Re: [LyX 2.1/Win7] lyx --help not responding

[Jannick]

Problem remains after update to LyX 2.1.1.

Re: [LyX 2.1/Win7] lyx --help not responding

[Jannick]

Problem remains after update to LyX 2.1.1.

Re: [LyX 2.1/Win7] lyx --help not responding

[Jannick]

Problem remains after update to LyX 2.1.1.

Re: lyx 2.1 subscript and superscript problem

[Csikos Bela]

Csikos Bela bcsikos...@freemail.hu írta:

In lyx 2.1 I can not make subscript and superscript work.

In a new file (every setting is default) I type A2, highlight 2, select 
Insert-Formatting-
Superscript (or Subscript) - View document (pdflatex): the character 2 is not 
subscript
or superscript, it is a normal inline character.

In the editor window it is sub- or superscript. In the source pane there is no 
indication of
any sub or superscript command, it is simply A2.

It was something in the lyx preferences (~/.lyx) folder.
Recreating it solved the problem.

bcsikos

Re: lyx 2.1 subscript and superscript problem

[Csikos Bela]

Csikos Bela bcsikos...@freemail.hu írta:

In lyx 2.1 I can not make subscript and superscript work.

In a new file (every setting is default) I type A2, highlight 2, select 
Insert-Formatting-
Superscript (or Subscript) - View document (pdflatex): the character 2 is not 
subscript
or superscript, it is a normal inline character.

In the editor window it is sub- or superscript. In the source pane there is no 
indication of
any sub or superscript command, it is simply A2.

It was something in the lyx preferences (~/.lyx) folder.
Recreating it solved the problem.

bcsikos

Re: lyx 2.1 subscript and superscript problem

[Csikos Bela]

Csikos Bela  írta:

>In lyx 2.1 I can not make subscript and superscript work.
>
>In a new file (every setting is default) I type A2, highlight 2, select 
>Insert->Formatting->
>Superscript (or Subscript) -> View document (pdflatex): the character 2 is not 
>subscript
>or superscript, it is a normal inline character.
>
>In the editor window it is sub- or superscript. In the source pane there is no 
>indication of
>any sub or superscript command, it is simply A2.

It was something in the lyx preferences (~/.lyx) folder.
Recreating it solved the problem.

bcsikos

Re: Lyx 2.1 in Debian

[Richard Heck]

On 05/07/2014 12:21 PM, Corrado Mencar wrote:

Dear Lyx users,
   I recently passed to Debian (wheezy - testing) from a Ubuntu 
machine where I installed Lyx 2.1. To my great surprise, I found that 
the current Lyx version supported in Debian is v2.0.6 because the 
package seems no more maintained since last summer (see 
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lyx.html).
   Unfortunately, as you may know, Lyx 2.1 generates lyx files that 
are incompatible with Lyx 2.0.6. There is the export function but it 
is not convenient when you work collaboratively with peers that use 
Lyx 2.1 (that is my case).


If you wish, you can download the lyx2lyx conversion files from 
http://tinyurl.com/pjxcbfg and replace the ones you currently have 
installed. Then 2.0.6 can read 2.1 files. But there will be a back and 
forth conversion that may make this less than ideal


   Apart from asking colleagues to downgrade to Lyx 2.0.x (with 
subsequent complaints) is there any workaround to install Lyx 2.1 in 
Debian?


Of course: Compile it yourself. This is not hard to do.

Richard

Re: Lyx 2.1 in Debian

[Richard Heck]

On 05/07/2014 12:21 PM, Corrado Mencar wrote:

Dear Lyx users,
   I recently passed to Debian (wheezy - testing) from a Ubuntu 
machine where I installed Lyx 2.1. To my great surprise, I found that 
the current Lyx version supported in Debian is v2.0.6 because the 
package seems no more maintained since last summer (see 
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lyx.html).
   Unfortunately, as you may know, Lyx 2.1 generates lyx files that 
are incompatible with Lyx 2.0.6. There is the export function but it 
is not convenient when you work collaboratively with peers that use 
Lyx 2.1 (that is my case).


If you wish, you can download the lyx2lyx conversion files from 
http://tinyurl.com/pjxcbfg and replace the ones you currently have 
installed. Then 2.0.6 can read 2.1 files. But there will be a back and 
forth conversion that may make this less than ideal


   Apart from asking colleagues to downgrade to Lyx 2.0.x (with 
subsequent complaints) is there any workaround to install Lyx 2.1 in 
Debian?


Of course: Compile it yourself. This is not hard to do.

Richard

Re: Lyx 2.1 in Debian

[Richard Heck]

On 05/07/2014 12:21 PM, Corrado Mencar wrote:

Dear Lyx users,
   I recently passed to Debian (wheezy - testing) from a Ubuntu 
machine where I installed Lyx 2.1. To my great surprise, I found that 
the current Lyx version supported in Debian is v2.0.6 because the 
package seems no more maintained since last summer (see 
http://packages.qa.debian.org/l/lyx.html).
   Unfortunately, as you may know, Lyx 2.1 generates lyx files that 
are incompatible with Lyx 2.0.6. There is the export function but it 
is not convenient when you work collaboratively with peers that use 
Lyx 2.1 (that is my case).


If you wish, you can download the lyx2lyx conversion files from 
http://tinyurl.com/pjxcbfg and replace the ones you currently have 
installed. Then 2.0.6 can read 2.1 files. But there will be a back and 
forth conversion that may make this less than ideal


   Apart from asking colleagues to downgrade to Lyx 2.0.x (with 
subsequent complaints) is there any workaround to install Lyx 2.1 in 
Debian?


Of course: Compile it yourself. This is not hard to do.

Richard

Re: lyx 2.1

[Sean Patrick Burke]

On Apr 30, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I just installed the nex lyx package
 3.13.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 14 20:34:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 
 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
 And I try to compile my document,
 
 and I get:
 
 \usepackage
   [T1]{fontenc}
 The control sequence at the end of the top line
 of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
 misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
 spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
 and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
 
 What is wrong?
 with the previous version it was OK.
 

I’ve run into this when trying to import LyX 2.0 into LyX 2.1. Try copying and 
pasting the old document into a new document. 



sean




 thank
 
 
 ===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
 ===

Re: lyx 2.1

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2014-04-30 14:50 GMT+02:00 Sean Patrick Burke:

  I just installed the nex lyx package
  3.13.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 14 20:34:16 UTC 2014 x86_64
 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
  And I try to compile my document,
 
  and I get:
 
  \usepackage
[T1]{fontenc}
  The control sequence at the end of the top line
  of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
  misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
  spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
  and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
 
  What is wrong?
  with the previous version it was OK.
 

 I’ve run into this when trying to import LyX 2.0 into LyX 2.1. Try copying
 and pasting the old document into a new document.


This is a bad workaround (and you lose all document settings).

Could one of you provide us with a test case?

Jürgen

Re: lyx 2.1

[Patrick Dupre]

Thank,

I found the issue,
there was a \use_default_options false
in the documentclass custom setting.


 - Original Message -
 From: Jürgen Spitzmüller
 Sent: 04/30/14 03:20 PM
 To: Sean Patrick Burke
 Subject: Re: lyx 2.1
 
 2014-04-30 14:50 GMT+02:00 Sean Patrick Burke:
 
   I just installed the nex lyx package
   3.13.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 14 20:34:16 UTC 2014 x86_64
  x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
   And I try to compile my document,
  
   and I get:
  
   \usepackage
   [T1]{fontenc}
   The control sequence at the end of the top line
   of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
   misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
   spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
   and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
  
   What is wrong?
   with the previous version it was OK.
  
 
  I’ve run into this when trying to import LyX 2.0 into LyX 2.1. Try copying
  and pasting the old document into a new document.
 
 
 This is a bad workaround (and you lose all document settings).
 
 Could one of you provide us with a test case?
 
 Jürgen


===
 Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale           | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12                   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann                 | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===

Re: lyx 2.1

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2014-04-30 16:19 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre:

 Thank,

 I found the issue,
 there was a \use_default_options false
 in the documentclass custom setting.


Yes, but how did it end up there?

Jürgen

Re: lyx 2.1

[Patrick Dupre]

 - Original Message -
 From: Jürgen Spitzmüller
 Sent: 04/30/14 04:21 PM
 To: Patrick Dupre
 Subject: Re: lyx 2.1
 
 2014-04-30 16:19 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre:
 
  Thank,
 
  I found the issue,
  there was a \use_default_options false
  in the documentclass custom setting.
 
 
 Yes, but how did it end up there?
 
Yes, it is what I had to remove in the lyx document class settings.
By the way, I have other issues.

See next message.

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale           | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12                   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann                 | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===

Re: lyx 2.1

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2014-04-30 16:29 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre:

  Yes, but how did it end up there?
 
 Yes, it is what I had to remove in the lyx document class settings.


Let me rephrase my question: Do you have an idea how this wrong string came
into the document settings? Did it happen in the conversion process of a
LyX 2.0 file? If so, can you reproduce the problem and provide us with the
LyX 2.0 file?

Jürgen

Re: lyx 2.1

[Sean Patrick Burke]

On Apr 30, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Patrick Dupre pdu...@gmx.com wrote:

 Hello,
 
 I just installed the nex lyx package
 3.13.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 14 20:34:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 
 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
 And I try to compile my document,
 
 and I get:
 
 \usepackage
   [T1]{fontenc}
 The control sequence at the end of the top line
 of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
 misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
 spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
 and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
 
 What is wrong?
 with the previous version it was OK.
 

I’ve run into this when trying to import LyX 2.0 into LyX 2.1. Try copying and 
pasting the old document into a new document. 



sean




 thank
 
 
 ===
 Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
 ===

Re: lyx 2.1

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2014-04-30 14:50 GMT+02:00 Sean Patrick Burke:

  I just installed the nex lyx package
  3.13.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 14 20:34:16 UTC 2014 x86_64
 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
 
  And I try to compile my document,
 
  and I get:
 
  \usepackage
[T1]{fontenc}
  The control sequence at the end of the top line
  of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
  misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
  spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
  and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
 
  What is wrong?
  with the previous version it was OK.
 

 I’ve run into this when trying to import LyX 2.0 into LyX 2.1. Try copying
 and pasting the old document into a new document.


This is a bad workaround (and you lose all document settings).

Could one of you provide us with a test case?

Jürgen

Re: lyx 2.1

[Patrick Dupre]

Thank,

I found the issue,
there was a \use_default_options false
in the documentclass custom setting.


 - Original Message -
 From: Jürgen Spitzmüller
 Sent: 04/30/14 03:20 PM
 To: Sean Patrick Burke
 Subject: Re: lyx 2.1
 
 2014-04-30 14:50 GMT+02:00 Sean Patrick Burke:
 
   I just installed the nex lyx package
   3.13.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 14 20:34:16 UTC 2014 x86_64
  x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
  
   And I try to compile my document,
  
   and I get:
  
   \usepackage
   [T1]{fontenc}
   The control sequence at the end of the top line
   of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
   misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
   spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
   and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
  
   What is wrong?
   with the previous version it was OK.
  
 
  I’ve run into this when trying to import LyX 2.0 into LyX 2.1. Try copying
  and pasting the old document into a new document.
 
 
 This is a bad workaround (and you lose all document settings).
 
 Could one of you provide us with a test case?
 
 Jürgen


===
 Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale           | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12                   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann                 | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===

Re: lyx 2.1

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2014-04-30 16:19 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre:

 Thank,

 I found the issue,
 there was a \use_default_options false
 in the documentclass custom setting.


Yes, but how did it end up there?

Jürgen

Re: lyx 2.1

[Patrick Dupre]

 - Original Message -
 From: Jürgen Spitzmüller
 Sent: 04/30/14 04:21 PM
 To: Patrick Dupre
 Subject: Re: lyx 2.1
 
 2014-04-30 16:19 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre:
 
  Thank,
 
  I found the issue,
  there was a \use_default_options false
  in the documentclass custom setting.
 
 
 Yes, but how did it end up there?
 
Yes, it is what I had to remove in the lyx document class settings.
By the way, I have other issues.

See next message.

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale           | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12                   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann                 | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===

Re: lyx 2.1

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2014-04-30 16:29 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre:

  Yes, but how did it end up there?
 
 Yes, it is what I had to remove in the lyx document class settings.


Let me rephrase my question: Do you have an idea how this wrong string came
into the document settings? Did it happen in the conversion process of a
LyX 2.0 file? If so, can you reproduce the problem and provide us with the
LyX 2.0 file?

Jürgen

Re: lyx 2.1

[Sean Patrick Burke]

On Apr 30, 2014, at 8:35 AM, Patrick Dupre  wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I just installed the nex lyx package
> 3.13.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 14 20:34:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 x86_64 
> x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> And I try to compile my document,
> 
> and I get:
> 
> \usepackage
>   [T1]{fontenc}
> The control sequence at the end of the top line
> of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
> misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
> spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
> and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
> 
> What is wrong?
> with the previous version it was OK.
> 

I’ve run into this when trying to import LyX 2.0 into LyX 2.1. Try copying and 
pasting the old document into a new document. 



sean




> thank
> 
> 
> ===
> Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
> Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
> Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale   | |
> Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
> 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
> ===

Re: lyx 2.1

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2014-04-30 14:50 GMT+02:00 Sean Patrick Burke:

> > I just installed the nex lyx package
> > 3.13.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 14 20:34:16 UTC 2014 x86_64
> x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >
> > And I try to compile my document,
> >
> > and I get:
> >
> > \usepackage
> >   [T1]{fontenc}
> > The control sequence at the end of the top line
> > of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
> > misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
> > spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
> > and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
> >
> > What is wrong?
> > with the previous version it was OK.
> >
>
> I’ve run into this when trying to import LyX 2.0 into LyX 2.1. Try copying
> and pasting the old document into a new document.
>

This is a bad workaround (and you lose all document settings).

Could one of you provide us with a test case?

Jürgen

Re: lyx 2.1

[Patrick Dupre]

Thank,

I found the issue,
there was a \use_default_options false
in the documentclass custom setting.


> - Original Message -
> From: Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Sent: 04/30/14 03:20 PM
> To: Sean Patrick Burke
> Subject: Re: lyx 2.1
> 
> 2014-04-30 14:50 GMT+02:00 Sean Patrick Burke:
> 
> > > I just installed the nex lyx package
> > > 3.13.10-200.fc20.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Apr 14 20:34:16 UTC 2014 x86_64
> > x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > And I try to compile my document,
> > >
> > > and I get:
> > >
> > > \usepackage
> > > [T1]{fontenc}
> > > The control sequence at the end of the top line
> > > of your error message was never \def'ed. If you have
> > > misspelled it (e.g., `\hobx'), type `I' and the correct
> > > spelling (e.g., `I\hbox'). Otherwise just continue,
> > > and I'll forget about whatever was undefined.
> > >
> > > What is wrong?
> > > with the previous version it was OK.
> > >
> >
> > I’ve run into this when trying to import LyX 2.0 into LyX 2.1. Try copying
> > and pasting the old document into a new document.
> >
> 
> This is a bad workaround (and you lose all document settings).
> 
> Could one of you provide us with a test case?
> 
> Jürgen


===
 Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale           | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12                   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann                 | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===

Re: lyx 2.1

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2014-04-30 16:19 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre:

> Thank,
>
> I found the issue,
> there was a \use_default_options false
> in the documentclass custom setting.
>

Yes, but how did it end up there?

Jürgen

Re: lyx 2.1

[Patrick Dupre]

> - Original Message -
> From: Jürgen Spitzmüller
> Sent: 04/30/14 04:21 PM
> To: Patrick Dupre
> Subject: Re: lyx 2.1
> 
> 2014-04-30 16:19 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre:
> 
> > Thank,
> >
> > I found the issue,
> > there was a \use_default_options false
> > in the documentclass custom setting.
> >
> 
> Yes, but how did it end up there?
> 
Yes, it is what I had to remove in the lyx document class settings.
By the way, I have other issues.

See next message.

===
 Patrick DUPRÉ                                 | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
 Laboratoire de Physico-Chimie de l'Atmosphère | |
 Université du Littoral-Côte d'Opale           | |
 Tel.  (33)-(0)3 28 23 76 12                   | | Fax: 03 28 65 82 44
 189A, avenue Maurice Schumann                 | | 59140 Dunkerque, France
===

Re: lyx 2.1

[Jürgen Spitzmüller]

2014-04-30 16:29 GMT+02:00 Patrick Dupre:

> > Yes, but how did it end up there?
> >
> Yes, it is what I had to remove in the lyx document class settings.
>

Let me rephrase my question: Do you have an idea how this wrong string came
into the document settings? Did it happen in the conversion process of a
LyX 2.0 file? If so, can you reproduce the problem and provide us with the
LyX 2.0 file?

Jürgen

Re: Lyx 2.1 RC1, warning message the selected document class Article requires external files

[Rahayu]

The error message looked for cls file.
I guess it is because the installer bundle only offers basic setup of
Miktek, therefore most of document classes are not available.

Use complete installation of Miktek might fix the problem.

Regards,

Hayu


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:

 On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi n...@12000.org wrote:
  fyi;
 
  I posted this here
 
 
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22807934/lyx-2-1-rc1-warning-message-the-selected-document-class-article-requires-exte
 
  and it was suggested to send email to this mailing list as FYI.
 
  Information about the problem in the above link.
  Basically, I downloaded LyX-210RC1-Bundle-1.exe  on windows 7, 64
  bit, and after installation, I keep getting the above error.

 Hi Nasser,

 Thanks for sending feedback. I wonder if this related to this bug:
 http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8570
 You could try the installer linked to there, although note that it is
 not official and should only be used for testing.

 Best,

 Scott

Re: Lyx 2.1 RC1, warning message the selected document class Article requires external files

[Rahayu]

The error message looked for cls file.
I guess it is because the installer bundle only offers basic setup of
Miktek, therefore most of document classes are not available.

Use complete installation of Miktek might fix the problem.

Regards,

Hayu


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak skost...@lyx.org wrote:

 On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi n...@12000.org wrote:
  fyi;
 
  I posted this here
 
 
 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22807934/lyx-2-1-rc1-warning-message-the-selected-document-class-article-requires-exte
 
  and it was suggested to send email to this mailing list as FYI.
 
  Information about the problem in the above link.
  Basically, I downloaded LyX-210RC1-Bundle-1.exe  on windows 7, 64
  bit, and after installation, I keep getting the above error.

 Hi Nasser,

 Thanks for sending feedback. I wonder if this related to this bug:
 http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8570
 You could try the installer linked to there, although note that it is
 not official and should only be used for testing.

 Best,

 Scott

Re: Lyx 2.1 RC1, warning message "the selected document class Article" requires external files

[Rahayu]

The error message looked for cls file.
I guess it is because the installer bundle only offers basic setup of
Miktek, therefore most of document classes are not available.

Use complete installation of Miktek might fix the problem.

Regards,

Hayu


On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:41 PM, Scott Kostyshak  wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi  wrote:
> > fyi;
> >
> > I posted this here
> >
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22807934/lyx-2-1-rc1-warning-message-the-selected-document-class-article-requires-exte
> >
> > and it was suggested to send email to this mailing list as FYI.
> >
> > Information about the problem in the above link.
> > Basically, I downloaded LyX-210RC1-Bundle-1.exe  on windows 7, 64
> > bit, and after installation, I keep getting the above error.
>
> Hi Nasser,
>
> Thanks for sending feedback. I wonder if this related to this bug:
> http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8570
> You could try the installer linked to there, although note that it is
> not official and should only be used for testing.
>
> Best,
>
> Scott
>

Re: Lyx 2.1 RC1, warning message the selected document class Article requires external files

[Scott Kostyshak]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi n...@12000.org wrote:
 fyi;

 I posted this here

 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22807934/lyx-2-1-rc1-warning-message-the-selected-document-class-article-requires-exte

 and it was suggested to send email to this mailing list as FYI.

 Information about the problem in the above link.
 Basically, I downloaded LyX-210RC1-Bundle-1.exe  on windows 7, 64
 bit, and after installation, I keep getting the above error.

Hi Nasser,

Thanks for sending feedback. I wonder if this related to this bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8570
You could try the installer linked to there, although note that it is
not official and should only be used for testing.

Best,

Scott

Re: Lyx 2.1 RC1, warning message the selected document class Article requires external files

[Scott Kostyshak]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi n...@12000.org wrote:
 fyi;

 I posted this here

 http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22807934/lyx-2-1-rc1-warning-message-the-selected-document-class-article-requires-exte

 and it was suggested to send email to this mailing list as FYI.

 Information about the problem in the above link.
 Basically, I downloaded LyX-210RC1-Bundle-1.exe  on windows 7, 64
 bit, and after installation, I keep getting the above error.

Hi Nasser,

Thanks for sending feedback. I wonder if this related to this bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8570
You could try the installer linked to there, although note that it is
not official and should only be used for testing.

Best,

Scott

Re: Lyx 2.1 RC1, warning message "the selected document class Article" requires external files

[Scott Kostyshak]

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Nasser M. Abbasi  wrote:
> fyi;
>
> I posted this here
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/22807934/lyx-2-1-rc1-warning-message-the-selected-document-class-article-requires-exte
>
> and it was suggested to send email to this mailing list as FYI.
>
> Information about the problem in the above link.
> Basically, I downloaded LyX-210RC1-Bundle-1.exe  on windows 7, 64
> bit, and after installation, I keep getting the above error.

Hi Nasser,

Thanks for sending feedback. I wonder if this related to this bug:
http://www.lyx.org/trac/ticket/8570
You could try the installer linked to there, although note that it is
not official and should only be used for testing.

Best,

Scott

Re: Lyx 2.1 Beta 2 and 32bit Mac

[Stephan Witt]

Am 03.02.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Dominik Schmidt p...@do-s.de:

 Hi 
 
 has the support for 32 Bit Mac machines been dropped? I am running a Core Duo 
 with Snow Leopard and the system refuses to install the latest beta.

Hi, there is no plan to drop 32 bit support. But 64 bit is most common these 
days. I'll build it with 32 bit libraries - if possible…

Stephan

Re: Lyx 2.1 Beta 2 and 32bit Mac

[Dominik Schmidt]

I would really appreciate that! I am hoping 2.1 solves another issue I have
with Lyx so I kind of depend on it.


2014-02-05 Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net:

 Am 03.02.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Dominik Schmidt p...@do-s.de:

  Hi
 
  has the support for 32 Bit Mac machines been dropped? I am running a
 Core Duo with Snow Leopard and the system refuses to install the latest
 beta.

 Hi, there is no plan to drop 32 bit support. But 64 bit is most common
 these days. I'll build it with 32 bit libraries - if possible...

 Stephan

Re: Lyx 2.1 Beta 2 and 32bit Mac

[Stephan Witt]

Am 03.02.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Dominik Schmidt p...@do-s.de:

 Hi 
 
 has the support for 32 Bit Mac machines been dropped? I am running a Core Duo 
 with Snow Leopard and the system refuses to install the latest beta.

Hi, there is no plan to drop 32 bit support. But 64 bit is most common these 
days. I'll build it with 32 bit libraries - if possible…

Stephan

Re: Lyx 2.1 Beta 2 and 32bit Mac

[Dominik Schmidt]

I would really appreciate that! I am hoping 2.1 solves another issue I have
with Lyx so I kind of depend on it.


2014-02-05 Stephan Witt st.w...@gmx.net:

 Am 03.02.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Dominik Schmidt p...@do-s.de:

  Hi
 
  has the support for 32 Bit Mac machines been dropped? I am running a
 Core Duo with Snow Leopard and the system refuses to install the latest
 beta.

 Hi, there is no plan to drop 32 bit support. But 64 bit is most common
 these days. I'll build it with 32 bit libraries - if possible...

 Stephan

Re: Lyx 2.1 Beta 2 and 32bit Mac

[Stephan Witt]

Am 03.02.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Dominik Schmidt :

> Hi 
> 
> has the support for 32 Bit Mac machines been dropped? I am running a Core Duo 
> with Snow Leopard and the system refuses to install the latest beta.

Hi, there is no plan to drop 32 bit support. But 64 bit is most common these 
days. I'll build it with 32 bit libraries - if possible…

Stephan

Re: Lyx 2.1 Beta 2 and 32bit Mac

[Dominik Schmidt]

I would really appreciate that! I am hoping 2.1 solves another issue I have
with Lyx so I kind of depend on it.


2014-02-05 Stephan Witt :

> Am 03.02.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Dominik Schmidt :
>
> > Hi
> >
> > has the support for 32 Bit Mac machines been dropped? I am running a
> Core Duo with Snow Leopard and the system refuses to install the latest
> beta.
>
> Hi, there is no plan to drop 32 bit support. But 64 bit is most common
> these days. I'll build it with 32 bit libraries - if possible...
>
> Stephan

Re: LyX 2.1 Manuals. Changes in menus

[Uwe Stöhr]

Am 04.07.2013 19:01, schrieb Ignacio García:


there have been some changes in menus from version 2.0 to version 2.1:


Thanks Ignacio for the list. I am aware of these changes but as we did not release a beta version 
the menu names were not stable so that I did no yet started to update the docs in this respect.


Now we have a beta version put but I will go to vacation.

regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.1 Manuals. Changes in menus

[Uwe Stöhr]

Am 04.07.2013 19:01, schrieb Ignacio García:


there have been some changes in menus from version 2.0 to version 2.1:


Thanks Ignacio for the list. I am aware of these changes but as we did not release a beta version 
the menu names were not stable so that I did no yet started to update the docs in this respect.


Now we have a beta version put but I will go to vacation.

regards Uwe

Re: LyX 2.1 Manuals. Changes in menus

[Uwe Stöhr]

Am 04.07.2013 19:01, schrieb Ignacio García:


there have been some changes in menus from version 2.0 to version 2.1:


Thanks Ignacio for the list. I am aware of these changes but as we did not release a beta version 
the menu names were not stable so that I did no yet started to update the docs in this respect.


Now we have a beta version put but I will go to vacation.

regards Uwe