Re: Long Equation

2007-05-03 Thread Helge Hafting

Dan Kaplan wrote:

Dear Lyx Users,

I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite 
right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted 
paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so 
I am
using the stfloats package to allow that.  Then I am using a figure 
float:


\begin{figure*}[!b]
\begin{equation}
% equation
\end{equation}
\end{figure*}

However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the 
bottom

of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!

There is always the work-around solution of simply placing the float on the
previous page.  It will then float to the bottom of the next page, which
will be the correct one. (Unless you wanted it at page 1, which simply
isn't possible.)

This solution may be ok if you have only a few such floats.  It will be
cumbersome if you have many, as any editing may move the page
boundaries.

Helge Hafting




Re: Long Equation

2007-05-03 Thread Helge Hafting

Dan Kaplan wrote:

Dear Lyx Users,

I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite 
right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted 
paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so 
I am
using the stfloats package to allow that.  Then I am using a figure 
float:


\begin{figure*}[!b]
\begin{equation}
% equation
\end{equation}
\end{figure*}

However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the 
bottom

of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!

There is always the work-around solution of simply placing the float on the
previous page.  It will then float to the bottom of the next page, which
will be the correct one. (Unless you wanted it at page 1, which simply
isn't possible.)

This solution may be ok if you have only a few such floats.  It will be
cumbersome if you have many, as any editing may move the page
boundaries.

Helge Hafting




Re: Long Equation

2007-05-03 Thread Helge Hafting

Dan Kaplan wrote:

Dear Lyx Users,

I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite 
right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted 
paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so 
I am
using the stfloats package to allow that.  Then I am using a figure 
float:


\begin{figure*}[!b]
\begin{equation}
% equation
\end{equation}
\end{figure*}

However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the 
bottom

of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!

There is always the work-around solution of simply placing the float on the
previous page.  It will then float to the bottom of the next page, which
will be the correct one. (Unless you wanted it at page 1, which simply
isn't possible.)

This solution may be ok if you have only a few such floats.  It will be
cumbersome if you have many, as any editing may move the page
boundaries.

Helge Hafting




Re: Long Equation

2007-04-27 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Dan Kaplan wrote:


However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the bottom
of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!


Seems to be the nature of the beast: 
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=2colfloat




Re: Long Equation

2007-04-27 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Dan Kaplan wrote:


However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the bottom
of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!


Seems to be the nature of the beast: 
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=2colfloat




Re: Long Equation

2007-04-27 Thread Paul A. Rubin

Dan Kaplan wrote:


However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the bottom
of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!


Seems to be the nature of the beast: 
http://www.tex.ac.uk/cgi-bin/texfaq2html?label=2colfloat




Re: Long Equation

2007-04-26 Thread Dan Kaplan

Dear Lyx Users,

I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so I am
using the stfloats package to allow that.  Then I am using a figure float:

\begin{figure*}[!b]
\begin{equation}
% equation
\end{equation}
\end{figure*}

However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the bottom
of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!

Sincerely,
Dan Kaplan

On 4/25/07, Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Dan Kaplan wrote:
 Dear Lyx Users,

 I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines.
 So I'm
 making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is
 too long
 for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE
 has the
 equation move to the bottom of the page where it can span across both
 columns without breaking. It is further separated from the text by a
 horizontal line. How can I create this with LaTeX?
Use a figure float. (Or a table float or algorithm float if you prefer.)
The type of float only affects the caption.

A figure float may span both columns, and it can be set to appear at
the bottom of the page. It will be numbered too, and the number
can be used for automatic referencing.

Instead of an actual graphich, put your wide formula inside the float.
Take care so it doesn't accidentally get into the caption though.
You can remove the caption if you don't want it - although it is
generally useful to have.

Helge Hafting








Re: Long Equation

2007-04-26 Thread Dan Kaplan

Dear Lyx Users,

I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so I am
using the stfloats package to allow that.  Then I am using a figure float:

\begin{figure*}[!b]
\begin{equation}
% equation
\end{equation}
\end{figure*}

However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the bottom
of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!

Sincerely,
Dan Kaplan

On 4/25/07, Helge Hafting [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Dan Kaplan wrote:
 Dear Lyx Users,

 I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines.
 So I'm
 making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is
 too long
 for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE
 has the
 equation move to the bottom of the page where it can span across both
 columns without breaking. It is further separated from the text by a
 horizontal line. How can I create this with LaTeX?
Use a figure float. (Or a table float or algorithm float if you prefer.)
The type of float only affects the caption.

A figure float may span both columns, and it can be set to appear at
the bottom of the page. It will be numbered too, and the number
can be used for automatic referencing.

Instead of an actual graphich, put your wide formula inside the float.
Take care so it doesn't accidentally get into the caption though.
You can remove the caption if you don't want it - although it is
generally useful to have.

Helge Hafting








Re: Long Equation

2007-04-26 Thread Dan Kaplan

Dear Lyx Users,

I tried the solution that Helge suggested, but its not working quite right.
I need to put a long equation at the bottom of a two column formatted paper.
LaTeX normally does not allow two-column-wide floats at the bottom, so I am
using the stfloats package to allow that.  Then I am using a figure float:

\begin{figure*}[!b]
\begin{equation}
% equation
\end{equation}
\end{figure*}

However, the float ALWAYS appears at the bottom of the NEXT page, even if
there are no other floats on the page where I call that float. Any idea
what's going wrong and how I can get the equation float to go at the bottom
of the page I want it to be on? Thanks!

Sincerely,
Dan Kaplan

On 4/25/07, Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


Dan Kaplan wrote:
> Dear Lyx Users,
>
> I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines.
> So I'm
> making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is
> too long
> for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE
> has the
> equation move to the bottom of the page where it can span across both
> columns without breaking. It is further separated from the text by a
> horizontal line. How can I create this with LaTeX?
Use a figure float. (Or a table float or algorithm float if you prefer.)
The type of float only affects the caption.

A figure float may span both columns, and it can be set to appear at
the bottom of the page. It will be numbered too, and the number
can be used for automatic referencing.

Instead of an actual graphich, put your wide formula inside the float.
Take care so it doesn't accidentally get into the caption though.
You can remove the caption if you don't want it - although it is
generally useful to have.

Helge Hafting








Re: Long Equation

2007-04-25 Thread Helge Hafting

Dan Kaplan wrote:

Dear Lyx Users,

I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines. 
So I'm
making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is 
too long
for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE 
has the

equation move to the bottom of the page where it can span across both
columns without breaking. It is further separated from the text by a
horizontal line. How can I create this with LaTeX?

Use a figure float. (Or a table float or algorithm float if you prefer.)
The type of float only affects the caption.

A figure float may span both columns, and it can be set to appear at
the bottom of the page. It will be numbered too, and the number
can be used for automatic referencing.

Instead of an actual graphich, put your wide formula inside the float.
Take care so it doesn't accidentally get into the caption though.
You can remove the caption if you don't want it - although it is
generally useful to have.

Helge Hafting







Re: Long Equation

2007-04-25 Thread Helge Hafting

Dan Kaplan wrote:

Dear Lyx Users,

I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines. 
So I'm
making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is 
too long
for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE 
has the

equation move to the bottom of the page where it can span across both
columns without breaking. It is further separated from the text by a
horizontal line. How can I create this with LaTeX?

Use a figure float. (Or a table float or algorithm float if you prefer.)
The type of float only affects the caption.

A figure float may span both columns, and it can be set to appear at
the bottom of the page. It will be numbered too, and the number
can be used for automatic referencing.

Instead of an actual graphich, put your wide formula inside the float.
Take care so it doesn't accidentally get into the caption though.
You can remove the caption if you don't want it - although it is
generally useful to have.

Helge Hafting







Re: Long Equation

2007-04-25 Thread Helge Hafting

Dan Kaplan wrote:

Dear Lyx Users,

I am writing an article and I want to follow IEEE format guidelines. 
So I'm
making my article two columns. However, I have an equation which is 
too long
for a single column. Rather than break the equation in two, the IEEE 
has the

equation move to the bottom of the page where it can span across both
columns without breaking. It is further separated from the text by a
horizontal line. How can I create this with LaTeX?

Use a figure float. (Or a table float or algorithm float if you prefer.)
The type of float only affects the caption.

A figure float may span both columns, and it can be set to appear at
the bottom of the page. It will be numbered too, and the number
can be used for automatic referencing.

Instead of an actual graphich, put your wide formula inside the float.
Take care so it doesn't accidentally get into the caption though.
You can remove the caption if you don't want it - although it is
generally useful to have.

Helge Hafting







Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Nirmal Govind

You need to put \sloppy in your preamble for Latex to wrap the long 
equation..  It might affect spacing at other places too but I haven't had a 
problem with this...

nirmal

At 08:05 AM 5/22/2002 -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
Hi,
When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as
postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going
until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx
automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?

Thanks.
Reuben D. Budiardja




Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Andre Poenitz

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
 When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as 
 postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going 
 until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug?

Yes.

 shouldn't lyx 
 automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?

No. It should add a scrollbar.

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Dekel Tsur

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
 Hi,
 When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as 
 postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going 
 until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx 
 automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?

Are you talking about an inline formula or display formula ?
Inline formulae are broken by latex, by only at binary operators or relation
symbols.
Display formulae are not broken by latex, so you need to break them manually.
See the section on multi-line formulae in the user's guide.



Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Herbert Voss

Reuben D Budiardja wrote:

 When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as 
 postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going 
 until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx 
 automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?


this is done by LaTeX and not LyX. have a look at


http://www.lyx.org/help/mathstuff/mathmode.php#break

Herbert




Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Nirmal Govind

You need to put \sloppy in your preamble for Latex to wrap the long 
equation..  It might affect spacing at other places too but I haven't had a 
problem with this...

nirmal

At 08:05 AM 5/22/2002 -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
Hi,
When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as
postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going
until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx
automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?

Thanks.
Reuben D. Budiardja




Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Andre Poenitz

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
 When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as 
 postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going 
 until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug?

Yes.

 shouldn't lyx 
 automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?

No. It should add a scrollbar.

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Dekel Tsur

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
 Hi,
 When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as 
 postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going 
 until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx 
 automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?

Are you talking about an inline formula or display formula ?
Inline formulae are broken by latex, by only at binary operators or relation
symbols.
Display formulae are not broken by latex, so you need to break them manually.
See the section on multi-line formulae in the user's guide.



Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Herbert Voss

Reuben D Budiardja wrote:

 When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as 
 postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going 
 until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx 
 automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?


this is done by LaTeX and not LyX. have a look at


http://www.lyx.org/help/mathstuff/mathmode.php#break

Herbert




Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Nirmal Govind

You need to put \sloppy in your preamble for Latex to wrap the long 
equation..  It might affect spacing at other places too but I haven't had a 
problem with this...

nirmal

At 08:05 AM 5/22/2002 -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
>Hi,
>When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as
>postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going
>until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx
>automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?
>
>Thanks.
>Reuben D. Budiardja




Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Andre Poenitz

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
> When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as 
> postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going 
> until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug?

Yes.

> shouldn't lyx 
> automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?

No. It should add a scrollbar.

Andre'

-- 
Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security,
will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)



Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Dekel Tsur

On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:05:29AM -0500, Reuben D Budiardja wrote:
> Hi,
> When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as 
> postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going 
> until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx 
> automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?

Are you talking about an inline formula or display formula ?
Inline formulae are broken by latex, by only at binary operators or relation
symbols.
Display formulae are not broken by latex, so you need to break them manually.
See the section on multi-line formulae in the user's guide.



Re: Long equation got cut off

2002-05-22 Thread Herbert Voss

Reuben D Budiardja wrote:

> When inputting a very long equation in lyx, and then display it as 
> postscript, I see that lyx did not wrap the equation, and just keep going 
> until it got cut off by the page margin. Is this a bug? shouldn't lyx 
> automatically wrap a long equation, as it wraps words?


this is done by LaTeX and not LyX. have a look at


http://www.lyx.org/help/mathstuff/mathmode.php#break

Herbert




Re: long equation

2002-04-04 Thread Herbert Voss

Matias Freytes wrote:

 On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
 
 
Matias Freytes wrote:


 I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?

as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.

 
 I have an IEEE JSAC paper from November/2000 and the author uses
 this long equations. Anyway, I'd like to know if there's a way to
 do this.


sure, when the IEEE.cls supports it. Have a look into
this class file. There should be a description

HErbert


-- 
http://www.lyx.org/help/




Re: long equation

2002-04-04 Thread Bruce Veidt

Herbert Voss wrote:
 
 Matias Freytes wrote:
 
I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
  write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
  both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?
 
 as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.

That is correct; long equations are broken onto several lines.
I do this by hand using the equation array.

Bruce
-- 
Bruce Veidt 
National Research Council   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Box 248 (250)493-2277
Penticton, BC  V2A 6K3  fax: 493-7767
Canada

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



Re: long equation

2002-04-04 Thread Herbert Voss

Matias Freytes wrote:

 On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
 
 
Matias Freytes wrote:


 I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?

as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.

 
 I have an IEEE JSAC paper from November/2000 and the author uses
 this long equations. Anyway, I'd like to know if there's a way to
 do this.


sure, when the IEEE.cls supports it. Have a look into
this class file. There should be a description

HErbert


-- 
http://www.lyx.org/help/




Re: long equation

2002-04-04 Thread Bruce Veidt

Herbert Voss wrote:
 
 Matias Freytes wrote:
 
I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
  write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
  both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?
 
 as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.

That is correct; long equations are broken onto several lines.
I do this by hand using the equation array.

Bruce
-- 
Bruce Veidt 
National Research Council   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Box 248 (250)493-2277
Penticton, BC  V2A 6K3  fax: 493-7767
Canada

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



Re: long equation

2002-04-04 Thread Herbert Voss

Matias Freytes wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Apr 2002, Herbert Voss wrote:
> 
> 
>>Matias Freytes wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
>>>write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
>>>both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?
>>>
>>as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.
>>
> 
> I have an IEEE JSAC paper from November/2000 and the author uses
> this long equations. Anyway, I'd like to know if there's a way to
> do this.


sure, when the IEEE.cls supports it. Have a look into
this class file. There should be a description

HErbert


-- 
http://www.lyx.org/help/




Re: long equation

2002-04-04 Thread Bruce Veidt

Herbert Voss wrote:
> 
> Matias Freytes wrote:
> 
> >   I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
> > write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
> > both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?
> 
> as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.

That is correct; long equations are broken onto several lines.
I do this by hand using the equation array.

Bruce
-- 
Bruce Veidt 
National Research Council   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Box 248 (250)493-2277
Penticton, BC  V2A 6K3  fax: 493-7767
Canada

Please avoid sending me Word or PowerPoint attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html



Re: long equation

2002-04-03 Thread Herbert Voss

Matias Freytes wrote:

   I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
 write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
 both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?


as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.

Herbert


-- 
http://www.lyx.org/help/




Re: long equation

2002-04-03 Thread Herbert Voss

Matias Freytes wrote:

   I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
 write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
 both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?


as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.

Herbert


-- 
http://www.lyx.org/help/




Re: long equation

2002-04-03 Thread Herbert Voss

Matias Freytes wrote:

>   I'm writing a IEEE Tran paper (twocolumn) and need to
> write a very long equation, but I can't force Latex/Lyx to use
> both columns for it. Is there any way to do this?


as far as I know, IEEE org doesn't accept this.

Herbert


-- 
http://www.lyx.org/help/