Re: Are subsection numbers not reseted after changing to a new chapter?
On 02/06/2008, at 16.10, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: Jon Bendtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: subsections are rest with each new section, not each new chapter. why do chapters restore new sections, but not new subsections? It is coded like that (and matches LaTeX, I just checked) because one is not supposed to have a subsection without an enclosing section Okay. I just dont like using a section right there, and i dont fancy moving my subsections up to section level, so i have decided to use subsection* and avoid the numbering problem. Maybe i should start using parts JonB
Re: Are subsection numbers not reseted after changing to a new chapter?
Jon Bendtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi > > I have chosen document class report > > i have chapter 1, with section 1.1, and subsections 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 > > Then i start chapter 2, and i have a subsection that jumps directly to > 2.0.3? > > I would have expected 2.0.1, why .3? I am not surprised that LyX does that (this is how I coded it :), but what does the LaTeX output look like? subsections are rest with each new section, not each new chapter. JMarc
Re: Are subsection numbers not reseted after changing to a new chapter?
On 2.06.08, Jon Bendtsen wrote: > I have chosen document class report ... > Then i start chapter 2, and i have a subsection that jumps directly to > 2.0.3? > I would have expected 2.0.1, why .3? This is strange indeed and should not happen. It is also not yet heard of, so I do not epxect this to be default behaviour. Try to create a *minimal* example that shows this behaviour and post it here. (Maybe in the course you will even find the reason in some part of your document.) Günter
Are subsection numbers not reseted after changing to a new chapter?
Hi I have chosen document class report i have chapter 1, with section 1.1, and subsections 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 Then i start chapter 2, and i have a subsection that jumps directly to 2.0.3? I would have expected 2.0.1, why .3? JonB
