Re: Mixing Greek and English

1999-01-15 Thread Prokopis Prokopidis

Robert Goulding wrote:
 
 Another contributor to this list asked about combining a language which
 uses a Roman alphabet (German or English) with another such as Greek or
 Hebrew. The answer (very useful for me--thanks) concerned only Hebrew;
 but I would also like to know how I can include phrases or sentences of
 Greek (classical and fully-accented) in an otherwise English document.
 

If the babel package for multilingual documents is installed with your
LaTeX distibution, it would be fairly easy to produce, using
transliteration, documents including text in (classical and modern)
greek or in any other of the supported languages. Check
ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/language/greek/package-babel/doc/usage.ps
for detailed instructions. Send a personal mail in case you need further
help.

Prokopis



Re: Mixing Greek and English

1999-01-15 Thread Prokopis Prokopidis

Robert Goulding wrote:
 
 Another contributor to this list asked about combining a language which
 uses a Roman alphabet (German or English) with another such as Greek or
 Hebrew. The answer (very useful for me--thanks) concerned only Hebrew;
 but I would also like to know how I can include phrases or sentences of
 Greek (classical and fully-accented) in an otherwise English document.
 

If the babel package for multilingual documents is installed with your
LaTeX distibution, it would be fairly easy to produce, using
transliteration, documents including text in (classical and modern)
greek or in any other of the supported languages. Check
ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/language/greek/package-babel/doc/usage.ps
for detailed instructions. Send a personal mail in case you need further
help.

Prokopis



Re: Mixing Greek and English

1999-01-15 Thread Prokopis Prokopidis

Robert Goulding wrote:
> 
> Another contributor to this list asked about combining a language which
> uses a Roman alphabet (German or English) with another such as Greek or
> Hebrew. The answer (very useful for me--thanks) concerned only Hebrew;
> but I would also like to know how I can include phrases or sentences of
> Greek (classical and fully-accented) in an otherwise English document.
> 

If the babel package for multilingual documents is installed with your
LaTeX distibution, it would be fairly easy to produce, using
transliteration, documents including text in (classical and modern)
greek or in any other of the supported languages. Check
ftp://ftp.tex.ac.uk/tex-archive/language/greek/package-babel/doc/usage.ps
for detailed instructions. Send a personal mail in case you need further
help.

Prokopis



Combination of DocBook, LinuxDoc and LyX -- once more

1999-01-02 Thread Prokopis Prokopidis

Apologies for bringing up this issue again, but I'm a bit confused. On
an intel machine, RedHat 6.1 installed the following teTeX RPMs:

tetex-1.0.6-7
tetex-afm-1.0.6-7
tetex-dvilj-1.0.6-7
tetex-dvips-1.0.6-7
tetex-fonts-1.0.6-7
tetex-latex-1.0.6-7
tetex-xdvi-1.0.6-7

After the installation I added the following sgml related RPMs from the
distribution cd and the RedHat powertools collection
(ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/powertools/6.1/):

sgml-common-0.1-6
sgml-tools-1.0.9-2
docbook-3.0-12
stylesheets-0.11rh-2
jade-1.2.1-6
jadetex-2.5-1

At this point, I was able to produce, LinuxDoc- *and*
DocBook-originating HTML, TeX etc. with commands like the following:

db2dvi  xarticle.sgm # (DocBook)
sgml2latex example.sgml # (LinuxDoc)

Next, I installed the LyX RPMs:

tetex-lyx-1.1.2-1
lyx-1.1.2-1

Now, LyX did find LinuxDoc, but *not* DocBook, as it reported in the
configuration file it generated.

Trying to change that, I attempted to upgrade to sgmltools,v2 with the
RPM

sgmltools-CVS19990807-2

from ftp://ftp.us.sgmltools.org

This was not allowed as conflicts were reported with packages
jade-1.2.1-6 and jadetex-2.5-1. Just for testing, I uninstalled the
jade* packages and installed sgmltools-CVS19990807-2. OK. After
reconfiguring, LyX saw DocBook but, rightfully, lost LinuxDoc.

One question is why LyX cannot understand that, although
sgmltools-CVS19990807-2 is not present, DocBook exists on my system.

Another question is if there is a way to convince LyX on that. What I
want is both DTDs present and working, with or without LyX, for obvious
reasons.

TIA

Prokopis



Combination of DocBook, LinuxDoc and LyX -- once more

1999-01-02 Thread Prokopis Prokopidis

Apologies for bringing up this issue again, but I'm a bit confused. On
an intel machine, RedHat 6.1 installed the following teTeX RPMs:

tetex-1.0.6-7
tetex-afm-1.0.6-7
tetex-dvilj-1.0.6-7
tetex-dvips-1.0.6-7
tetex-fonts-1.0.6-7
tetex-latex-1.0.6-7
tetex-xdvi-1.0.6-7

After the installation I added the following sgml related RPMs from the
distribution cd and the RedHat powertools collection
(ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/powertools/6.1/):

sgml-common-0.1-6
sgml-tools-1.0.9-2
docbook-3.0-12
stylesheets-0.11rh-2
jade-1.2.1-6
jadetex-2.5-1

At this point, I was able to produce, LinuxDoc- *and*
DocBook-originating HTML, TeX etc. with commands like the following:

db2dvi  xarticle.sgm # (DocBook)
sgml2latex example.sgml # (LinuxDoc)

Next, I installed the LyX RPMs:

tetex-lyx-1.1.2-1
lyx-1.1.2-1

Now, LyX did find LinuxDoc, but *not* DocBook, as it reported in the
configuration file it generated.

Trying to change that, I attempted to upgrade to sgmltools,v2 with the
RPM

sgmltools-CVS19990807-2

from ftp://ftp.us.sgmltools.org

This was not allowed as conflicts were reported with packages
jade-1.2.1-6 and jadetex-2.5-1. Just for testing, I uninstalled the
jade* packages and installed sgmltools-CVS19990807-2. OK. After
reconfiguring, LyX saw DocBook but, rightfully, lost LinuxDoc.

One question is why LyX cannot understand that, although
sgmltools-CVS19990807-2 is not present, DocBook exists on my system.

Another question is if there is a way to convince LyX on that. What I
want is both DTDs present and working, with or without LyX, for obvious
reasons.

TIA

Prokopis



Combination of DocBook, LinuxDoc and LyX -- once more

1999-01-02 Thread Prokopis Prokopidis

Apologies for bringing up this issue again, but I'm a bit confused. On
an intel machine, RedHat 6.1 installed the following teTeX RPMs:

tetex-1.0.6-7
tetex-afm-1.0.6-7
tetex-dvilj-1.0.6-7
tetex-dvips-1.0.6-7
tetex-fonts-1.0.6-7
tetex-latex-1.0.6-7
tetex-xdvi-1.0.6-7

After the installation I added the following sgml related RPMs from the
distribution cd and the RedHat powertools collection
(ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/powertools/6.1/):

sgml-common-0.1-6
sgml-tools-1.0.9-2
docbook-3.0-12
stylesheets-0.11rh-2
jade-1.2.1-6
jadetex-2.5-1

At this point, I was able to produce, LinuxDoc- *and*
DocBook-originating HTML, TeX etc. with commands like the following:

db2dvi  xarticle.sgm # (DocBook)
sgml2latex example.sgml # (LinuxDoc)

Next, I installed the LyX RPMs:

tetex-lyx-1.1.2-1
lyx-1.1.2-1

Now, LyX did find LinuxDoc, but *not* DocBook, as it reported in the
configuration file it generated.

Trying to change that, I attempted to upgrade to sgmltools,v2 with the
RPM

sgmltools-CVS19990807-2

from ftp://ftp.us.sgmltools.org

This was not allowed as conflicts were reported with packages
jade-1.2.1-6 and jadetex-2.5-1. Just for testing, I uninstalled the
jade* packages and installed sgmltools-CVS19990807-2. OK. After
reconfiguring, LyX saw DocBook but, rightfully, lost LinuxDoc.

One question is why LyX cannot understand that, although
sgmltools-CVS19990807-2 is not present, DocBook exists on my system.

Another question is if there is a way to convince LyX on that. What I
want is both DTDs present and working, with or without LyX, for obvious
reasons.

TIA

Prokopis