Re: Two Questions About The Bibliography Section

1999-03-02 Thread Bill Simpson

I agree with J-P, use BibTeX with natbib.
\usepackage{natbib}
\bibliographystyle{apa}

I modified the existing apa.bst and it is pretty good now. Not worth
worrying any more. Wrote paper using this set-up and sent to APA journal.

Bill

-- 
+++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the **Subject** unsubscribe.



Re: Two Questions About The Bibliography Section

1999-03-02 Thread Myles Bogner

Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:

 The \ works here, I don't understand your error unless there is
 a problem with the bibliographic section in a  separate lyx file.

You're right, this does work.  Thanks.  I'm not sure what I was doing
wrong when it wasn't.  In future versions of LyX, would it be possible
to automatically translate ampersands in the Bibliography Label field to
be \ in LaTeX as it's done in LyX documents; or is there a design
reason that this was not done?

Myles

Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
 
  Date: Tue, 02 Mar 1999 00:42:03 +
  From: Myles Bogner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Two Questions About The Bibliography Section
 
  Hello LyX Users,
 
   I am using LyX 1.0.  My LaTeX preamble includes \usepackage{apalike}.
 
   As I cite references within my document, I'd like them to appear as
  (Doe  Smith, 1999).  If I type that in directly after the sentence, it
  works as it should.  However, I'd like to use the keys and labels
  feature of LyX.
 
   So, in the reference section of an article class, in the gray
  Bibliography Item box, I add DoeSmith:1999 as the key and Doe  Smith,
  1999 as the label.  I then go back to my document and insert the
  citation at the end of the appropriate sentence.  When viewing the .dvi
  file, the ampersand is not present.
 
   From my experience with LaTeX, I am aware that the ampersand is a
  special symbol.  So I then inserted into the Bibliography Item's label
  field Doe \ Smith, 1999 but this did not work either.
 
   So my first question is, how can I use the label field in my document
  and get the desired citation look?
 
 The \ works here, I don't understand your error unless there is
 a problem with the bibliographic section in a  separate lyx file.
 
 
   The second question stems from the assumption that I cannot do what I
  want with the first question.  When entering references, the first one
  of course has a key of 1, the second one a key of 2, etc.  I am happy
  simply using these keys without entering any labels (for example, this
  will let me always see how many references I have).  However, LaTeX
  produces errors when labels are not entered. Is there a way to make
  LaTeX not produce errors if for each key, no label is entered?
 
 I'm afraid that you *need* the label, because there are two separate
 pieces of information: one is the key, the other is what reflects
 the citation in the document. The only style in which you
 don't need the label are simple styles like plain (the default).
 
 If you want to give only a key, you should use bibtex and leave
 the formatting of the citation to the program: apalike.sty is supposed
 to be used with .bst, which automatically elaborates the citation text fron
 the citation source. In that case you
 will need to hack the apalike bst style to get the ampersand (the normal
 apalike style uses "and" to link abbreviated author names), or shift to
 a more flexible style (natbib for example). The citation panel will however
 not give the full flexibility and you will probaly need to \cite in
 TeX mode.
 
 If you go to bibTeX, (a good idea IMHO), you *will* need unique keys
 to be able to reuse the bibliographic database, and to pick up
 bibliographic information fron various sources.
 
 Regards
 
 --
 Jean-Pierre
 
 --
 +++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
 To unsubscribe from this list send mail to
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 with the **Subject** unsubscribe.

-- 
+++ the lyx project user mailing list +++
To unsubscribe from this list send mail to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the **Subject** unsubscribe.