Re: blanket-permission.txt status update
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 08:02:14PM +0200, Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > > > Well, I've managed to ensnare two of 'em in the last twenty-four hours. > > Not bad, huh? > > > > The problem with Mate and Miyata is that their emails are valid and, > > indeed, active. (I've become a bit of an internet snooper this last month > > or so ;-) Unfortunately, they're just not replying to me. > > > > Perhaps they might take more notice of you? (Or any of the old timers?) > > And I always thought that *you* were an old timer. I suppose it's all > relative ;-) Indeed. 'Active' old-timers from my perspective are Asger, Lars and Jean-Marc. Then there's Juergen (V.) announcing a new potential LyX user from time to time and a couple of names (Alejandro, Matthias...) lost in darkness... Andre'
RE: Re: blanket-permission.txt status update
Asger wrote: >> The problem with Mate and Miyata is that their emails are valid and, >> indeed, active. (I've become a bit of an internet snooper this last >> month or so ;-) Unfortunately, they're just not replying to me. > > Now that you have made the web-page, I assume you can point them to that, > and that will make it clear that this is for real. The more emails I send, the more likely they are to just flag my mails as spam. I think I'll put a mail together and get Lars to post it. The added weight of the project leader and all that. -- Angus
RE: Re: blanket-permission.txt status update
> The problem with Mate and Miyata is that their emails are valid and, > indeed, active. (I've become a bit of an internet snooper this last month > or so ;-) Unfortunately, they're just not replying to me. Now that you have made the web-page, I assume you can point them to that, and that will make it clear that this is for real. Regards, Asger
Re: blanket-permission.txt status update
Alfredo Braunstein wrote: > And I always thought that *you* were an old timer. I suppose it's all > relative ;-) Don't be cheeky, you young whippersnapper. Angus (:-)
Re: blanket-permission.txt status update
Angus Leeming wrote: > Well, I've managed to ensnare two of 'em in the last twenty-four hours. > Not bad, huh? > > The problem with Mate and Miyata is that their emails are valid and, > indeed, active. (I've become a bit of an internet snooper this last month > or so ;-) Unfortunately, they're just not replying to me. > > Perhaps they might take more notice of you? (Or any of the old timers?) And I always thought that *you* were an old timer. I suppose it's all relative ;-) Afredo
Re: blanket-permission.txt status update
Asger Alstrup wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: >> None of 'em look like "major" contributers of code to me, but my >> connections to LyX go back only to the start of the millenium. > > Four of the names I recognise and my old brain kind of associates them > with significant contributions... You might want to focus the search for > those 4 in particular: > >> Robert van der Kamp >> >> Miyata Shigeru >> >> Mate Wierdl >> >> Bernhard Iselborn >> Well, I've managed to ensnare two of 'em in the last twenty-four hours. Not bad, huh? The problem with Mate and Miyata is that their emails are valid and, indeed, active. (I've become a bit of an internet snooper this last month or so ;-) Unfortunately, they're just not replying to me. Perhaps they might take more notice of you? (Or any of the old timers?) Really, I'm at a bit of a loss. -- Angus
Re: blanket-permission.txt status update
Asger Alstrup wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: >> None of 'em look like "major" contributers of code to me, but my >> connections to LyX go back only to the start of the millenium. > > Four of the names I recognise and my old brain kind of associates them > with significant contributions... You might want to focus the search for > those 4 in particular: > >> Robert van der Kamp >> >> Miyata Shigeru >> >> Mate Wierdl >> >> Bernhard Iselborn >> Well, I've managed to ensnare two of 'em in the last twenty-four hours. Not bad, huh? The problem with Mate and Miyata is that their emails are valid and, indeed, active. (I've become a bit of an internet snooper this last month or so ;-) Unfortunately, they're just not replying to me. Perhaps they might take more notice of you? (Or any of the old timers?) Really, I'm at a bit of a loss. -- Angus
Re: blanket-permission.txt status update
Angus Leeming wrote: None of 'em look like "major" contributers of code to me, but my connections to LyX go back only to the start of the millenium. Four of the names I recognise and my old brain kind of associates them with significant contributions... You might want to focus the search for those 4 in particular: Robert van der Kamp Miyata Shigeru Mate Wierdl Bernhard Iselborn Regards, Asger
blanket-permission.txt status update
79 people are now in blanket-permission.txt. That means we're down to the following 26 individuals in the CREDITS file who don't have an entry in blanket-permission.txt None of 'em look like "major" contributers of code to me, but my connections to LyX go back only to the start of the millenium. Angus Apparently valid email address, but no reply Christian Buescher Claus Hentschel Robert van der Kamp Martin Konold Victor Lavrenko Tino Meinen Dirk Niggemann Joacim Persson Zvezdan Petkovic Geoffroy Piroux Bernd Rellermeyer <100.41728 () germanynet ! de> Ivan Schreter Miyata Shigeru David Suárez de Lis Edmar Wienskoski Jr. Mate Wierdl Serge Winitzki No known, valid email address (shows addresses I've tried) = Graham Biswell Francesc Burrull i Mestres Claudio Coco John Michael Floyd Bernhard Iselborn Peter Kremer -- probably some other guy ;-) Thomas Pundt Hubert Schreier Xiaokun Zhu
blanket-permission.txt:
Greetings Angus and all, You most certainly have my permission to add my name and meager contributions to the blanket permissions. Thanks for all your help! Garst
