Re: LinguistLyx: label on group of subexamples
2010/2/24 Maria Gouskova :
> I haven't found a way to do it using Covington numbering, which is
> what I usually use. You can either have all examples numbered as
> sub-examples and not have a group heading for them, or just use crude
> manual numbering for your (a) and (b) sub-examples and use automatic
> labeling and cross-referencing for the main example.
>
> Maria
>
> 2010/2/23 Petr Šimon :
>> 2010/2/23 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>>> Petr Šimon wrote:
I have in mind something like this:
\begin{example} \label{1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item a \label{1a}
\item b label{1b}
So that I can refer to all the subexamples by 1 and to each
individually, 1a and 1b.
I would hope that when I add a subexample a group label would be inserted.
Is this possible from the layout definitions? I tried to look at it
briefly, but it wasn't clear to me how that would be possible.
>>>
>>> No. You will need to use ERT.
>>>
>>> Jürgen
>>>
>>
>> Ok, thanks.
>> Perhaps it could be added later? Right now the subexamples make little
>> sense when they can't be referred to as a group.
>> Petr
>>
>
Thanks Maria. Yes, I know. I was wandering if it would be possible to
do it the way subequations are done (only without the "super"
equation).
I came up with the following, only if it was possible to do it without ERT
\renewcommand{\labelenumi}{(\arabic{enumi})}
\begin{enumerate}
\item \label{1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item \label{1a} example a
\item \label{1b} example b
\end{enumerate}
\end{enumerate}
(\ref{1}) and (\ref{1a}) and (\ref{1b})
Petr
Re: LinguistLyx: label on group of subexamples
I haven't found a way to do it using Covington numbering, which is
what I usually use. You can either have all examples numbered as
sub-examples and not have a group heading for them, or just use crude
manual numbering for your (a) and (b) sub-examples and use automatic
labeling and cross-referencing for the main example.
Maria
2010/2/23 Petr Šimon :
> 2010/2/23 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
>> Petr Šimon wrote:
>>> I have in mind something like this:
>>> \begin{example} \label{1}
>>> \begin{enumerate}
>>> \item a \label{1a}
>>> \item b label{1b}
>>>
>>> So that I can refer to all the subexamples by 1 and to each
>>> individually, 1a and 1b.
>>> I would hope that when I add a subexample a group label would be inserted.
>>> Is this possible from the layout definitions? I tried to look at it
>>> briefly, but it wasn't clear to me how that would be possible.
>>
>> No. You will need to use ERT.
>>
>> Jürgen
>>
>
> Ok, thanks.
> Perhaps it could be added later? Right now the subexamples make little
> sense when they can't be referred to as a group.
> Petr
>
Re: LinguistLyx: label on group of subexamples
2010/2/23 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Petr Šimon wrote:
>> I have in mind something like this:
>> \begin{example} \label{1}
>> \begin{enumerate}
>> \item a \label{1a}
>> \item b label{1b}
>>
>> So that I can refer to all the subexamples by 1 and to each
>> individually, 1a and 1b.
>> I would hope that when I add a subexample a group label would be inserted.
>> Is this possible from the layout definitions? I tried to look at it
>> briefly, but it wasn't clear to me how that would be possible.
>
> No. You will need to use ERT.
>
> Jürgen
>
Ok, thanks.
Perhaps it could be added later? Right now the subexamples make little
sense when they can't be referred to as a group.
Petr
Re: LinguistLyx: label on group of subexamples
Petr Šimon wrote:
> I have in mind something like this:
> \begin{example} \label{1}
> \begin{enumerate}
> \item a \label{1a}
> \item b label{1b}
>
> So that I can refer to all the subexamples by 1 and to each
> individually, 1a and 1b.
> I would hope that when I add a subexample a group label would be inserted.
> Is this possible from the layout definitions? I tried to look at it
> briefly, but it wasn't clear to me how that would be possible.
No. You will need to use ERT.
Jürgen
Re: LinguistLyx: label on group of subexamples
2010/2/23 Jürgen Spitzmüller :
> Petr Šimon wrote:
>> (I am not on the list, please CC)
>> Hello,
>> would it be possible to change the subexamples so that a group label
>> is provided. In fact would it be possible to automatically add a label
>> for each subexample (just empty label with prefix such as "ex:" ) and
>> one for the group?
>
> I do not quite understand what you want, but you can redefine the subexamples
> environment. The original definiton is:
>
> \newenvironment{subexample}{%
> \begin{example}\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=1.7em]
> \renewcommand\theenumi{\alph{enumi}}
> \renewcommand\labelenumi{(\theenumi)}
> \renewcomman...@enumi{\theequation\,}}%
> {\end{enumerate}\end{example}}
>
>
>> Many thanks
>> Petr
>
>
> Jürgen
>
I have in mind something like this:
\begin{example} \label{1}
\begin{enumerate}
\item a \label{1a}
\item b label{1b}
So that I can refer to all the subexamples by 1 and to each
individually, 1a and 1b.
I would hope that when I add a subexample a group label would be inserted.
Is this possible from the layout definitions? I tried to look at it
briefly, but it wasn't clear to me how that would be possible.
Many thanks
Petr
Re: LinguistLyx: label on group of subexamples
Petr Šimon wrote:
> (I am not on the list, please CC)
> Hello,
> would it be possible to change the subexamples so that a group label
> is provided. In fact would it be possible to automatically add a label
> for each subexample (just empty label with prefix such as "ex:" ) and
> one for the group?
I do not quite understand what you want, but you can redefine the subexamples
environment. The original definiton is:
\newenvironment{subexample}{%
\begin{example}\begin{enumerate}[leftmargin=1.7em]
\renewcommand\theenumi{\alph{enumi}}
\renewcommand\labelenumi{(\theenumi)}
\renewcomman...@enumi{\theequation\,}}%
{\end{enumerate}\end{example}}
> Many thanks
> Petr
Jürgen
LinguistLyx: label on group of subexamples
(I am not on the list, please CC) Hello, would it be possible to change the subexamples so that a group label is provided. In fact would it be possible to automatically add a label for each subexample (just empty label with prefix such as "ex:" ) and one for the group? Many thanks Petr
