Re: solaris build problem
I == Robert Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I I second Gary Rays problem building lyx-1.1.6fix2 on solaris 7. I C++ Compiler: g++ I C++ Compiler flags: -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions I C Compiler: gcc I C Compiler flags: -O3 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=v9 I using the gcc version of 2.92.2 with all patches applied. sorry that's wrong... it should be version 2.95.2 :) /robert -- Systems Administrator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology
Re: solaris build problem
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Robert Andersson wrote: Hi all! I second Gary Rays problem building lyx-1.1.6fix2 on solaris 7. C++ Compiler: g++ C++ Compiler flags: -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions C Compiler: gcc C Compiler flags: -O3 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=v9 using the gcc version of 2.92.2 with all patches applied. anyone got binaries for solaris v9? :) Did you try using --with-included-string when configuring? Allan. (ARRae)
Re: solaris build problem
Allan, AR == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AR Did you try using --with-included-string when configuring? nope, but now I have :) --still the same problem :( any binaries for solaris v9 anyone? yours, /robert -- Systems Administrator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology
Re: solaris build problem
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:36:59 +1000 (GMT+1000) From: Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Robert Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: solaris build problem On Wed, 30 May 2001, Robert Andersson wrote: Hi all! I second Gary Rays problem building lyx-1.1.6fix2 on solaris 7. C++ Compiler: g++ C++ Compiler flags: -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions C Compiler: gcc C Compiler flags: -O3 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=v9 using the gcc version of 2.92.2 with all patches applied. anyone got binaries for solaris v9? :) Did you try using --with-included-string when configuring? A side reamrk: this was already needed with 1.1.6fix1. New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to restart from the distrib tar file). (Solaris 2.6) -- Jean-Pierre -- Jean-Pierre
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Pierre, JC == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JC New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 needed JC (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it afterwards failed JC even after distclean and I had to restart from the distrib tar JC file). huh... :( not even with distclean... ouch! it works now, thanks! /robert -- Systems Administrator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Pierre == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jean-Pierre New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 Jean-Pierre needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it Jean-Pierre afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to Jean-Pierre restart from the distrib tar file). Hmm, m4 should not be needed at all... Is autoconf re-run? Is it a fresh rarball or did you apply the patch? JMarc
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Jean-Pierre == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Jean-Pierre New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 | Jean-Pierre needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it | Jean-Pierre afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to | Jean-Pierre restart from the distrib tar file). | | Hmm, m4 should not be needed at all... Is autoconf re-run? Is it a | fresh rarball or did you apply the patch? Unfortunately m4 is needed... this the autogeneration of the sigc++ files that is playing tricks on us. Some automake magic should help here. -- Lgb
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Pierre == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jean-Pierre New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 Jean-Pierre needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it Jean-Pierre afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to Jean-Pierre restart from the distrib tar file). Hmm, m4 should not be needed at all... Is autoconf re-run? Is it a fresh rarball or did you apply the patch? JMarc Well, from the tarball. Here what happened (from my recall, I killed the logs when I came back to the tarball the second time): #./configure --with-version-suffix=1.1.6 --with-included-gettext --with-included-string # gmake Then error message about the -I syntax error with Solaris m4 (when running gmake in macros). Installing gnu m4 results in new compilation errors which remained even after gmake distclean and a fresh ./confgure Re-extraction from the tarball with gnu m4 compiles and install without error. Do you want me to try to reproduce it ? -- Jean-Pierre
Re: solaris build problem
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars Unfortunately m4 is needed... this the autogeneration of the Lars sigc++ files that is playing tricks on us. Some automake magic Lars should help here. You mean the generated files are not in the dist? JMarc
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars Unfortunately m4 is needed... this the autogeneration of the | Lars sigc++ files that is playing tricks on us. Some automake magic | Lars should help here. | | You mean the generated files are not in the dist? Yes... seems like that. Not excatly as intended... -- Lgb
Re: solaris build problem
I == Robert Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I I second Gary Rays problem building lyx-1.1.6fix2 on solaris 7. I C++ Compiler: g++ I C++ Compiler flags: -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions I C Compiler: gcc I C Compiler flags: -O3 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=v9 I using the gcc version of 2.92.2 with all patches applied. sorry that's wrong... it should be version 2.95.2 :) /robert -- Systems Administrator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology
Re: solaris build problem
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Robert Andersson wrote: Hi all! I second Gary Rays problem building lyx-1.1.6fix2 on solaris 7. C++ Compiler: g++ C++ Compiler flags: -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions C Compiler: gcc C Compiler flags: -O3 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=v9 using the gcc version of 2.92.2 with all patches applied. anyone got binaries for solaris v9? :) Did you try using --with-included-string when configuring? Allan. (ARRae)
Re: solaris build problem
Allan, AR == Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: AR Did you try using --with-included-string when configuring? nope, but now I have :) --still the same problem :( any binaries for solaris v9 anyone? yours, /robert -- Systems Administrator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology
Re: solaris build problem
Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:36:59 +1000 (GMT+1000) From: Allan Rae [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Robert Andersson [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: solaris build problem On Wed, 30 May 2001, Robert Andersson wrote: Hi all! I second Gary Rays problem building lyx-1.1.6fix2 on solaris 7. C++ Compiler: g++ C++ Compiler flags: -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions C Compiler: gcc C Compiler flags: -O3 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=v9 using the gcc version of 2.92.2 with all patches applied. anyone got binaries for solaris v9? :) Did you try using --with-included-string when configuring? A side reamrk: this was already needed with 1.1.6fix1. New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to restart from the distrib tar file). (Solaris 2.6) -- Jean-Pierre -- Jean-Pierre
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Pierre, JC == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: JC New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 needed JC (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it afterwards failed JC even after distclean and I had to restart from the distrib tar JC file). huh... :( not even with distclean... ouch! it works now, thanks! /robert -- Systems Administrator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Pierre == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jean-Pierre New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 Jean-Pierre needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it Jean-Pierre afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to Jean-Pierre restart from the distrib tar file). Hmm, m4 should not be needed at all... Is autoconf re-run? Is it a fresh rarball or did you apply the patch? JMarc
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Jean-Pierre == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Jean-Pierre New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 | Jean-Pierre needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it | Jean-Pierre afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to | Jean-Pierre restart from the distrib tar file). | | Hmm, m4 should not be needed at all... Is autoconf re-run? Is it a | fresh rarball or did you apply the patch? Unfortunately m4 is needed... this the autogeneration of the sigc++ files that is playing tricks on us. Some automake magic should help here. -- Lgb
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Pierre == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Jean-Pierre New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 Jean-Pierre needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it Jean-Pierre afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to Jean-Pierre restart from the distrib tar file). Hmm, m4 should not be needed at all... Is autoconf re-run? Is it a fresh rarball or did you apply the patch? JMarc Well, from the tarball. Here what happened (from my recall, I killed the logs when I came back to the tarball the second time): #./configure --with-version-suffix=1.1.6 --with-included-gettext --with-included-string # gmake Then error message about the -I syntax error with Solaris m4 (when running gmake in macros). Installing gnu m4 results in new compilation errors which remained even after gmake distclean and a fresh ./confgure Re-extraction from the tarball with gnu m4 compiles and install without error. Do you want me to try to reproduce it ? -- Jean-Pierre
Re: solaris build problem
Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Lars Unfortunately m4 is needed... this the autogeneration of the Lars sigc++ files that is playing tricks on us. Some automake magic Lars should help here. You mean the generated files are not in the dist? JMarc
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | Lars == Lars Gullik Bjønnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: | | Lars Unfortunately m4 is needed... this the autogeneration of the | Lars sigc++ files that is playing tricks on us. Some automake magic | Lars should help here. | | You mean the generated files are not in the dist? Yes... seems like that. Not excatly as intended... -- Lgb
Re: solaris build problem
> "I" == Robert Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: I> I second Gary Rays problem building lyx-1.1.6fix2 on solaris 7. I> C++ Compiler: g++ I> C++ Compiler flags: -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions I> C Compiler: gcc I> C Compiler flags: -O3 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=v9 I> using the gcc version of 2.92.2 with all patches applied. sorry that's wrong... it should be version 2.95.2 :) /robert -- Systems Administrator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology
Re: solaris build problem
On Wed, 30 May 2001, Robert Andersson wrote: > Hi all! > > I second Gary Rays problem building lyx-1.1.6fix2 on solaris 7. > > C++ Compiler: g++ > C++ Compiler flags: -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions > C Compiler: gcc > C Compiler flags: -O3 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=v9 > > using the gcc version of 2.92.2 with all patches applied. > > anyone got binaries for solaris v9? :) Did you try using --with-included-string when configuring? Allan. (ARRae)
Re: solaris build problem
Allan, > "AR" == Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: AR> Did you try using --with-included-string when configuring? nope, but now I have :) --still the same problem :( any binaries for solaris v9 anyone? yours, /robert -- Systems Administrator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology
Re: solaris build problem
>>Date: Wed, 30 May 2001 16:36:59 +1000 (GMT+1000) >>From: Allan Rae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>To: Robert Andersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>Subject: Re: solaris build problem >> >>On Wed, 30 May 2001, Robert Andersson wrote: >> >>> Hi all! >>> >>> I second Gary Rays problem building lyx-1.1.6fix2 on solaris 7. >>> >>> C++ Compiler: g++ >>> C++ Compiler flags: -g -O2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions >>> C Compiler: gcc >>> C Compiler flags: -O3 -mcpu=v8 -mtune=v9 >>> >>> using the gcc version of 2.92.2 with all patches applied. >>> >>> anyone got binaries for solaris v9? :) >> >>Did you try using --with-included-string when configuring? A side reamrk: this was already needed with 1.1.6fix1. New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to restart from the distrib tar file). (Solaris 2.6) -- Jean-Pierre -- Jean-Pierre
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Pierre, > "JC" == Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: JC> New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 needed JC> (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it afterwards failed JC> even after distclean and I had to restart from the distrib tar JC> file). huh... :( not even with distclean... ouch! it works now, thanks! /robert -- Systems Administrator Swedish National Graduate School of Language Technology
Re: solaris build problem
> "Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Jean-Pierre> New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 Jean-Pierre> needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it Jean-Pierre> afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to Jean-Pierre> restart from the distrib tar file). Hmm, m4 should not be needed at all... Is autoconf re-run? Is it a fresh rarball or did you apply the patch? JMarc
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Jean-Pierre> New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 | Jean-Pierre> needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it | Jean-Pierre> afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to | Jean-Pierre> restart from the distrib tar file). | | Hmm, m4 should not be needed at all... Is autoconf re-run? Is it a | fresh rarball or did you apply the patch? Unfortunately m4 is needed... this the autogeneration of the sigc++ files that is playing tricks on us. Some automake magic should help here. -- Lgb
Re: solaris build problem
>> >>> "Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>Jean-Pierre> New with fix2: compilation fails with Solaris m4, Gnu m4 >>Jean-Pierre> needed (and available BEFORE ./configure, adding it >>Jean-Pierre> afterwards failed even after distclean and I had to >>Jean-Pierre> restart from the distrib tar file). >> >>Hmm, m4 should not be needed at all... Is autoconf re-run? Is it a >>fresh rarball or did you apply the patch? >> >>JMarc Well, from the tarball. Here what happened (from my recall, I killed the logs when I came back to the tarball the second time): #./configure --with-version-suffix=1.1.6 --with-included-gettext --with-included-string # gmake Then error message about the -I syntax error with Solaris m4 (when running gmake in macros). Installing gnu m4 results in new compilation errors which remained even after gmake distclean and a fresh ./confgure Re-extraction from the tarball with gnu m4 compiles and install without error. Do you want me to try to reproduce it ? -- Jean-Pierre
Re: solaris build problem
> "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Lars> Unfortunately m4 is needed... this the autogeneration of the Lars> sigc++ files that is playing tricks on us. Some automake magic Lars> should help here. You mean the generated files are not in the dist? JMarc
Re: solaris build problem
Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | > "Lars" == Lars Gullik Bjønnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | | Lars> Unfortunately m4 is needed... this the autogeneration of the | Lars> sigc++ files that is playing tricks on us. Some automake magic | Lars> should help here. | | You mean the generated files are not in the dist? Yes... seems like that. Not excatly as intended... -- Lgb
