Re: \underrrightarrow not working
> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Andre> On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 02:52:58PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: >> Actually, it's something of a conscious decision. Andre didn't want >> to force the user to use AMSMath. Maybe he uses a package that >> defines \underrightarrow that we don't know about. Andre> No, I think I just forgot ams in the inset's validate. But I Andre> think I fixed this already several times... For information, this bug is now fixed for both 1.3.6cvs and 1.4.0cvs. JMarc
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
On Fri, 2004-11-26 at 21:40 +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > Johannes Behr wrote: > > > Can I just switch on the ams package and the > > rest of my standard latex math formulas would > > stay the same? > > yes, see 3rd link below OK, got it. Thanks again. regards, Johannes
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 02:52:58PM +, Angus Leeming wrote: > Actually, it's something of a conscious decision. Andre didn't want > to force the user to use AMSMath. Maybe he uses a package that > defines \underrightarrow that we don't know about. No, I think I just forgot ams in the inset's validate. But I think I fixed this already several times... Andre'
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
On Thu, Nov 25, 2004 at 02:47:15PM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: > >Johannes Behr wrote: > > > >>I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from > >>the math-panel inside of a display formula. > > > > > >Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the > >'Layout->Document' dialog. > > this is a bug, when it is not done by LyX! Indeed. Andre'
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
Johannes Behr wrote: Can I just switch on the ams package and the rest of my standard latex math formulas would stay the same? yes, see 3rd link below Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
On Thu, 2004-11-25 at 14:37 +0100, Herbert Voss wrote: > Johannes Behr wrote: > > > Does the activation of the AMS math package change > > any of my other formulas ? > > no. > The amcros from amsmath are much more better than the > default LaTeX ones. OK. thanks. Just to be sure: Does the amsmath package extent or, at least partly, replace the standard set of latex math commands? Can I just switch on the ams package and the rest of my standard latex math formulas would stay the same? Regards, johannes
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
Herbert Voss wrote: > Angus Leeming wrote: >> Johannes Behr wrote: >> >>>I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from >>>the math-panel inside of a display formula. >> >> >> Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the >> 'Layout->Document' dialog. > > this is a bug, when it is not done by LyX! Maybe. Actually, it's something of a conscious decision. Andre didn't want to force the user to use AMSMath. Maybe he uses a package that defines \underrightarrow that we don't know about. LyX 1.3.x has a simple check box, 'Use AMS math'. LyX 1.4.x has a combo box: Don't use AMS math Use AMS math Let LyX guess That should keep everybody reasonably happy until someone writes a proper package manager. Which reminds me, someone did ;-) What happened to it, Herbert? -- Angus
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
Angus Leeming wrote: Johannes Behr wrote: I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from the math-panel inside of a display formula. Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the 'Layout->Document' dialog. this is a bug, when it is not done by LyX! Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
Johannes Behr wrote: Does the activation of the AMS math package change any of my other formulas ? no. The amcros from amsmath are much more better than the default LaTeX ones. Herbert -- http://TeXnik.de/ http://PSTricks.de/ ftp://ftp.dante.de/tex-archive/info/math/voss/Voss-Mathmode.pdf http://www.dante.de/faq/de-tex-faq/ http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?introduction=yes
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
Johannes Behr wrote: > Hi Angus, > > thanks for the fast help > >> > I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from >> > the math-panel inside of a display formula. >> >> Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the >> 'Layout->Document' dialog. >> > > OK, works! But now my document depends on the ams packages. Well :( > > Does the activation of the AMS math package change > any of my other formulas ? How can I answer that? Alternatively, define \underrightarrow in your preamble... -- Angus
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
Hi Angus, thanks for the fast help > > I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from > > the math-panel inside of a display formula. > > Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the > 'Layout->Document' dialog. > OK, works! But now my document depends on the ams packages. Well :( Does the activation of the AMS math package change any of my other formulas ? Regards, Johannes
Re: \underrrightarrow not working
Johannes Behr wrote: > I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from > the math-panel inside of a display formula. Check the 'Use AMS math' button in the 'Packages' pane of the 'Layout->Document' dialog. -- Angus
\underrrightarrow not working
Hi,
I tried to use the \underrightarrow Frame decorator from
the math-panel inside of a display formula.
Lyx shows the arrow correctly but latex just
stops with the following error message:
---
Undefined control sequence.
A\underrightarrow
{trans}B\]
The control sequence at the end of the top line
of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
---
Is this a bug in my latex backend or do I need
an extra package?
I'm running lyx 1.3.4 on a ubuntu/warty linux box.
A tiny test file showing the error is attachet.
Regards,
Johannes
lyx-error-underrrightarrow.lyx
Description: application/lyx
