Re: MSWord(html) or OpenOffice.Org

2006-09-23 Thread TechTonics

Bob Lounsbury wrote:


On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:14 PM, TechTonics wrote:


Bob Lounsbury wrote:

Hi,
What do you have to do to export in these formats. Neither work for 
me on 1.4.3 with XP.

Thanks,
Bob Lounsbury


I don't think they work. Export the file as .tex from LyX.
Then from the command line htlatex foo.tex = foo.html
which can be directly imported into Word, = foo.doc
htlatex is part of the TeX4ht package:


When I do: htlatex foo.tex=foo.html it returns: Please type another 
input file name so I type foo.tex and everything seems to work except 
that I get a bunch of different foo files like foo.log, foo.aux, 
foo.idv, but no foo.html file anywhere. The TeX4ht package was already 
installed by MikTeX.


What I'm really trying to do is get a good output from LyX into Word 
(Since my advisors want a Word document to read for my thesis) with 
pictures and most formatting complete. Any suggestions would be greatly 
appreciated. Thanks.




Did you follow the installation instructions at the website
I provided? Do you have ImageMagick installed? Do you have
your programs in Windows Path. htlatex yourfilename.tex
will output yourfilename.html which Word imports as
yourfilename.doc You will need to install htlatex properly.

-


http://facweb.arch.ohio-state.edu/pviton/support/tex4ht.html


2.1  Installation

3. You must install ImageMagick (IM) yourself. (Instructions below in 
section 6). You must also ensure that IM places itself in your PATH 
statement before the system32 folder of your Windows installation 
(because system32 contains another program called convert.exe).




As you might imagine, porting LyX (Latex) to Word has been discussed
on the LyX mailing list, often in conjunction to htlatex. The archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/
is one resource to find answers. Place the keyword, such as htlatex,
in the Find window and do a search. Below is one such result:



Re: miktex 2.5 WinLyX

Uwe Stöhr
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:06:30 -0700

TechTonics wrote:


I have the complete download and completely installed Miktex2.5.

tex4ht.cab\texmf\miktex\bin

This path sounds like the package is installed for MiKTeX 2.4 and not 
for 2.5.


However, use MiKTeX's package manager to assure that you've installed 
the correct package tex4ht AND miktex-tex4ht. If they are installed, 
update MiKTeX because just yesterday came out a bugfix release including 
a new text4ht version.


Then you should have the file htlatex.bat in ~\miktex\bin


Do you mean that htlatex works for you from either LyX or the 
command line?


I tested it from within LyX and found the bug that tex4ht doesn't 
support paths with spaces - I hate this kind of bugs more and more!.


LyX's temp directory path contains spaces.

But anyway, could you please file a bug report at MiKTeX sourceforge 
project page.


thanks and regards Uwe



The Miktex update manager can download and install this
if you don't have it. www.miktex.org



Good night and good luck,
Stephen




1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Hans Prueller
hi there,
 
I just downloaded and installed the new 1.4.3 windows binaries but
when I try to start lyx, nothing happens. obviously windows can't execute
the file...
 
 
whats the problem? had anybody else similar experiences?
 
hans


Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Bhaskaran, Sreekumar
It doesn't work for me either.

This is what happens. Once I install Lyx, when I click on run Lyx,
nothing happens. I even restarted the machine and then went to program
files and clicked on lyx.bat and the result was same.

When I clicked on lyx.exe, it says that the application configuration
file is wrong. 



Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Mukhtar Ullah

Same problem here. I was afraid to ask thinking I must be doing somethin wrong.



Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Carlos
Hans Prueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I just downloaded and installed the new 1.4.3 windows binaries but
 when I try to start lyx, nothing happens. obviously windows can't execute
 the file...

 had anybody else similar experiences?
 
 hans
 


I have the same problem as you with the new 1.4.3 windows version.

I have installed it uninstalling and without uninstalling the previous version
and it hasn´t worked. 

carlos




1.4.3 preview error

2006-09-23 Thread Marcelo Acuña
Hello,
 I have Linux Suse 9.3, lyx 1.4.3 compiled.

 View  DVI no work
 appears DVI visor, xdvik, with file name but nothing
more, white page.

 PDF´s updates no work.

 Regards.

 Marcelo






__
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
¡Probalo ya! 
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas



Re: Problem with Algorithm label language

2006-09-23 Thread Ares

The hyperref README says:

6 PACKAGE COMPATIBILITY
===

Currently only package loading orders are available:

[...]

algorithm
-
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage{hyperref}
  \usepackage[chapter]{algorithm
}

So float (which is modified by hyperref) and hyperref have to be loaded before
algorithm. The problem is that LyX loads algorithm before the user preamble.
So your only chance is probably to load the algorithm package yourself (and
use ERT in the document.


1) If I load algorithm (again) after hyperref, LyX (or LaTeX) ignores
it and always gives me the undefined control sequence error message.
in fact, LyX loads algorithm with the command \newfloat, before the
user preamble, I guess (I exported to plain LaTeX)

2) you can use a package declaration in the preamble only, not after
the \begin{document} command.

so I don't see an escape. like a dog eating his tail (?).

Is there a way not to load a (default) package in LyX? in this case I
could load it manually in the preamble. Is there a way to unload a
package in LaTeX  in the preamle?

I also tried to export to LaTeX and cut the algorithm declarationand
and paste it in the preamble after the hyperref declaration, but I
messed things up.

otherwise I have to choose between bookmarks (which look pretty good
btw) and algorithms I think I'll choose the latter for the moment, and
look for a solution later. but let me know if you have any idea, and
thank you.

Regards,
Diego


Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Alex
Dear all,

I had similar problem, when I compiled it from source
(linux, SuSe x64 10.0, GCC 4.0.2 20050901).

I had to rename the configuration directory for successful lyx start.
The configuration directory contained valid config for the 1.4.3svn!

Alex

Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
 Same problem here. I was afraid to ask thinking I must be doing somethin 
 wrong.
 
 
 



Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Guido Milanese
Mukhtar Ullah wrote on 
Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:35:53 -0700

Same problem here. I was afraid to ask thinking I must be doing somethin 
wrong.

Me too. the Dos window flashes for a moment and disappewars immetiately. If 
I were on Unix-like systems (as I normally am) I would say it's a matter of 
permissions, because trying to call the program from a dos window I get an 
error messages sayng that it is not possible to start this program.

Sorry, because I was showing the program to a Windows-W***d-IE addict who was 
very inpressed by LyX on my Linux system...

Thanks a lot,
g

-- 
Guido Milanese
Vocal Ensemble Ars Antiqua, Genova (Genoa), Italy
http://www.arsantiqua.org


Re: Replacing Natbib with Custom BibStyle (WAS: changing bibliography style in layouts)

2006-09-23 Thread Luis Rivera
Luis Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 [snip] I found that I can use makebst generated bibtex styles with LyX's
 (presumably) hardcoded \usepackage[...]{natbib} command, provided they use the
 standard natbib macros: that's so because the \bibliographystyle declaration
 may be adjusted in the document's preamble.
 

Indeed, oxon is somewhat of a weird bird: it has harvard as background, yet it
uses only the plain \cite command; so I found I can get my job done using the
standard citations provided by LyX.

Thanks to the makebst and LyX developers.

Luis.




Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.4.3 is relelased

2006-09-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Paul Schwartz wrote:

In fact there is so many aside programs with LyX that I am always afraid 
to miss one and for that reason, till today, each time I have fully update 
(reinstalling everything).
But, if I follow you properly, when you have got one installation, let us 
say 1.4.1, you just need to install 1.4.3 and keep former Miktex, 
ImageMagick, Ghostscript, Aspell ( I am not sure ) and GSView or to update 
them directly.

As such I should have just to download LyX 1.4.3. Am I correct ?



Yes, that is correct.  Once you have all the ancillary programs 
installed (although calling MikTeX ancillary is a bit of the tail 
wagging the dog), you need only upgrade LyX itself (using the more 
compact of the installers).  Similarly, ImageMagick, Ghostscript/GSView 
and MikTeX can be upgraded independently.  (I would be a bit hesitant to 
upgrade Aspell, as the connections from LyX to Aspell are hard-wired.) 
In point of fact, I don't know that I've ever upgraded ImageMagick, I 
upgrade Ghostscript at best sporadically, but I do try to keep MikTeX up 
to date, and that seems to work well for me.


/Paul



Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.4.3 is relelased

2006-09-23 Thread Paul Schwartz
Thanks Paul, you have been very patient with me; sorry for MikTeX, it was 
not really my feeling to call it an ancillary. I appreciate your tolerance 
for those beotians who are just using without knowing the details  ... and 
being quite happy with that.

Thanks again

Paul


Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit dans le message 
de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Paul Schwartz wrote:

 In fact there is so many aside programs with LyX that I am always 
 afraid to miss one and for that reason, till today, each time I have 
 fully update (reinstalling everything).
 But, if I follow you properly, when you have got one installation, let us 
 say 1.4.1, you just need to install 1.4.3 and keep former Miktex, 
 ImageMagick, Ghostscript, Aspell ( I am not sure ) and GSView or to 
 update them directly.
 As such I should have just to download LyX 1.4.3. Am I correct ?


 Yes, that is correct.  Once you have all the ancillary programs installed 
 (although calling MikTeX ancillary is a bit of the tail wagging the 
 dog), you need only upgrade LyX itself (using the more compact of the 
 installers).  Similarly, ImageMagick, Ghostscript/GSView and MikTeX can be 
 upgraded independently.  (I would be a bit hesitant to upgrade Aspell, as 
 the connections from LyX to Aspell are hard-wired.) In point of fact, I 
 don't know that I've ever upgraded ImageMagick, I upgrade Ghostscript at 
 best sporadically, but I do try to keep MikTeX up to date, and that seems 
 to work well for me.

 /Paul

 





Re: MSWord(html) or OpenOffice.Org

2006-09-23 Thread TechTonics

Bob Lounsbury wrote:


On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:14 PM, TechTonics wrote:


Bob Lounsbury wrote:

Hi,
What do you have to do to export in these formats. Neither work for 
me on 1.4.3 with XP.

Thanks,
Bob Lounsbury


I don't think they work. Export the file as .tex from LyX.
Then from the command line htlatex foo.tex = foo.html
which can be directly imported into Word, = foo.doc
htlatex is part of the TeX4ht package:


When I do: htlatex foo.tex=foo.html it returns: Please type another 
input file name so I type foo.tex and everything seems to work except 
that I get a bunch of different foo files like foo.log, foo.aux, 
foo.idv, but no foo.html file anywhere. The TeX4ht package was already 
installed by MikTeX.


What I'm really trying to do is get a good output from LyX into Word 
(Since my advisors want a Word document to read for my thesis) with 
pictures and most formatting complete. Any suggestions would be greatly 
appreciated. Thanks.




Did you follow the installation instructions at the website
I provided? Do you have ImageMagick installed? Do you have
your programs in Windows Path. htlatex yourfilename.tex
will output yourfilename.html which Word imports as
yourfilename.doc You will need to install htlatex properly.

-


http://facweb.arch.ohio-state.edu/pviton/support/tex4ht.html


2.1  Installation

3. You must install ImageMagick (IM) yourself. (Instructions below in 
section 6). You must also ensure that IM places itself in your PATH 
statement before the system32 folder of your Windows installation 
(because system32 contains another program called convert.exe).




As you might imagine, porting LyX (Latex) to Word has been discussed
on the LyX mailing list, often in conjunction to htlatex. The archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/
is one resource to find answers. Place the keyword, such as htlatex,
in the Find window and do a search. Below is one such result:



Re: miktex 2.5 WinLyX

Uwe Stöhr
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:06:30 -0700

TechTonics wrote:


I have the complete download and completely installed Miktex2.5.

tex4ht.cab\texmf\miktex\bin

This path sounds like the package is installed for MiKTeX 2.4 and not 
for 2.5.


However, use MiKTeX's package manager to assure that you've installed 
the correct package tex4ht AND miktex-tex4ht. If they are installed, 
update MiKTeX because just yesterday came out a bugfix release including 
a new text4ht version.


Then you should have the file htlatex.bat in ~\miktex\bin


Do you mean that htlatex works for you from either LyX or the 
command line?


I tested it from within LyX and found the bug that tex4ht doesn't 
support paths with spaces - I hate this kind of bugs more and more!.


LyX's temp directory path contains spaces.

But anyway, could you please file a bug report at MiKTeX sourceforge 
project page.


thanks and regards Uwe



The Miktex update manager can download and install this
if you don't have it. www.miktex.org



Good night and good luck,
Stephen




1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Hans Prueller
hi there,
 
I just downloaded and installed the new 1.4.3 windows binaries but
when I try to start lyx, nothing happens. obviously windows can't execute
the file...
 
 
whats the problem? had anybody else similar experiences?
 
hans


Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Bhaskaran, Sreekumar
It doesn't work for me either.

This is what happens. Once I install Lyx, when I click on run Lyx,
nothing happens. I even restarted the machine and then went to program
files and clicked on lyx.bat and the result was same.

When I clicked on lyx.exe, it says that the application configuration
file is wrong. 



Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Mukhtar Ullah

Same problem here. I was afraid to ask thinking I must be doing somethin wrong.



Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Carlos
Hans Prueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I just downloaded and installed the new 1.4.3 windows binaries but
 when I try to start lyx, nothing happens. obviously windows can't execute
 the file...

 had anybody else similar experiences?
 
 hans
 


I have the same problem as you with the new 1.4.3 windows version.

I have installed it uninstalling and without uninstalling the previous version
and it hasn´t worked. 

carlos




1.4.3 preview error

2006-09-23 Thread Marcelo Acuña
Hello,
 I have Linux Suse 9.3, lyx 1.4.3 compiled.

 View  DVI no work
 appears DVI visor, xdvik, with file name but nothing
more, white page.

 PDF´s updates no work.

 Regards.

 Marcelo






__
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
¡Probalo ya! 
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas



LyX 1.4.3, pdflatex and EPS in OS X

2006-09-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,

I just tried the last version of LyX compiled for OS X and detected some
problems:

- pdflatex is not working (it was working with the last version).
- I cannot not see eps figures in LyX, event though they appear after DVI
in the generated pdf. This is something I also 
detected in 1.4.2 but that worked right for me in 1.4.0 preview (I haven't
changed my latex install).

Cheers,

Jordi




mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .




Re: LyX 1.4.3, pdflatex and EPS in OS X

2006-09-23 Thread Jens Noeckel


On Sep 23, 2006, at 9:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi,

I just tried the last version of LyX compiled for OS X and detected  
some

problems:

- pdflatex is not working (it was working with the last version).
- I cannot not see eps figures in LyX, event though they appear  
after DVI

in the generated pdf. This is something I also
detected in 1.4.2 but that worked right for me in 1.4.0 preview (I  
haven't

changed my latex install).

Cheers,

Jordi


Hi,
this sounds like a problem with the path setup. I don't have this  
problem on LyX 1.4.2 or 1.4.3, but here is what I would do (not  
knowing what TeX installation you have):
Open LyX Preferences and go to Paths. Check that the colon- 
separated list of paths in that field contains the path to your latex/ 
graphics tools. In particular, I would check the location of the  
required binaries by going to the Terminal and typing which latex,  
which gv and which convert
Those paths should appear in LyX' Paths list, preferably as the first  
entries. If they appear in the list but are preceded by other path  
entries, then you might want to rearrange the order of those paths.  
It is conceivable that you have two versions of some utility like  
convert or gv in different directories, and only one of them  
works properly. Changing the order of paths could fix that.


Jens



Re: Problem with Algorithm label language

2006-09-23 Thread Ares

The hyperref README says:

6 PACKAGE COMPATIBILITY
===

Currently only package loading orders are available:

[...]

algorithm
-
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage{hyperref}
  \usepackage[chapter]{algorithm
}

So float (which is modified by hyperref) and hyperref have to be loaded before
algorithm. The problem is that LyX loads algorithm before the user preamble.
So your only chance is probably to load the algorithm package yourself (and
use ERT in the document.


1) If I load algorithm (again) after hyperref, LyX (or LaTeX) ignores
it and always gives me the undefined control sequence error message.
in fact, LyX loads algorithm with the command \newfloat, before the
user preamble, I guess (I exported to plain LaTeX)

2) you can use a package declaration in the preamble only, not after
the \begin{document} command.

so I don't see an escape. like a dog eating his tail (?).

Is there a way not to load a (default) package in LyX? in this case I
could load it manually in the preamble. Is there a way to unload a
package in LaTeX  in the preamle?

I also tried to export to LaTeX and cut the algorithm declarationand
and paste it in the preamble after the hyperref declaration, but I
messed things up.

otherwise I have to choose between bookmarks (which look pretty good
btw) and algorithms I think I'll choose the latter for the moment, and
look for a solution later. but let me know if you have any idea, and
thank you.

Regards,
Diego


Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Alex
Dear all,

I had similar problem, when I compiled it from source
(linux, SuSe x64 10.0, GCC 4.0.2 20050901).

I had to rename the configuration directory for successful lyx start.
The configuration directory contained valid config for the 1.4.3svn!

Alex

Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
 Same problem here. I was afraid to ask thinking I must be doing somethin 
 wrong.
 
 
 



Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Guido Milanese
Mukhtar Ullah wrote on 
Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:35:53 -0700

Same problem here. I was afraid to ask thinking I must be doing somethin 
wrong.

Me too. the Dos window flashes for a moment and disappewars immetiately. If 
I were on Unix-like systems (as I normally am) I would say it's a matter of 
permissions, because trying to call the program from a dos window I get an 
error messages sayng that it is not possible to start this program.

Sorry, because I was showing the program to a Windows-W***d-IE addict who was 
very inpressed by LyX on my Linux system...

Thanks a lot,
g

-- 
Guido Milanese
Vocal Ensemble Ars Antiqua, Genova (Genoa), Italy
http://www.arsantiqua.org


Re: Replacing Natbib with Custom BibStyle (WAS: changing bibliography style in layouts)

2006-09-23 Thread Luis Rivera
Luis Rivera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 
 [snip] I found that I can use makebst generated bibtex styles with LyX's
 (presumably) hardcoded \usepackage[...]{natbib} command, provided they use the
 standard natbib macros: that's so because the \bibliographystyle declaration
 may be adjusted in the document's preamble.
 

Indeed, oxon is somewhat of a weird bird: it has harvard as background, yet it
uses only the plain \cite command; so I found I can get my job done using the
standard citations provided by LyX.

Thanks to the makebst and LyX developers.

Luis.




Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.4.3 is relelased

2006-09-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Paul Schwartz wrote:

In fact there is so many aside programs with LyX that I am always afraid 
to miss one and for that reason, till today, each time I have fully update 
(reinstalling everything).
But, if I follow you properly, when you have got one installation, let us 
say 1.4.1, you just need to install 1.4.3 and keep former Miktex, 
ImageMagick, Ghostscript, Aspell ( I am not sure ) and GSView or to update 
them directly.

As such I should have just to download LyX 1.4.3. Am I correct ?



Yes, that is correct.  Once you have all the ancillary programs 
installed (although calling MikTeX ancillary is a bit of the tail 
wagging the dog), you need only upgrade LyX itself (using the more 
compact of the installers).  Similarly, ImageMagick, Ghostscript/GSView 
and MikTeX can be upgraded independently.  (I would be a bit hesitant to 
upgrade Aspell, as the connections from LyX to Aspell are hard-wired.) 
In point of fact, I don't know that I've ever upgraded ImageMagick, I 
upgrade Ghostscript at best sporadically, but I do try to keep MikTeX up 
to date, and that seems to work well for me.


/Paul



Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.4.3 is relelased

2006-09-23 Thread Paul Schwartz
Thanks Paul, you have been very patient with me; sorry for MikTeX, it was 
not really my feeling to call it an ancillary. I appreciate your tolerance 
for those beotians who are just using without knowing the details  ... and 
being quite happy with that.

Thanks again

Paul


Paul A. Rubin [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit dans le message 
de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Paul Schwartz wrote:

 In fact there is so many aside programs with LyX that I am always 
 afraid to miss one and for that reason, till today, each time I have 
 fully update (reinstalling everything).
 But, if I follow you properly, when you have got one installation, let us 
 say 1.4.1, you just need to install 1.4.3 and keep former Miktex, 
 ImageMagick, Ghostscript, Aspell ( I am not sure ) and GSView or to 
 update them directly.
 As such I should have just to download LyX 1.4.3. Am I correct ?


 Yes, that is correct.  Once you have all the ancillary programs installed 
 (although calling MikTeX ancillary is a bit of the tail wagging the 
 dog), you need only upgrade LyX itself (using the more compact of the 
 installers).  Similarly, ImageMagick, Ghostscript/GSView and MikTeX can be 
 upgraded independently.  (I would be a bit hesitant to upgrade Aspell, as 
 the connections from LyX to Aspell are hard-wired.) In point of fact, I 
 don't know that I've ever upgraded ImageMagick, I upgrade Ghostscript at 
 best sporadically, but I do try to keep MikTeX up to date, and that seems 
 to work well for me.

 /Paul

 





Re: MSWord(html) or OpenOffice.Org

2006-09-23 Thread TechTonics

Bob Lounsbury wrote:


On Sep 22, 2006, at 1:14 PM, TechTonics wrote:


Bob Lounsbury wrote:

Hi,
What do you have to do to export in these formats. Neither work for 
me on 1.4.3 with XP.

Thanks,
Bob Lounsbury


I don't think they work. Export the file as .tex from LyX.
Then from the command line "htlatex foo.tex" = foo.html
which can be directly imported into Word, = foo.doc
htlatex is part of the TeX4ht package:


When I do: "htlatex foo.tex=foo.html" it returns: "Please type another 
input file name" so I type "foo.tex" and everything seems to work except 
that I get a bunch of different foo files like "foo.log, foo.aux, 
foo.idv", but no foo.html file anywhere. The TeX4ht package was already 
installed by MikTeX.


What I'm really trying to do is get a good output from LyX into Word 
(Since my advisors want a Word document to read for my thesis) with 
pictures and most formatting complete. Any suggestions would be greatly 
appreciated. Thanks.




Did you follow the installation instructions at the website
I provided? Do you have ImageMagick installed? Do you have
your programs in Windows Path. htlatex yourfilename.tex
will output yourfilename.html which Word imports as
yourfilename.doc You will need to install htlatex properly.

-


http://facweb.arch.ohio-state.edu/pviton/support/tex4ht.html


2.1  Installation

3. You must install ImageMagick (IM) yourself. (Instructions below in 
section 6). You must also ensure that IM places itself in your PATH 
statement before the system32 folder of your Windows installation 
(because system32 contains another program called convert.exe).




As you might imagine, porting LyX (Latex) to Word has been discussed
on the LyX mailing list, often in conjunction to htlatex. The archive
http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/
is one resource to find answers. Place the keyword, such as htlatex,
in the Find window and do a search. Below is one such result:



Re: miktex 2.5 WinLyX

Uwe Stöhr
Thu, 10 Aug 2006 04:06:30 -0700

TechTonics wrote:


I have the complete download and completely installed Miktex2.5.

tex4ht.cab\texmf\miktex\bin

This path sounds like the package is installed for MiKTeX 2.4 and not 
for 2.5.


However, use MiKTeX's package manager to assure that you've installed 
the correct package "tex4ht" AND "miktex-tex4ht". If they are installed, 
update MiKTeX because just yesterday came out a bugfix release including 
a new text4ht version.


Then you should have the file htlatex.bat in ~\miktex\bin


Do you mean that htlatex works for you from either LyX or the 
command line?


I tested it from within LyX and found the bug that tex4ht doesn't 
support paths with spaces - I hate this kind of bugs more and more!.


LyX's temp directory path contains spaces.

But anyway, could you please file a bug report at MiKTeX sourceforge 
project page.


thanks and regards Uwe



The Miktex update manager can download and install this
if you don't have it. www.miktex.org



Good night and good luck,
Stephen




1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Hans Prueller
hi there,
 
I just downloaded and installed the new 1.4.3 windows binaries but
when I try to start lyx, nothing happens. obviously windows can't execute
the file...
 
 
whats the problem? had anybody else similar experiences?
 
hans


Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Bhaskaran, Sreekumar
It doesn't work for me either.

This is what happens. Once I install Lyx, when I click on run Lyx,
nothing happens. I even restarted the machine and then went to program
files and clicked on lyx.bat and the result was same.

When I clicked on lyx.exe, it says that the application configuration
file is wrong. 



Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Mukhtar Ullah

Same problem here. I was afraid to ask thinking I must be doing somethin wrong.



Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Carlos
Hans Prueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I just downloaded and installed the new 1.4.3 windows binaries but
> when I try to start lyx, nothing happens. obviously windows can't execute
> the file...
>
> had anybody else similar experiences?
> 
> hans
> 


I have the same problem as you with the new 1.4.3 windows version.

I have installed it uninstalling and without uninstalling the previous version
and it hasn´t worked. 

carlos




1.4.3 preview error

2006-09-23 Thread Marcelo Acuña
Hello,
 I have Linux Suse 9.3, lyx 1.4.3 compiled.

 View > DVI no work
 appears DVI visor, xdvik, with file name but nothing
more, white page.

 PDF´s updates no work.

 Regards.

 Marcelo






__
Preguntá. Respondé. Descubrí.
Todo lo que querías saber, y lo que ni imaginabas,
está en Yahoo! Respuestas (Beta).
¡Probalo ya! 
http://www.yahoo.com.ar/respuestas



LyX 1.4.3, pdflatex and EPS in OS X

2006-09-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,

I just tried the last version of LyX compiled for OS X and detected some
problems:

- pdflatex is not working (it was working with the last version).
- I cannot not see eps figures in LyX, event though they appear after DVI
in the generated pdf. This is something I also 
detected in 1.4.2 but that worked right for me in 1.4.0 preview (I haven't
changed my latex install).

Cheers,

Jordi




mail2web - Check your email from the web at
http://mail2web.com/ .




Re: LyX 1.4.3, pdflatex and EPS in OS X

2006-09-23 Thread Jens Noeckel


On Sep 23, 2006, at 9:13 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Hi,

I just tried the last version of LyX compiled for OS X and detected  
some

problems:

- pdflatex is not working (it was working with the last version).
- I cannot not see eps figures in LyX, event though they appear  
after DVI

in the generated pdf. This is something I also
detected in 1.4.2 but that worked right for me in 1.4.0 preview (I  
haven't

changed my latex install).

Cheers,

Jordi


Hi,
this sounds like a problem with the path setup. I don't have this  
problem on LyX 1.4.2 or 1.4.3, but here is what I would do (not  
knowing what TeX installation you have):
Open LyX Preferences and go to "Paths". Check that the colon- 
separated list of paths in that field contains the path to your latex/ 
graphics tools. In particular, I would check the location of the  
required binaries by going to the Terminal and typing "which latex",  
"which gv" and "which convert"
Those paths should appear in LyX' Paths list, preferably as the first  
entries. If they appear in the list but are preceded by other path  
entries, then you might want to rearrange the order of those paths.  
It is conceivable that you have two versions of some utility like  
"convert" or "gv" in different directories, and only one of them  
works properly. Changing the order of paths could fix that.


Jens



Re: Problem with Algorithm label language

2006-09-23 Thread Ares

The hyperref README says:

6 PACKAGE COMPATIBILITY
===

Currently only package loading orders are available:

[...]

algorithm
-
  \usepackage{float}
  \usepackage{hyperref}
  \usepackage[chapter]{algorithm
}

So float (which is modified by hyperref) and hyperref have to be loaded before
algorithm. The problem is that LyX loads algorithm before the user preamble.
So your only chance is probably to load the algorithm package yourself (and
use ERT in the document.


1) If I load algorithm (again) after hyperref, LyX (or LaTeX) ignores
it and always gives me the "undefined control sequence" error message.
in fact, LyX loads algorithm with the command \newfloat, before the
user preamble, I guess (I exported to plain LaTeX)

2) you can use a package declaration in the preamble only, not after
the \begin{document} command.

so I don't see an escape. like a dog eating his tail (?).

Is there a way not to load a (default) package in LyX? in this case I
could load it "manually" in the preamble. Is there a way to "unload" a
package in LaTeX  in the preamle?

I also tried to export to LaTeX and cut the algorithm declarationand
and paste it in the preamble after the hyperref declaration, but I
messed things up.

otherwise I have to choose between bookmarks (which look pretty good
btw) and algorithms I think I'll choose the latter for the moment, and
look for a solution later. but let me know if you have any idea, and
thank you.

Regards,
Diego


Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Alex
Dear all,

I had similar problem, when I compiled it from source
(linux, SuSe x64 10.0, GCC 4.0.2 20050901).

I had to rename the configuration directory for successful lyx start.
The configuration directory contained valid config for the 1.4.3svn!

Alex

Mukhtar Ullah wrote:
> Same problem here. I was afraid to ask thinking I must be doing somethin 
> wrong.
> 
> 
> 



Re: 1.4.3 windows binaries don't work?

2006-09-23 Thread Guido Milanese
Mukhtar Ullah wrote on 
Sat, 23 Sep 2006 06:35:53 -0700

>Same problem here. I was afraid to ask thinking I must be doing somethin 
>wrong.

Me too. the "Dos" window flashes for a moment and disappewars immetiately. If 
I were on Unix-like systems (as I normally am) I would say it's a matter of 
permissions, because trying to call the program from a "dos" window I get an 
error messages sayng that it is not possible to start this program.

Sorry, because I was showing the program to a Windows-W***d-IE addict who was 
very inpressed by LyX on my Linux system...

Thanks a lot,
g

-- 
Guido Milanese
Vocal Ensemble Ars Antiqua, Genova (Genoa), Italy
http://www.arsantiqua.org


Re: Replacing Natbib with Custom BibStyle (WAS: changing bibliography style in layouts)

2006-09-23 Thread Luis Rivera
Luis Rivera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> 
> [snip] I found that I can use makebst generated bibtex styles with LyX's
> (presumably) hardcoded \usepackage[...]{natbib} command, provided they use the
> "standard" natbib macros: that's so because the \bibliographystyle declaration
> may be adjusted in the document's preamble.
> 

Indeed, oxon is somewhat of a weird bird: it has harvard as background, yet it
uses only the plain \cite command; so I found I can get my job done using the
standard citations provided by LyX.

Thanks to the makebst and LyX developers.

Luis.




Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.4.3 is relelased

2006-09-23 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Paul Schwartz wrote:

In fact there is so many "aside" programs with LyX that I am always afraid 
to miss one and for that reason, till today, each time I have fully update 
(reinstalling everything).
But, if I follow you properly, when you have got one installation, let us 
say 1.4.1, you just need to install 1.4.3 and keep former Miktex, 
ImageMagick, Ghostscript, Aspell ( I am not sure ) and GSView or to update 
them directly.

As such I should have just to download LyX 1.4.3. Am I correct ?



Yes, that is correct.  Once you have all the ancillary programs 
installed (although calling MikTeX "ancillary" is a bit of the tail 
wagging the dog), you need only upgrade LyX itself (using the more 
compact of the installers).  Similarly, ImageMagick, Ghostscript/GSView 
and MikTeX can be upgraded independently.  (I would be a bit hesitant to 
upgrade Aspell, as the connections from LyX to Aspell are hard-wired.) 
In point of fact, I don't know that I've ever upgraded ImageMagick, I 
upgrade Ghostscript at best sporadically, but I do try to keep MikTeX up 
to date, and that seems to work well for me.


/Paul



Re: [ANNOUNCE] LyX 1.4.3 is relelased

2006-09-23 Thread Paul Schwartz
Thanks Paul, you have been very patient with me; sorry for MikTeX, it was 
not really my feeling to call it an ancillary. I appreciate your tolerance 
for those beotians who are just using without knowing the details  ... and 
being quite happy with that.

Thanks again

Paul


"Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit dans le message 
de news: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Paul Schwartz wrote:
>
>> In fact there is so many "aside" programs with LyX that I am always 
>> afraid to miss one and for that reason, till today, each time I have 
>> fully update (reinstalling everything).
>> But, if I follow you properly, when you have got one installation, let us 
>> say 1.4.1, you just need to install 1.4.3 and keep former Miktex, 
>> ImageMagick, Ghostscript, Aspell ( I am not sure ) and GSView or to 
>> update them directly.
>> As such I should have just to download LyX 1.4.3. Am I correct ?
>>
>
> Yes, that is correct.  Once you have all the ancillary programs installed 
> (although calling MikTeX "ancillary" is a bit of the tail wagging the 
> dog), you need only upgrade LyX itself (using the more compact of the 
> installers).  Similarly, ImageMagick, Ghostscript/GSView and MikTeX can be 
> upgraded independently.  (I would be a bit hesitant to upgrade Aspell, as 
> the connections from LyX to Aspell are hard-wired.) In point of fact, I 
> don't know that I've ever upgraded ImageMagick, I upgrade Ghostscript at 
> best sporadically, but I do try to keep MikTeX up to date, and that seems 
> to work well for me.
>
> /Paul
>
>