Converter not in /usr/bin; fixing nbsp
Hi,
due to some reasons I don't want to put my converter into /usr/bin
neither /usr/local/bin. It's, let's say, somewhere in my home
directory. But when I put into converter list: /home/me/my_converter -
it doesn't work. Yep, path's correct and double checked ;-)
The second problem for me is making non-breaking spaces between a
single letter and a word. It's necessary in polish typography. It can
be done with a simple script:
#!/bin/bash
if [ $1 ]; then
cat $1 | sed '
/ [aeiouwzAEIOUWZ] *$/ {
N
s/ *\([aeiouwzAEIOUWZ]\)\n */ \1~/g
}' | sed 's/^ *\([aeiouwzAEIOUWZ]\) */ \1~/g' | sed 's/
*\([aeiouwzAEIOUWZ]\) */ \1~/g'
fi
but sometimes it breaks my document. Is there a way to run this script
only in text blocks, i.e. omit arguments of commands and maths.
Tomasz
Converter not in /usr/bin; fixing nbsp
Hi,
due to some reasons I don't want to put my converter into /usr/bin
neither /usr/local/bin. It's, let's say, somewhere in my home
directory. But when I put into converter list: /home/me/my_converter -
it doesn't work. Yep, path's correct and double checked ;-)
The second problem for me is making non-breaking spaces between a
single letter and a word. It's necessary in polish typography. It can
be done with a simple script:
#!/bin/bash
if [ $1 ]; then
cat $1 | sed '
/ [aeiouwzAEIOUWZ] *$/ {
N
s/ *\([aeiouwzAEIOUWZ]\)\n */ \1~/g
}' | sed 's/^ *\([aeiouwzAEIOUWZ]\) */ \1~/g' | sed 's/
*\([aeiouwzAEIOUWZ]\) */ \1~/g'
fi
but sometimes it breaks my document. Is there a way to run this script
only in text blocks, i.e. omit arguments of commands and maths.
Tomasz
Converter not in /usr/bin; fixing nbsp
Hi,
due to some reasons I don't want to put my "converter" into /usr/bin
neither /usr/local/bin. It's, let's say, somewhere in my home
directory. But when I put into converter list: /home/me/my_converter -
it doesn't work. Yep, path's correct and double checked ;-)
The second problem for me is making non-breaking spaces between a
single letter and a word. It's necessary in polish typography. It can
be done with a simple script:
#!/bin/bash
if [ "$1" ]; then
cat "$1" | sed '
/ [aeiouwzAEIOUWZ] *$/ {
N
s/ *\([aeiouwzAEIOUWZ]\)\n */ \1~/g
}' | sed 's/^ *\([aeiouwzAEIOUWZ]\) */ \1~/g' | sed 's/
*\([aeiouwzAEIOUWZ]\) */ \1~/g'
fi
but sometimes it breaks my document. Is there a way to run this script
only in text blocks, i.e. omit arguments of commands and maths.
Tomasz
Re: Specific converter and child documents
Any news about this matter? I'd like to see it integrated somehow into lyx. There's also well known script called sierotki.el which works, as I read, well with emacs. I've to emphasize that eliminating that single letters on the end of each line in polish typography is very important. Can I somehow help? 2008/11/16 Tomasz Kołodziejski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yeah, I think it'd be quite useful. My script is very easy and as far as I remember it can break something when in your image there's such a single letter (it's stupid and inserts ~ almost everywhere ;-)). You can see it here - http://neo.mlodzi.pl/sierotki (three links described in polish: sierotki - script adding ~, pdflatex_pl described in my previous post and licence) Now you can also try a bug I was writing about. Pozdrawiam ;-)
Re: Specific converter and child documents
Any news about this matter? I'd like to see it integrated somehow into lyx. There's also well known script called sierotki.el which works, as I read, well with emacs. I've to emphasize that eliminating that single letters on the end of each line in polish typography is very important. Can I somehow help? 2008/11/16 Tomasz Kołodziejski [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Yeah, I think it'd be quite useful. My script is very easy and as far as I remember it can break something when in your image there's such a single letter (it's stupid and inserts ~ almost everywhere ;-)). You can see it here - http://neo.mlodzi.pl/sierotki (three links described in polish: sierotki - script adding ~, pdflatex_pl described in my previous post and licence) Now you can also try a bug I was writing about. Pozdrawiam ;-)
Re: Specific converter and child documents
Any news about this matter? I'd like to see it integrated somehow into lyx. There's also well known script called sierotki.el which works, as I read, well with emacs. I've to emphasize that eliminating that single letters on the end of each line in polish typography is very important. Can I somehow help? 2008/11/16 Tomasz Kołodziejski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Yeah, I think it'd be quite useful. > > My script is very easy and as far as I remember it can break something > when in your image there's such a single letter (it's stupid and > inserts ~ almost everywhere ;-)). You can see it here - > http://neo.mlodzi.pl/sierotki (three links described in polish: > sierotki - script adding ~, pdflatex_pl described in my previous post > and licence) > > Now you can also try a bug I was writing about. > > Pozdrawiam ;-)
Specific converter and child documents
Yeah, I think it'd be quite useful. My script is very easy and as far as I remember it can break something when in your image there's such a single letter (it's stupid and inserts ~ almost everywhere ;-)). You can see it here - http://neo.mlodzi.pl/sierotki (three links described in polish: sierotki - script adding ~, pdflatex_pl described in my previous post and licence) Now you can also try a bug I was writing about. Pozdrawiam ;-)
Specific converter and child documents
Yeah, I think it'd be quite useful. My script is very easy and as far as I remember it can break something when in your image there's such a single letter (it's stupid and inserts ~ almost everywhere ;-)). You can see it here - http://neo.mlodzi.pl/sierotki (three links described in polish: sierotki - script adding ~, pdflatex_pl described in my previous post and licence) Now you can also try a bug I was writing about. Pozdrawiam ;-)
Specific converter and child documents
Yeah, I think it'd be quite useful. My script is very easy and as far as I remember it can break something when in your image there's such a single letter (it's stupid and inserts ~ almost everywhere ;-)). You can see it here - http://neo.mlodzi.pl/sierotki (three links described in polish: sierotki - script adding ~, pdflatex_pl described in my previous post and licence) Now you can also try a bug I was writing about. Pozdrawiam ;-)
Specific converter and child documents
Hi, I wanted to create quite a big document. I use a lot inserting child documents. I've created a script called latex_pl which inserts ~ between every letter a, e, i, o and so on. It's required by polish typography. (for example - you shouldn't leave letter a alone on the end of a line; nevermind) So I've added that script into converters section somewhere in lyx options. It works with no problem when I click pdflatex preview with a single document. But when I click same button on a document with inserts of child documents - it looks like they're compiling using normal pdflatex not my modified one. Why? And how can I fix it? By the way, thanks for 1.6! Regards, Tomek
Specific converter and child documents
Hi, I wanted to create quite a big document. I use a lot inserting child documents. I've created a script called latex_pl which inserts ~ between every letter a, e, i, o and so on. It's required by polish typography. (for example - you shouldn't leave letter a alone on the end of a line; nevermind) So I've added that script into converters section somewhere in lyx options. It works with no problem when I click pdflatex preview with a single document. But when I click same button on a document with inserts of child documents - it looks like they're compiling using normal pdflatex not my modified one. Why? And how can I fix it? By the way, thanks for 1.6! Regards, Tomek
Specific converter and child documents
Hi, I wanted to create quite a big document. I use a lot inserting child documents. I've created a script called latex_pl which inserts ~ between every letter a, e, i, o and so on. It's required by polish typography. (for example - you shouldn't leave letter "a" alone on the end of a line; nevermind) So I've added that script into converters section somewhere in lyx options. It works with no problem when I click pdflatex preview with a single document. But when I click same button on a document with inserts of child documents - it looks like they're compiling using normal pdflatex not my modified one. Why? And how can I fix it? By the way, thanks for 1.6! Regards, Tomek
1.5.6 deb
Hi, since I experienced some problems with using the opensuse rpm package I compiled from source myself. I really like LyX so I want help others to use it. I've created a package for Ubuntu Hardy which you can find on my server --- http://neo.mlodzi.pl/tmp/lyx_1.5.6-1_i386.deb . I'd like to see it copied ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.5.6 (- here ;-)). If someone read this e-mail I'd like to get an answer whether I write into a vacuum or not. Thanks a lot for your effort, Tomasz Kołodziejski
1.5.6 deb
Hi, since I experienced some problems with using the opensuse rpm package I compiled from source myself. I really like LyX so I want help others to use it. I've created a package for Ubuntu Hardy which you can find on my server --- http://neo.mlodzi.pl/tmp/lyx_1.5.6-1_i386.deb . I'd like to see it copied ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.5.6 (- here ;-)). If someone read this e-mail I'd like to get an answer whether I write into a vacuum or not. Thanks a lot for your effort, Tomasz Kołodziejski
1.5.6 deb
Hi, since I experienced some problems with using the opensuse rpm package I compiled from source myself. I really like LyX so I want help others to use it. I've created a package for Ubuntu Hardy which you can find on my server --- http://neo.mlodzi.pl/tmp/lyx_1.5.6-1_i386.deb . I'd like to see it copied ftp://ftp.lyx.org/pub/lyx/bin/1.5.6 (<- here ;-)). If someone read this e-mail I'd like to get an answer whether I write into a vacuum or not. Thanks a lot for your effort, Tomasz Kołodziejski
