Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
Hello,
I did not manage to introduce a latex command without
parameters in a layout, to have in the style manu
instead of ERT.
Example:
Style Foo
LatexNamefoo
...
End
results in
\foo{}
in the exported .tex file.
I'd like to have
\foo
without the {}
lyx-1.0.4, Sun Solaris 2.6
Regards
--
Jean-Pierre
Re: Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 Dec 1999 12:06:41 +0100
"Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jean-Pierre Hello, I did not manage to introduce a latex command
Jean-Pierre without parameters in a layout, to have in the style manu
Jean-Pierre instead of ERT. Example: Style Foo LatexName foo ... End
Jean-Pierre results in \foo{} in the exported .tex file. I'd like to
Jean-Pierre have \foo without the {}
This not very easy indeed, but the {} should not matter if \foo does
not take parameters. What do you want to do exactly?
JMarc
Sorry to have bothered you and the mailing list readers.
I misinterpreted an error message, \foo{} was all right.
--
Jean-Pierre
Re: Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
You can use "KeepEmpty 1", but the empty {} will still exist. I doesn't
hurts. Example:
# Appendix style definition
Style Appendix
MarginDynamic
LatexType Command
LatexName appendix
NeedProtect 1
NextNoIndent 1
ParSkip 0.4
TopSep4
BottomSep 0.8
ParSep0.8
Align Block
AlignPossible Block
LabelType Static
KeepEmpty 1
LabelString "Appendix"
# standard font definition
Font
Series Bold
SizeLarge
Color Blue
EndFont
End
One thing I'd like to see in LyX is the support for optional parameters
like in
\chapter[Name in toc]{Long, long, long name}
Currently it is possible tu use a trick in the layout setting LabelType to
"Manual". Other interesting feature would be commands with more than one
parameter like
\foo{bar}{baz}
Casantos
--
Computers make excellent and efficient servants, but I have no wish to
serve under them. Captain, a starship also runs on loyalty to one
man. And nothing can replace it or him.
-- Spock, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4729.4
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
I did not manage to introduce a latex command without parameters in a
layout
...
results in
\foo{}
in the exported .tex file.
I'd like to have
\foo
without the {}
Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
Hello,
I did not manage to introduce a latex command without
parameters in a layout, to have in the style manu
instead of ERT.
Example:
Style Foo
LatexNamefoo
...
End
results in
\foo{}
in the exported .tex file.
I'd like to have
\foo
without the {}
lyx-1.0.4, Sun Solaris 2.6
Regards
--
Jean-Pierre
Re: Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 21 Dec 1999 12:06:41 +0100
"Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Jean-Pierre Hello, I did not manage to introduce a latex command
Jean-Pierre without parameters in a layout, to have in the style manu
Jean-Pierre instead of ERT. Example: Style Foo LatexName foo ... End
Jean-Pierre results in \foo{} in the exported .tex file. I'd like to
Jean-Pierre have \foo without the {}
This not very easy indeed, but the {} should not matter if \foo does
not take parameters. What do you want to do exactly?
JMarc
Sorry to have bothered you and the mailing list readers.
I misinterpreted an error message, \foo{} was all right.
--
Jean-Pierre
Re: Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
You can use "KeepEmpty 1", but the empty {} will still exist. I doesn't
hurts. Example:
# Appendix style definition
Style Appendix
MarginDynamic
LatexType Command
LatexName appendix
NeedProtect 1
NextNoIndent 1
ParSkip 0.4
TopSep4
BottomSep 0.8
ParSep0.8
Align Block
AlignPossible Block
LabelType Static
KeepEmpty 1
LabelString "Appendix"
# standard font definition
Font
Series Bold
SizeLarge
Color Blue
EndFont
End
One thing I'd like to see in LyX is the support for optional parameters
like in
\chapter[Name in toc]{Long, long, long name}
Currently it is possible tu use a trick in the layout setting LabelType to
"Manual". Other interesting feature would be commands with more than one
parameter like
\foo{bar}{baz}
Casantos
--
Computers make excellent and efficient servants, but I have no wish to
serve under them. Captain, a starship also runs on loyalty to one
man. And nothing can replace it or him.
-- Spock, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4729.4
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
I did not manage to introduce a latex command without parameters in a
layout
...
results in
\foo{}
in the exported .tex file.
I'd like to have
\foo
without the {}
Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
Hello,
I did not manage to introduce a latex command without
parameters in a layout, to have in the style manu
instead of ERT.
Example:
Style Foo
LatexNamefoo
...
End
results in
\foo{}
in the exported .tex file.
I'd like to have
\foo
without the {}
lyx-1.0.4, Sun Solaris 2.6
Regards
--
Jean-Pierre
Re: Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
>>From: Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Date: 21 Dec 1999 12:06:41 +0100
>>
>>> "Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>>
>>Jean-Pierre> Hello, I did not manage to introduce a latex command
>>Jean-Pierre> without parameters in a layout, to have in the style manu
>>Jean-Pierre> instead of ERT. Example: Style Foo LatexName foo ... End
>>
>>Jean-Pierre> results in \foo{} in the exported .tex file. I'd like to
>>Jean-Pierre> have \foo without the {}
>>
>>This not very easy indeed, but the {} should not matter if \foo does
>>not take parameters. What do you want to do exactly?
>>
>>JMarc
Sorry to have bothered you and the mailing list readers.
I misinterpreted an error message, \foo{} was all right.
--
Jean-Pierre
Re: Introduction of a parameterless command in a layout
You can use "KeepEmpty 1", but the empty {} will still exist. I doesn't
hurts. Example:
# Appendix style definition
Style Appendix
MarginDynamic
LatexType Command
LatexName appendix
NeedProtect 1
NextNoIndent 1
ParSkip 0.4
TopSep4
BottomSep 0.8
ParSep0.8
Align Block
AlignPossible Block
LabelType Static
KeepEmpty 1
LabelString "Appendix"
# standard font definition
Font
Series Bold
SizeLarge
Color Blue
EndFont
End
One thing I'd like to see in LyX is the support for optional parameters
like in
\chapter[Name in toc]{Long, long, long name}
Currently it is possible tu use a trick in the layout setting LabelType to
"Manual". Other interesting feature would be commands with more than one
parameter like
\foo{bar}{baz}
Casantos
--
Computers make excellent and efficient servants, but I have no wish to
serve under them. Captain, a starship also runs on loyalty to one
man. And nothing can replace it or him.
-- Spock, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4729.4
On Tue, 21 Dec 1999, Jean-Pierre.Chretien wrote:
> I did not manage to introduce a latex command without parameters in a
> layout
...
> results in
> \foo{}
> in the exported .tex file.
> I'd like to have
> \foo
> without the {}
