Re: paths in Fedora
Richard Heck wrote: LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect. Jürgen
Re: paths in Fedora
On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect. Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved to texlive a month or so ago rh
Re: paths in Fedora
Yes, thanks a lot. M El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:03 -0400, Richard Heck escribió: On 05/02/2011 09:14 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote: Dear all, I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, and I've noticed that in this latter distro .bst files are not where LyX looks for them. That is, they are not in usr/share/texmf-texlive/bibtex but, rather, in usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex. Texhash does not seem to make LyX more aware of the change. How should I enlighten LyX? I would have thought the path to .bst files was standard, btw... LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. I thought we had fixed this rh
Re: paths in Fedora
Richard Heck wrote: Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved to texlive a month or so ago The argument not to do so was that it can be too time consuming, so we do not want that on every reconfigure process, IIRC. Jürgen
Re: paths in Fedora
I admit I had assumed that was the standard behaviour... M El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:10 -0400, Richard Heck escribió: On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect. Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved to texlive a month or so ago rh
Re: paths in Fedora
On 05/02/2011 10:13 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved to texlive a month or so ago The argument not to do so was that it can be too time consuming, so we do not want that on every reconfigure process, IIRC. It's very fast here. Under a second, I'd say. rh
Re: paths in Fedora
On 05/02/2011 10:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: It's very fast here. Under a second, I'd say. Here (full TeXLive 2010 installation) it takes a bit longer, about 5-10 secs. IMHO even this would be bearable. Reconfigure takes a while, anyway. I'll raise the issue on devel once things are moving again. rh
Re: paths in Fedora
I agree that UNITY is junk, so I simply restarted in ubuntu classic (AKA gnome...) and all is fine. EK On 05/02/2011 02:32 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote: Natty crashed spectacularly twice -- the kind of crash that calls for a reinstall. Even if it had been rock-solid, which for me it has not been, I don't care much for Unity, as it is now. Manolo El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 14:20 -0400, Steve Litt escribió: On Monday 02 May 2011 09:14:32 Manolo Martínez wrote: Dear all, I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, Just curious: Why? This is the second time in two days hearing of people migrating away from Ubuntu. Thanks SteveT Steve Litt Recession Relief Package http://www.recession-relief.US Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt -- Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D. Jules and Doris Stein Research to Prevent BlindnessProfessor Director, Center of Excellence for Computational System neuroscience, The Friedman Brain Institute, MSSM Director, The laboratory of Visual Computational Neuroscience Depts. of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Chemical Structural Biology The Mount Sinai School of Medicine One Gustave Levy Place New York, NY, 10029
Re: paths in Fedora
Richard Heck wrote: LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect. Jürgen
Re: paths in Fedora
On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect. Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved to texlive a month or so ago rh
Re: paths in Fedora
Yes, thanks a lot. M El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:03 -0400, Richard Heck escribió: On 05/02/2011 09:14 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote: Dear all, I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, and I've noticed that in this latter distro .bst files are not where LyX looks for them. That is, they are not in usr/share/texmf-texlive/bibtex but, rather, in usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex. Texhash does not seem to make LyX more aware of the change. How should I enlighten LyX? I would have thought the path to .bst files was standard, btw... LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. I thought we had fixed this rh
Re: paths in Fedora
Richard Heck wrote: Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved to texlive a month or so ago The argument not to do so was that it can be too time consuming, so we do not want that on every reconfigure process, IIRC. Jürgen
Re: paths in Fedora
I admit I had assumed that was the standard behaviour... M El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:10 -0400, Richard Heck escribió: On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try ToolsTeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. Or the Recan button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect. Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved to texlive a month or so ago rh
Re: paths in Fedora
On 05/02/2011 10:13 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved to texlive a month or so ago The argument not to do so was that it can be too time consuming, so we do not want that on every reconfigure process, IIRC. It's very fast here. Under a second, I'd say. rh
Re: paths in Fedora
On 05/02/2011 10:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: Richard Heck wrote: It's very fast here. Under a second, I'd say. Here (full TeXLive 2010 installation) it takes a bit longer, about 5-10 secs. IMHO even this would be bearable. Reconfigure takes a while, anyway. I'll raise the issue on devel once things are moving again. rh
Re: paths in Fedora
I agree that UNITY is junk, so I simply restarted in ubuntu classic (AKA gnome...) and all is fine. EK On 05/02/2011 02:32 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote: Natty crashed spectacularly twice -- the kind of crash that calls for a reinstall. Even if it had been rock-solid, which for me it has not been, I don't care much for Unity, as it is now. Manolo El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 14:20 -0400, Steve Litt escribió: On Monday 02 May 2011 09:14:32 Manolo Martínez wrote: Dear all, I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, Just curious: Why? This is the second time in two days hearing of people migrating away from Ubuntu. Thanks SteveT Steve Litt Recession Relief Package http://www.recession-relief.US Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt -- Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D. Jules and Doris Stein Research to Prevent BlindnessProfessor Director, Center of Excellence for Computational System neuroscience, The Friedman Brain Institute, MSSM Director, The laboratory of Visual Computational Neuroscience Depts. of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Chemical Structural Biology The Mount Sinai School of Medicine One Gustave Levy Place New York, NY, 10029
Re: paths in Fedora
Richard Heck wrote: > LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try > Tools>TeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. Or the "Recan" button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect. Jürgen
Re: paths in Fedora
On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try >> Tools>TeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. > Or the "Recan" button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect. > Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved to texlive a month or so ago rh
Re: paths in Fedora
Yes, thanks a lot. M El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:03 -0400, Richard Heck escribió: > On 05/02/2011 09:14 AM, Manolo Martínez wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, and I've noticed that in this > > latter distro .bst files are not where LyX looks for them. That is, they > > are not in usr/share/texmf-texlive/bibtex but, rather, in > > usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/bibtex. Texhash does not seem to make LyX > > more aware of the change. > > > > How should I enlighten LyX? I would have thought the path to .bst files > > was standard, btw... > > > LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try > Tools>TeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. > > I thought we had fixed this > > rh >
Re: paths in Fedora
Richard Heck wrote: > Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to > find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, > but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved > to texlive a month or so ago The argument not to do so was that it can be too time consuming, so we do not want that on every reconfigure process, IIRC. Jürgen
Re: paths in Fedora
I admit I had assumed that was the standard behaviour... M El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 10:10 -0400, Richard Heck escribió: > On 05/02/2011 10:05 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > > Richard Heck wrote: > >> LyX uses kpsewhich to figure out where to look for these files. Try > >> Tools>TeX Information, and then hit the Rescan button. > > Or the "Recan" button in the BibTeX settings dialog, to the same effect. > > > Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to > find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, > but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved > to texlive a month or so ago > > rh >
Re: paths in Fedora
On 05/02/2011 10:13 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> Shouldn't we just rescan as part of reconfiguring? I was surprised to >> find we do not. It's nice to be able to rescan without reconfiguring, >> but I was shocked to find I still had the bst list from before I moved >> to texlive a month or so ago > The argument not to do so was that it can be too time consuming, so we do not > want that on every reconfigure process, IIRC. > It's very fast here. Under a second, I'd say. rh
Re: paths in Fedora
On 05/02/2011 10:48 AM, Jürgen Spitzmüller wrote: > Richard Heck wrote: >> It's very fast here. Under a second, I'd say. > Here (full TeXLive 2010 installation) it takes a bit longer, about 5-10 secs. > IMHO even this would be bearable. > Reconfigure takes a while, anyway. I'll raise the issue on devel once things are moving again. rh
Re: paths in Fedora
I agree that UNITY is junk, so I simply restarted in "ubuntu classic" (AKA gnome...) and all is fine. EK On 05/02/2011 02:32 PM, Manolo Martínez wrote: Natty crashed spectacularly twice -- the kind of crash that calls for a reinstall. Even if it had been rock-solid, which for me it has not been, I don't care much for Unity, as it is now. Manolo El lun, 02-05-2011 a las 14:20 -0400, Steve Litt escribió: On Monday 02 May 2011 09:14:32 Manolo Martínez wrote: Dear all, I've recently moved from Ubuntu to Fedora, Just curious: Why? This is the second time in two days hearing of people migrating away from Ubuntu. Thanks SteveT Steve Litt Recession Relief Package http://www.recession-relief.US Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/stevelitt -- Ehud Kaplan, Ph.D. Jules and Doris Stein Research to Prevent BlindnessProfessor Director, Center of Excellence for Computational & System neuroscience, The Friedman Brain Institute, MSSM Director, The laboratory of Visual & Computational Neuroscience Depts. of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, Chemical & Structural Biology The Mount Sinai School of Medicine One Gustave Levy Place New York, NY, 10029
