Am 16.08.20 um 13:54 schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann:
Am 16.08.20 um 10:12 schrieb Kornel Benko:
Am Sun, 16 Aug 2020 09:46:19 +0200
schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann <engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>:
Am 15.08.20 um 20:21 schrieb Kornel Benko:
Am Sat, 15 Aug 2020 20:16:14 +0200
schrieb Wolfgang Engelmann <engelm...@uni-tuebingen.de>:
Am 15.08.20 um 12:19 schrieb José Abílio Matos:
On Saturday, 15 August 2020 10.55.06 WEST Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> I am getting a long output with mostly yes, but also
no-answers, e.g.
> checking for package garamondx [garamondx]... no
> +checking for font garamondx-fonts [zgmr8r]... no
> or
> +checking for document class aapaper [aa]... no
> +checking for document class foils [foils]... no
> or
> +checking for document class scrlettr [scrlettr]... no
>
> (not only those, just some examples)
>
> Should there be no 'no's' in the output of the command?
Yes, this is a report of what was, or _not_, found in your computer.
You can see some of that information in "Help->LaTeX Configuration".
> > If you try to run that command in any other directory lyx
will create
>
> I am not sure what that means: Would it produce the no-outputs??
> Wolfgang
> p.s. I am using Debian bullseye and
> LyX Version 2.3.5.2
> (Thursday, June 25, 2020)
> Library directory: /usr/share/lyx/
> User directory: ~/.lyx/
> Qt Version (run-time): 5.14.2
> Qt Version (compile-time): 5.14.2
You can see the full report in ~/.lyx/configure.log
When the configure is run we only output the INFO lines to the
console,
the configure.log is more complete.
> Thanks, José
>
> Wolfgang
Do you still have problems running lyx?
I can use lyx, however there is a slight annoyance and I thought the
issue discussed here might cure it. If I get an error (e.g. with
uppertitleback and lowertitleback) and fix it, the error is still
mentioned in the output, although the pdf file is alright. This
happens
also, if I change the name of my lyx file ans save/use it. There might
be another reason, though.
Wolfgang
Regards,
You have to reconfigure again, because lyx uses cached list of
available latex files.
Kornel
I did this just now, but after reconfigure it still complains about
upper/lowertitleback
Wolfgang
Is this also your case?
https://www.komascript.de/node/191
Kornel
no, I do use komascript, but twosided
Wolfgang
my colleague Karl-Heinz found the reason for the complains of lyx about
upper- and lowertitleback. I had copied (long ago, so I had forgotten)
parts from the uppertitleback in the appendix, where it still was in
this mode instead of in standard. Changing it to standard solved the issue
Wolfgang
--
lyx-users mailing list
lyx-users@lists.lyx.org
http://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
