boldsymbo
Hello,
When one uses \boldsymbol in math mode, LyX provides the definition
in the preamble:
\newcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
Thix creates an error if you need the whole AMS stuff, because \boldsymbol
is defined there..
Shouldn't the instruction be rewritten
\renewcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
and more generally the same for other standard definition of lyx_sty.C ?
lyx-1.0.4 on Sun/Solaris2.6
--
Jean-Pierre
Re: boldsymbo
"Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Pierre Hello, When one uses \boldsymbol in math mode, LyX
Jean-Pierre provides the definition in the preamble:
Jean-Pierre \newcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
Jean-Pierre Thix creates an error if you need the whole AMS stuff,
Jean-Pierre because \boldsymbol is defined there.. Shouldn't the
Jean-Pierre instruction be rewritten
Jean-Pierre \renewcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}} and
Jean-Pierre more generally the same for other standard definition of
Jean-Pierre lyx_sty.C ?
Jean-Pierre lyx-1.0.4 on Sun/Solaris2.6
There is a check box in Layout-Document which is supposed to let you
say that you include amsmath.sty, if I remember correctly. This is of
course the best solution.
JMarc
boldsymbo
Hello,
When one uses \boldsymbol in math mode, LyX provides the definition
in the preamble:
\newcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
Thix creates an error if you need the whole AMS stuff, because \boldsymbol
is defined there..
Shouldn't the instruction be rewritten
\renewcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
and more generally the same for other standard definition of lyx_sty.C ?
lyx-1.0.4 on Sun/Solaris2.6
--
Jean-Pierre
Re: boldsymbo
"Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jean-Pierre Hello, When one uses \boldsymbol in math mode, LyX
Jean-Pierre provides the definition in the preamble:
Jean-Pierre \newcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
Jean-Pierre Thix creates an error if you need the whole AMS stuff,
Jean-Pierre because \boldsymbol is defined there.. Shouldn't the
Jean-Pierre instruction be rewritten
Jean-Pierre \renewcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}} and
Jean-Pierre more generally the same for other standard definition of
Jean-Pierre lyx_sty.C ?
Jean-Pierre lyx-1.0.4 on Sun/Solaris2.6
There is a check box in Layout-Document which is supposed to let you
say that you include amsmath.sty, if I remember correctly. This is of
course the best solution.
JMarc
boldsymbo
Hello,
When one uses \boldsymbol in math mode, LyX provides the definition
in the preamble:
\newcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
Thix creates an error if you need the whole AMS stuff, because \boldsymbol
is defined there..
Shouldn't the instruction be rewritten
\renewcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
and more generally the same for other standard definition of lyx_sty.C ?
lyx-1.0.4 on Sun/Solaris2.6
--
Jean-Pierre
Re: boldsymbo
> "Jean-Pierre" == Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jean-Pierre> Hello, When one uses \boldsymbol in math mode, LyX
Jean-Pierre> provides the definition in the preamble:
Jean-Pierre> \newcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}}
Jean-Pierre> Thix creates an error if you need the whole AMS stuff,
Jean-Pierre> because \boldsymbol is defined there.. Shouldn't the
Jean-Pierre> instruction be rewritten
Jean-Pierre> \renewcommand{\boldsymbol}[1]{\mbox{\boldmath $#1$}} and
Jean-Pierre> more generally the same for other standard definition of
Jean-Pierre> lyx_sty.C ?
Jean-Pierre> lyx-1.0.4 on Sun/Solaris2.6
There is a check box in Layout->Document which is supposed to let you
say that you include amsmath.sty, if I remember correctly. This is of
course the best solution.
JMarc
