two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)
Dear list, I have a problem regarding the biblatex package, especially my package which builds on top of biblatex.[1] Attached is a .lyx file which shows the problem. If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be possible. However, LyX does not provide a second bibtex run, even though biblatex states in the log file that a second bibtex run is needed: ,--[ from the logfile ] ¦ LaTeX Warning: There were undefined references. ¦ ¦ Package biblatex Warning: Please (re)run BibTeX on the file(s): ¦ (biblatex)lyx-biblatex-xref.aux ¦ (biblatex)and rerun LaTeX afterwards. ` If I alter the .lyx file (e.g. add a space) and compile once more, everything is fine. But I hope there is a solution which does not need to have to compilation runs from inside LyX... Any help is appreciated. Regards, Dominik.- == [1] biblatex-dw, which is available from CTAN or from http://biblatex.dominik-wassenhoven.de/biblatex-dw.shtml?en -- lyx-biblatex-xref.lyx Description: Attached file: lyx-biblatex-xref.lyx
Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be possible. Read: would be necessary. If I alter the .lyx file (e.g. add a space) and compile once more, everything is fine. But I hope there is a solution which does not need to have to compilation runs from inside LyX... ^^ Read: to have two compilation runs. Regards, Dominik.-
Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: Any help is appreciated. A change in the source is needed in order to trigger this additional run. This is something that is doable for 1.6.1. Could you bugzilla it, please? Jürgen
two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)
Dear list, I have a problem regarding the biblatex package, especially my package which builds on top of biblatex.[1] Attached is a .lyx file which shows the problem. If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be possible. However, LyX does not provide a second bibtex run, even though biblatex states in the log file that a second bibtex run is needed: ,--[ from the logfile ] ¦ LaTeX Warning: There were undefined references. ¦ ¦ Package biblatex Warning: Please (re)run BibTeX on the file(s): ¦ (biblatex)lyx-biblatex-xref.aux ¦ (biblatex)and rerun LaTeX afterwards. ` If I alter the .lyx file (e.g. add a space) and compile once more, everything is fine. But I hope there is a solution which does not need to have to compilation runs from inside LyX... Any help is appreciated. Regards, Dominik.- == [1] biblatex-dw, which is available from CTAN or from http://biblatex.dominik-wassenhoven.de/biblatex-dw.shtml?en -- lyx-biblatex-xref.lyx Description: Attached file: lyx-biblatex-xref.lyx
Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be possible. Read: would be necessary. If I alter the .lyx file (e.g. add a space) and compile once more, everything is fine. But I hope there is a solution which does not need to have to compilation runs from inside LyX... ^^ Read: to have two compilation runs. Regards, Dominik.-
Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: Any help is appreciated. A change in the source is needed in order to trigger this additional run. This is something that is doable for 1.6.1. Could you bugzilla it, please? Jürgen
two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)
Dear list, I have a problem regarding the biblatex package, especially my package which builds on top of biblatex.[1] Attached is a .lyx file which shows the problem. If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be possible. However, LyX does not provide a second bibtex run, even though biblatex states in the log file that a second bibtex run is needed: ,--[ from the logfile ] ¦ LaTeX Warning: There were undefined references. ¦ ¦ Package biblatex Warning: Please (re)run BibTeX on the file(s): ¦ (biblatex)lyx-biblatex-xref.aux ¦ (biblatex)and rerun LaTeX afterwards. ` If I alter the .lyx file (e.g. add a space) and compile once more, everything is fine. But I hope there is a solution which does not need to have to compilation runs from inside LyX... Any help is appreciated. Regards, Dominik.- == [1] biblatex-dw, which is available from CTAN or from http://biblatex.dominik-wassenhoven.de/biblatex-dw.shtml?en -- lyx-biblatex-xref.lyx Description: Attached file: lyx-biblatex-xref.lyx
Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: > If I run this with LyX 1.6.0, I get an incomplete entry, > because the @collection entry is cited by the @incollection internally > and to resolve that @collection entry, a second bibtex run would be > possible. Read: would be necessary. > If I alter the .lyx file (e.g. add a space) and compile once more, > everything is fine. But I hope there is a solution which does not need > to have to compilation runs from inside LyX... ^^ Read: to have two compilation runs. Regards, Dominik.-
Re: two bibtex runs necessary (biblatex)
Dominik Waßenhoven wrote: > Any help is appreciated. A change in the source is needed in order to trigger this additional run. This is something that is doable for 1.6.1. Could you bugzilla it, please? Jürgen
