Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
On Mon, 07 May 2007 18:44:56 -0400 "Paul A. Rubin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Micha Feigin wrote: > > Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, > > Yes (AFAIK). > > > or is there a lyx way? > > Haven't found one. Hypothetically it might be possible to cobble > together a layout file that dealt with this by having two author > environments (one for the last or sole author, one for any author other > than the last), but I think it would involve convincing LyX not to stick > a blank line (or bunch of blank lines) in the exported LaTeX file > between author fields, and I don't know how to do that, or even if it's > possible. > > You can, of course, bind a key combination to insert the \and in ERT. > The sequence to bind would be something like > I don't think that it's something worth doing considering this appears something like once per paper and once in while. It's just that I try to avoid ert hacks when a more appropriate solution exists (they are hard to maintain and debug) >command-sequence ert-insert;self-insert \and{}; > > /Paul >
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Micha Feigin wrote: Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, Yes (AFAIK). or is there a lyx way? Haven't found one. Hypothetically it might be possible to cobble together a layout file that dealt with this by having two author environments (one for the last or sole author, one for any author other than the last), but I think it would involve convincing LyX not to stick a blank line (or bunch of blank lines) in the exported LaTeX file between author fields, and I don't know how to do that, or even if it's possible. You can, of course, bind a key combination to insert the \and in ERT. The sequence to bind would be something like command-sequence ert-insert;self-insert \and{}; /Paul
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Tim, I guess what Micha means is if you need to use \and in ERT to separate authors in the author environment of a document. The answer, AFAIK, is that it depends on the class. I think that if you have multiple authors, the best approach is to use a full ERT first page where you include the title, authors, addresses, abstract and keywords. Hope this helps. On 5/7/07, Tim Michelsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Micha Feigin schrieb: > Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there > a lyx way? If you are using Bibtex the just write Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU -- - Julio Rojas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Micha Feigin schrieb: Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? If you are using Bibtex the just write Meyer, Hans and Jong, YU
multiple authors (\and) is ert necessary
Is it necessary to use ert for \and when multiple authors are used, or is there a lyx way? Thanks