Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On 19 May 2012 09:30, stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 5/18/12 7:31 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with (author?) and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. There are various ways to handle this. The problem, such as it is, is due to the fact that, if you compile the child document standalone, then it's treated as its own document, and not as a child. Option 1 is to compile the master document instead, which you can do from the View menu, and assign a shortcut to do. Option 2 is more complicated, and involves putting a bibliography inset into the child, but protecting it with a LaTeX if-then construct, so that it isn't actually included when you compile the master. So it's not really a bug, but a consequence of how LyX handles children. Third option: Always compile from the master document, but include only the child document you want to compile. That will bring in the frontmatter, probably (depending on how you structured your master/children), but t might do what you want. The command is in DocumentSettings Thanks guys. Yes, that's correct, I know I can view the master document and that's what I've been doing. Even though I knew it was inherent due to how LyX works I perceived it as a bug, simply because I expected the child to inherit most other stuff (since it can already work with the bib database while editing). For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a number of chapters. The last two workarounds mentioned should get me going, but I think the third option is the best approach since I'd want the child to inherit everything. A couple pages worth of abstracts and references shouldn't add that much of a compile time. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On Sat, May 19, 2012, Ray Rashif wrote: For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a number of chapters. FWIW, it's certainly possible and convenient to have a single lyx document with hundreds of pages and many chapters. I've written several books of 500-1000 pages, and appreciate the simplicity of only dealing with a single file, and being able to navigate around without having to load new files. I've never seen any slowness that bothered me. Your mileage may vary. dave case
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On 20 May 2012 05:05, case c...@biomaps.rutgers.edu wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2012, Ray Rashif wrote: For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a number of chapters. FWIW, it's certainly possible and convenient to have a single lyx document with hundreds of pages and many chapters. I've written several books of 500-1000 pages, and appreciate the simplicity of only dealing with a single file, and being able to navigate around without having to load new files. I've never seen any slowness that bothered me. Your mileage may vary. That's comforting to know, especially if it's not going to take that much time to compile the whole document with figures and all that. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On Sat, 19 May 2012 17:05:21 -0400, case said: On Sat, May 19, 2012, Ray Rashif wrote: For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a number of chapters. FWIW, it's certainly possible and convenient to have a single lyx document with hundreds of pages and many chapters. I've written several books of 500-1000 pages, and appreciate the simplicity of only dealing with a single file, and being able to navigate around without having to load new files. I've never seen any slowness that bothered me. Your mileage may vary. dave case +1. I've written three books around three hundred pages each, and in each case the ability to handle it as a single file was wonderful. Thanks SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ * http://twitter.com/stevelitt Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On 19 May 2012 09:30, stefano franchi stefano.fran...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 5/18/12 7:31 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with (author?) and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. There are various ways to handle this. The problem, such as it is, is due to the fact that, if you compile the child document standalone, then it's treated as its own document, and not as a child. Option 1 is to compile the master document instead, which you can do from the View menu, and assign a shortcut to do. Option 2 is more complicated, and involves putting a bibliography inset into the child, but protecting it with a LaTeX if-then construct, so that it isn't actually included when you compile the master. So it's not really a bug, but a consequence of how LyX handles children. Third option: Always compile from the master document, but include only the child document you want to compile. That will bring in the frontmatter, probably (depending on how you structured your master/children), but t might do what you want. The command is in DocumentSettings Thanks guys. Yes, that's correct, I know I can view the master document and that's what I've been doing. Even though I knew it was inherent due to how LyX works I perceived it as a bug, simply because I expected the child to inherit most other stuff (since it can already work with the bib database while editing). For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a number of chapters. The last two workarounds mentioned should get me going, but I think the third option is the best approach since I'd want the child to inherit everything. A couple pages worth of abstracts and references shouldn't add that much of a compile time. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On Sat, May 19, 2012, Ray Rashif wrote: For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a number of chapters. FWIW, it's certainly possible and convenient to have a single lyx document with hundreds of pages and many chapters. I've written several books of 500-1000 pages, and appreciate the simplicity of only dealing with a single file, and being able to navigate around without having to load new files. I've never seen any slowness that bothered me. Your mileage may vary. dave case
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On 20 May 2012 05:05, case c...@biomaps.rutgers.edu wrote: On Sat, May 19, 2012, Ray Rashif wrote: For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a number of chapters. FWIW, it's certainly possible and convenient to have a single lyx document with hundreds of pages and many chapters. I've written several books of 500-1000 pages, and appreciate the simplicity of only dealing with a single file, and being able to navigate around without having to load new files. I've never seen any slowness that bothered me. Your mileage may vary. That's comforting to know, especially if it's not going to take that much time to compile the whole document with figures and all that. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On Sat, 19 May 2012 17:05:21 -0400, case said: On Sat, May 19, 2012, Ray Rashif wrote: For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a number of chapters. FWIW, it's certainly possible and convenient to have a single lyx document with hundreds of pages and many chapters. I've written several books of 500-1000 pages, and appreciate the simplicity of only dealing with a single file, and being able to navigate around without having to load new files. I've never seen any slowness that bothered me. Your mileage may vary. dave case +1. I've written three books around three hundred pages each, and in each case the ability to handle it as a single file was wonderful. Thanks SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ * http://twitter.com/stevelitt Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On 19 May 2012 09:30, stefano franchiwrote: > On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Richard Heck wrote: >> On 5/18/12 7:31 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: >>> >>> Hi guys >>> >>> I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on >>> this [1] but I believe it's a little different. >>> >>> When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child >>> document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child >>> document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, >>> however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with >>> "(author?)" and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for >>> that child document. >>> >>> Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while >>> rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are >>> valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You >>> can reproduce this with a template [2]. >>> >> There are various ways to handle this. The problem, such as it is, is due >> to the fact that, if you compile the child document "standalone", then it's >> treated as its own document, and not as a child. Option 1 is to compile >> the master document instead, which you can do from the View menu, and >> assign a shortcut to do. Option 2 is more complicated, and involves putting >> a bibliography inset into the child, but protecting it with a LaTeX if-then >> construct, so that it isn't actually included when you compile the master. >> >> So it's not really a bug, but a consequence of how LyX handles children. > > Third option: > > Always compile from the master document, but include only the child > document you want to compile. That will bring in the frontmatter, > probably (depending on how you structured your master/children), but t > might do what you want. The command is in Document>>Settings Thanks guys. Yes, that's correct, I know I can view the master document and that's what I've been doing. Even though I knew it was inherent due to how LyX works I perceived it as a bug, simply because I expected the child to inherit most other stuff (since it can already work with the bib database while editing). For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a number of chapters. The last two workarounds mentioned should get me going, but I think the third option is the best approach since I'd want the child to inherit everything. A couple pages worth of abstracts and references shouldn't add that much of a compile time. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On Sat, May 19, 2012, Ray Rashif wrote: > For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going > to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a > number of chapters. FWIW, it's certainly possible and convenient to have a single lyx document with hundreds of pages and many chapters. I've written several books of 500-1000 pages, and appreciate the simplicity of only dealing with a single file, and being able to navigate around without having to load new files. I've never seen any slowness that bothered me. Your mileage may vary. dave case
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On 20 May 2012 05:05, casewrote: > On Sat, May 19, 2012, Ray Rashif wrote: > >> For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going >> to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a >> number of chapters. > > FWIW, it's certainly possible and convenient to have a single lyx document > with hundreds of pages and many chapters. I've written several books of > 500-1000 pages, and appreciate the simplicity of only dealing with a single > file, and being able to navigate around without having to load new files. > I've never seen any slowness that bothered me. Your mileage may vary. That's comforting to know, especially if it's not going to take that much time to compile the whole document with figures and all that. -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On Sat, 19 May 2012 17:05:21 -0400, case said: > On Sat, May 19, 2012, Ray Rashif wrote: > > > For now I don't see much of a problem but I don't know how I'm going > > to deal with it once I'm in the range of hundreds of pages and a > > number of chapters. > > FWIW, it's certainly possible and convenient to have a single lyx > document with hundreds of pages and many chapters. I've written > several books of 500-1000 pages, and appreciate the simplicity of > only dealing with a single file, and being able to navigate around > without having to load new files. I've never seen any slowness that > bothered me. Your mileage may vary. > > dave case +1. I've written three books around three hundred pages each, and in each case the ability to handle it as a single file was wonderful. Thanks SteveT Steve Litt* http://www.troubleshooters.com/ * http://twitter.com/stevelitt Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance
Child documents, integration and citation
Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with (author?) and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg77181.html [2] https://github.com/telegraphic/Oxford-LyX-Thesis-Template -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On 5/18/12 7:31 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with (author?) and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. There are various ways to handle this. The problem, such as it is, is due to the fact that, if you compile the child document standalone, then it's treated as its own document, and not as a child. Option 1 is to compile the master document instead, which you can do from the View menu, and assign a shortcut to do. Option 2 is more complicated, and involves putting a bibliography inset into the child, but protecting it with a LaTeX if-then construct, so that it isn't actually included when you compile the master. So it's not really a bug, but a consequence of how LyX handles children. Richard
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 5/18/12 7:31 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with (author?) and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. There are various ways to handle this. The problem, such as it is, is due to the fact that, if you compile the child document standalone, then it's treated as its own document, and not as a child. Option 1 is to compile the master document instead, which you can do from the View menu, and assign a shortcut to do. Option 2 is more complicated, and involves putting a bibliography inset into the child, but protecting it with a LaTeX if-then construct, so that it isn't actually included when you compile the master. So it's not really a bug, but a consequence of how LyX handles children. Third option: Always compile from the master document, but include only the child document you want to compile. That will bring in the frontmatter, probably (depending on how you structured your master/children), but t might do what you want. The command is in DocumentSettings Cheers, Stefano -- __ Stefano Franchi Associate Research Professor Department of Hispanic Studies Ph: +1 (979) 845-2125 Texas AM University Fax: +1 (979) 845-6421 College Station, Texas, USA stef...@tamu.edu http://stefano.cleinias.org
Child documents, integration and citation
Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with (author?) and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg77181.html [2] https://github.com/telegraphic/Oxford-LyX-Thesis-Template -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On 5/18/12 7:31 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with (author?) and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. There are various ways to handle this. The problem, such as it is, is due to the fact that, if you compile the child document standalone, then it's treated as its own document, and not as a child. Option 1 is to compile the master document instead, which you can do from the View menu, and assign a shortcut to do. Option 2 is more complicated, and involves putting a bibliography inset into the child, but protecting it with a LaTeX if-then construct, so that it isn't actually included when you compile the master. So it's not really a bug, but a consequence of how LyX handles children. Richard
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Richard Heck rgh...@comcast.net wrote: On 5/18/12 7:31 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with (author?) and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. There are various ways to handle this. The problem, such as it is, is due to the fact that, if you compile the child document standalone, then it's treated as its own document, and not as a child. Option 1 is to compile the master document instead, which you can do from the View menu, and assign a shortcut to do. Option 2 is more complicated, and involves putting a bibliography inset into the child, but protecting it with a LaTeX if-then construct, so that it isn't actually included when you compile the master. So it's not really a bug, but a consequence of how LyX handles children. Third option: Always compile from the master document, but include only the child document you want to compile. That will bring in the frontmatter, probably (depending on how you structured your master/children), but t might do what you want. The command is in DocumentSettings Cheers, Stefano -- __ Stefano Franchi Associate Research Professor Department of Hispanic Studies Ph: +1 (979) 845-2125 Texas AM University Fax: +1 (979) 845-6421 College Station, Texas, USA stef...@tamu.edu http://stefano.cleinias.org
Child documents, integration and citation
Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with "(author?)" and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/lyx-users@lists.lyx.org/msg77181.html [2] https://github.com/telegraphic/Oxford-LyX-Thesis-Template -- GPG/PGP ID: C0711BF1
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On 5/18/12 7:31 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: Hi guys I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on this [1] but I believe it's a little different. When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with "(author?)" and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for that child document. Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You can reproduce this with a template [2]. There are various ways to handle this. The problem, such as it is, is due to the fact that, if you compile the child document "standalone", then it's treated as its own document, and not as a child. Option 1 is to compile the master document instead, which you can do from the View menu, and assign a shortcut to do. Option 2 is more complicated, and involves putting a bibliography inset into the child, but protecting it with a LaTeX if-then construct, so that it isn't actually included when you compile the master. So it's not really a bug, but a consequence of how LyX handles children. Richard
Re: Child documents, integration and citation
On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 8:59 PM, Richard Heckwrote: > On 5/18/12 7:31 AM, Ray Rashif wrote: >> >> Hi guys >> >> I want to confirm that this is a bug. I've noticed some old threads on >> this [1] but I believe it's a little different. >> >> When the master document includes the bibliography, opening the child >> document and adding a citation works. So, while editing, the child >> document is aware of the bib database. When compiling for preview, >> however, that knowledge is lost and citations are replaced with >> "(author?)" and the like. Obviously, there is no reference list for >> that child document. >> >> Wouldn't it be possible to actually integrate the child document while >> rendering? Do not show the references, but do show citations that are >> valid (i.e. that exists in the bib included in the master doc). You >> can reproduce this with a template [2]. >> > There are various ways to handle this. The problem, such as it is, is due > to the fact that, if you compile the child document "standalone", then it's > treated as its own document, and not as a child. Option 1 is to compile > the master document instead, which you can do from the View menu, and > assign a shortcut to do. Option 2 is more complicated, and involves putting > a bibliography inset into the child, but protecting it with a LaTeX if-then > construct, so that it isn't actually included when you compile the master. > > So it's not really a bug, but a consequence of how LyX handles children. Third option: Always compile from the master document, but include only the child document you want to compile. That will bring in the frontmatter, probably (depending on how you structured your master/children), but t might do what you want. The command is in Document>>Settings Cheers, Stefano -- __ Stefano Franchi Associate Research Professor Department of Hispanic Studies Ph: +1 (979) 845-2125 Texas A University Fax: +1 (979) 845-6421 College Station, Texas, USA stef...@tamu.edu http://stefano.cleinias.org