Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
Geord, Scott and Kornel, thanks for the infos re uninstall! Wolfgang On 31.05.2016 23:05, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) side by side You're on Linux right? I'm not sure of the best way to remove it. We don't have an uninstall target (i.e. you can't do "make uninstall"). We do (at least with autotools). Simply call make uninstall from the rc1 build directory. If installation needed root privileges, then this needs root privileges as well. Good to know. Sorry for the misinformation, Wolfgang. I based my answer on the targets created by cmake. But with cmake we can use packages. Uninstalling is just as easy as using 'dpkg --purge' or 'rpm -e'. Scott Georg Kornel
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:05:59PM +0200, Kornel Benko wrote: > Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > >> > > > >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx > > > >> lyx22) > > > >> side by side > > > > > > > > You're on Linux right? I'm not sure of the best way to remove it. We > > > > don't have an uninstall target (i.e. you can't do "make uninstall"). > > > > > > We do (at least with autotools). Simply call > > > > > > make uninstall > > > > > > from the rc1 build directory. If installation needed root privileges, > > > then > > > this needs root privileges as well. > > > > Good to know. Sorry for the misinformation, Wolfgang. I based my answer > > on the targets created by cmake. > > But with cmake we can use packages. Uninstalling is just as easy as using > 'dpkg --purge' or 'rpm -e'. That is indeed good to know. I was blaming myself, not cmake. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 16:09:26, schrieb Scott Kostyshak > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > >> > > >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) > > >> side by side > > > > > > You're on Linux right? I'm not sure of the best way to remove it. We > > > don't have an uninstall target (i.e. you can't do "make uninstall"). > > > > We do (at least with autotools). Simply call > > > > make uninstall > > > > from the rc1 build directory. If installation needed root privileges, then > > this needs root privileges as well. > > Good to know. Sorry for the misinformation, Wolfgang. I based my answer > on the targets created by cmake. But with cmake we can use packages. Uninstalling is just as easy as using 'dpkg --purge' or 'rpm -e'. > Scott > > > > > > > Georg Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:38:17PM +0200, Georg Baum wrote: > Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > >> > >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) > >> side by side > > > > You're on Linux right? I'm not sure of the best way to remove it. We > > don't have an uninstall target (i.e. you can't do "make uninstall"). > > We do (at least with autotools). Simply call > > make uninstall > > from the rc1 build directory. If installation needed root privileges, then > this needs root privileges as well. Good to know. Sorry for the misinformation, Wolfgang. I based my answer on the targets created by cmake. Scott > > > Georg > signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
Scott Kostyshak wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: >> >> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) >> side by side > > You're on Linux right? I'm not sure of the best way to remove it. We > don't have an uninstall target (i.e. you can't do "make uninstall"). We do (at least with autotools). Simply call make uninstall from the rc1 build directory. If installation needed root privileges, then this needs root privileges as well. Georg
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On 31.05.2016 11:35, Helge Hafting wrote: Den 31. mai 2016 10:50, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22 and make and #make install so probably neither one Wolfgang Removing rc1 is not necessary for correct operation of lyx 2.2.0 in this case. The rc1 lyx you compiled is named "lyx-22", and won't interfere with the packaged lyx named "lyx". You may of course still want to remove the older lyx-22 to save space or have a tidy filesystem. The binaries: rm /usr/local/lyx-22* (removes lyx-22 and lyxclient-22. You must be root or use sudo to do this) Other lyx files: rm -r /usr/local/share/lyx-22 (removes everything else, templates, scripts, document classes and so on. You must be root for this too.) Check if there is anything else left: find /usr/local/ -name "lyx-22*" If anything is found, consider removing it. If it has "-22" in the name, it is only needed for lyx-22 and should be of little use for anything else. Personal lyx-22 rc1 stuff: rm -r ~/.lyx-22 (removes settings, customizations and personal templates for this particular lyx. If you have saved anything in here, such as your own templates or document classes, then you may want to copy it into the new .lyx/ folder first. ) The distro package system installs lyx stuff in /usr/share/lyx/, which is a different folder from those used by lyx-22. The distributed binaries should be /usr/bin/lyx and /usr/bin/lyxclient, and the personal folder for settings etc. is ~/.lyx/ A lyx you install with "make install" goes in /usr/local/... so it won't interfere with anything from the package management system of the linux distribution. And when you use "--with-version-suffix=22", everything will be tagged with that convenient "-22". This makes removal easier, and allows installation of many versions of lyx simultaneously, which is useful for testing & development. All different versions should use different version-suffix. Helge Hafting Thanks, Helge, for explaining all this in detail which is very helpful for me, especially the various places for lyx. As far as my question re ngerman is concerned, I noticed that the summary is also in German, which explains that it is needed.
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
Den 31. mai 2016 10:50, skrev Wolfgang Engelmann: I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22 and make and #make install so probably neither one Wolfgang Removing rc1 is not necessary for correct operation of lyx 2.2.0 in this case. The rc1 lyx you compiled is named "lyx-22", and won't interfere with the packaged lyx named "lyx". You may of course still want to remove the older lyx-22 to save space or have a tidy filesystem. The binaries: rm /usr/local/lyx-22* (removes lyx-22 and lyxclient-22. You must be root or use sudo to do this) Other lyx files: rm -r /usr/local/share/lyx-22 (removes everything else, templates, scripts, document classes and so on. You must be root for this too.) Check if there is anything else left: find /usr/local/ -name "lyx-22*" If anything is found, consider removing it. If it has "-22" in the name, it is only needed for lyx-22 and should be of little use for anything else. Personal lyx-22 rc1 stuff: rm -r ~/.lyx-22 (removes settings, customizations and personal templates for this particular lyx. If you have saved anything in here, such as your own templates or document classes, then you may want to copy it into the new .lyx/ folder first. ) The distro package system installs lyx stuff in /usr/share/lyx/, which is a different folder from those used by lyx-22. The distributed binaries should be /usr/bin/lyx and /usr/bin/lyxclient, and the personal folder for settings etc. is ~/.lyx/ A lyx you install with "make install" goes in /usr/local/... so it won't interfere with anything from the package management system of the linux distribution. And when you use "--with-version-suffix=22", everything will be tagged with that convenient "-22". This makes removal easier, and allows installation of many versions of lyx simultaneously, which is useful for testing & development. All different versions should use different version-suffix. Helge Hafting
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:50:38, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann > >> I compiled it from source > > With cmake or automake help? > > In case you used cmake, you could create a debian package. Installing and > > de-installing is easy in that case. > > > > Kornel > I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22 This is automake. > and make > and #make install > so probably neither one > Wolfgang Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On 31.05.2016 10:27, Kornel Benko wrote: Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:15:32, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? Wolfgang No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final 2.2.0 over rc1. Scott Thanks, Scott. How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) side by side How did you install them? What OS? Liviu Wolfgang Liviu, Scott: Kubuntu (14.04 trusty) and using Lyx2.2.0 (of 23.5.2016) Debian (GNU/Linux 8.4 (jessie) Release: 8.4) and using Lyx2.2.0 (of 23.5.2016) Wolfgang ps I compiled it from source With cmake or automake help? In case you used cmake, you could create a debian package. Installing and de-installing is easy in that case. Kornel I used ./configure --with-version-suffix=22 and make and #make install so probably neither one Wolfgang
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
Am Dienstag, 31. Mai 2016 um 10:15:32, schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann > > On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > > > > On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: > >> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann > >> wrote: > >>> > >>> On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > >>> > >>> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > >>> > >>> Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > >>> Wolfgang > >>> > >>> No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the > >>> final > >>> 2.2.0 over rc1. > >>> > >>> Scott > >>> > >>> Thanks, Scott. > >>> > >>> How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx > >>> lyx22) > >>> side by side > >>> > >> How did you install them? What OS? > >> > >> > >> Liviu > >> > >>> Wolfgang > >> > >> > > Liviu, Scott: > > > > Kubuntu (14.04 trusty) and using Lyx2.2.0 (of 23.5.2016) > > > > Debian (GNU/Linux 8.4 (jessie) Release: 8.4) and using Lyx2.2.0 > > (of 23.5.2016) > > > > Wolfgang > > > ps > I compiled it from source With cmake or automake help? In case you used cmake, you could create a debian package. Installing and de-installing is easy in that case. Kornel signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On 31.05.2016 10:11, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? Wolfgang No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final 2.2.0 over rc1. Scott Thanks, Scott. How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) side by side How did you install them? What OS? Liviu Wolfgang Liviu, Scott: Kubuntu (14.04 trusty) and using Lyx2.2.0 (of 23.5.2016) Debian (GNU/Linux 8.4 (jessie) Release: 8.4) and using Lyx2.2.0 (of 23.5.2016) Wolfgang ps I compiled it from source
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On 31.05.2016 10:06, Liviu Andronic wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? Wolfgang No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final 2.2.0 over rc1. Scott Thanks, Scott. How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) side by side How did you install them? What OS? Liviu Wolfgang Liviu, Scott: Kubuntu (14.04 trusty) and using Lyx2.2.0 (of 23.5.2016) Debian (GNU/Linux 8.4 (jessie) Release: 8.4) and using Lyx2.2.0 (of 23.5.2016) Wolfgang
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > Wolfgang > > No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final > 2.2.0 over rc1. > > Scott > > Thanks, Scott. > > How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) > side by side > How did you install them? What OS? Liviu > Wolfgang -- Do you think you know what math is? http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/ian-stewart-2013-08-02 Or what it means to be intelligent? http://www.ideasroadshow.com/issues/john-duncan-2013-08-30 Think again: http://www.ideasroadshow.com/library
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 09:10:17AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: > > On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > > > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > > > Wolfgang > > No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final > > 2.2.0 over rc1. > > > > Scott > > Thanks, Scott. > > How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) > side by side You're on Linux right? I'm not sure of the best way to remove it. We don't have an uninstall target (i.e. you can't do "make uninstall"). You could use something like checkinstall. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On 31.05.2016 08:58, Scott Kostyshak wrote: On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? Wolfgang No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final 2.2.0 over rc1. Scott Thanks, Scott. How do I effectively remove the rc1 lyx. I have it and 2.2.0 (myx lyx22) side by side Wolfgang
Re: lyx2.2.0rc1 and lyx2.2.0 identical?
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 08:53:06AM +0200, Wolfgang Engelmann wrote: > Are lyx2.2.0rc1 (11.4.16) and lyx2.2.0 (23.5.16) identical? > Wolfgang No they're significantly different. I highly recommend you use the final 2.2.0 over rc1. Scott signature.asc Description: PGP signature
