \DeclareLaTeXClass[dtk]{Die TeXnische Komoedie}
Jürgen
>
> Kornel
>
Wrong entry in dtk.layout?
The layout uses dtklogos.sty, but this is not provided by
www.ctan.org/usergrps/dante/dtk.zip.
Instead there is dtk-logos.sty.
Shouldn't the line
#
\DeclareLaTeXClass[dtk,dtklogos.sty,filecontents.sty,multicol.sty,ragged2e.sty]{Die
TeXnische Komoedie}
be corrected?
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
