Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:42:15AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
Rodney Bates wrote:
I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two
(sometimes
more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all
contiguous
definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition",
with
one definition number.
insert a ctrl-space with the standard paragraph-style
No, this will generate too much space between the two definition paragraphs.
But you can put {} in latex mode (using standard paragraph), or as I mentioned
in another message, you can put a comment paragraph.
Or use a "%" sign in a latex paragraph.
Allan. (ARRae)
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:42:15AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
Rodney Bates wrote:
I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two
(sometimes
more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all
contiguous
definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition",
with
one definition number.
insert a ctrl-space with the standard paragraph-style
No, this will generate too much space between the two definition paragraphs.
But you can put {} in latex mode (using standard paragraph), or as I mentioned
in another message, you can put a comment paragraph.
Or use a "%" sign in a latex paragraph.
Allan. (ARRae)
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
On Fri, 19 Jan 2001, Dekel Tsur wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:42:15AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> > Rodney Bates wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two
> > > > (sometimes
> > > > more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all
> > > > contiguous
> > > > definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition",
> > > > with
> > > > one definition number.
> >
> > insert a ctrl-space with the standard paragraph-style
>
> No, this will generate too much space between the two definition paragraphs.
> But you can put {} in latex mode (using standard paragraph), or as I mentioned
> in another message, you can put a comment paragraph.
Or use a "%" sign in a latex paragraph.
Allan. (ARRae)
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
Rodney Bates wrote: I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two (sometimes more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all contiguous definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition", with one definition number. insert a ctrl-space with the standard paragraph-style HErbert
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:46:33PM -0600, Rodney Bates wrote: I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two (sometimes more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all contiguous definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition", with one definition number. The only way I have gotten two of them is to put a standard paragraph in between, but I have no content for it, so I put the name of the thing being defined in the definition paragraph and its actual definition in subsequent stardard paragraphs. I greatly doubt this is the way it was intended. How do I do this the right way. This is a limitation of LyX (we have plans to remove it, of course). Currently, you need to put a "Comment" paragraph between any two consecutive Definition paragraphs.
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:42:15AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
Rodney Bates wrote:
I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two
(sometimes
more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all
contiguous
definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition",
with
one definition number.
insert a ctrl-space with the standard paragraph-style
No, this will generate too much space between the two definition paragraphs.
But you can put {} in latex mode (using standard paragraph), or as I mentioned
in another message, you can put a comment paragraph.
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
Rodney Bates wrote: I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two (sometimes more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all contiguous definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition", with one definition number. insert a ctrl-space with the standard paragraph-style HErbert
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:46:33PM -0600, Rodney Bates wrote: I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two (sometimes more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all contiguous definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition", with one definition number. The only way I have gotten two of them is to put a standard paragraph in between, but I have no content for it, so I put the name of the thing being defined in the definition paragraph and its actual definition in subsequent stardard paragraphs. I greatly doubt this is the way it was intended. How do I do this the right way. This is a limitation of LyX (we have plans to remove it, of course). Currently, you need to put a "Comment" paragraph between any two consecutive Definition paragraphs.
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:42:15AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
Rodney Bates wrote:
I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two
(sometimes
more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all
contiguous
definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition",
with
one definition number.
insert a ctrl-space with the standard paragraph-style
No, this will generate too much space between the two definition paragraphs.
But you can put {} in latex mode (using standard paragraph), or as I mentioned
in another message, you can put a comment paragraph.
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
> Rodney Bates wrote: > > > > I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two > > (sometimes > > more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all > > contiguous > > definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition", > > with > > one definition number. insert a ctrl-space with the standard paragraph-style HErbert
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
On Thu, Jan 18, 2001 at 01:46:33PM -0600, Rodney Bates wrote: > I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two > (sometimes > more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all > contiguous > definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition", > with > one definition number. The only way I have gotten two of them is to put > a standard paragraph in between, but I have no content for it, so I put > the name of the thing being defined in the definition paragraph and its > actual definition in subsequent stardard paragraphs. I greatly doubt > this is the way it was intended. How do I do this the right way. This is a limitation of LyX (we have plans to remove it, of course). Currently, you need to put a "Comment" paragraph between any two consecutive Definition paragraphs.
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:42:15AM +0100, Herbert Voss wrote:
> Rodney Bates wrote:
> > >
> > > I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two
> > > (sometimes
> > > more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all
> > > contiguous
> > > definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition",
> > > with
> > > one definition number.
>
> insert a ctrl-space with the standard paragraph-style
No, this will generate too much space between the two definition paragraphs.
But you can put {} in latex mode (using standard paragraph), or as I mentioned
in another message, you can put a comment paragraph.
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
Rodney Bates wrote:
I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two
(sometimes
more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all
contiguous
definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition",
with
one definition number.
I guess this is because it is not very appropiate to put several
definition paragraphs together, you can check mathematical books in
which after a definition follows a standard paragraph, a remark, a
proposition or whatever except another definition.
Moreover if you want to define several items you can use inside the
definition paragrah an enumerate environment (see the attached file
below)
Another possibility coul be to play with the Definition Style or more
precisely with the Theorem Style in amsmaths.inc. I didn't find a way to
avoid this behavior modifying some of the tags in the style definition
but perhaps another person in the list could help you in this way.
The only way I have gotten two of them is to put
a standard paragraph in between, but I have no content for it, so I put
the name of the thing being defined in the definition paragraph and its
actual definition in subsequent stardard paragraphs. I greatly doubt
this is the way it was intended. How do I do this the right way.
I am using lyx 1.1.5fix1, environment article(AMS)
Hope it helps
--
http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar
"We'll look into it":
By the time the wheels make a full turn, we
assume you will have forgotten about it, too.
#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 2.16
\textclass amsart
\language english
\inputencoding default
\fontscheme default
\graphics default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single
\papersize Default
\paperpackage widemarginsa4
\use_geometry 0
\use_amsmath 1
\paperorientation portrait
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\layout Section
First section
\layout Definition
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first}
\end_inset
This is the introduction to several definitions
\begin_deeper
\layout Enumerate
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first_one}
\end_inset
This the very first definition
\layout Enumerate
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first_two}
\end_inset
This the second one
\layout Enumerate
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first_third}
\end_inset
and finally the third one.
\end_deeper
\layout Standard
Now you can play with labels in the following way.
As you can see in definiton
\begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{def:first}
\end_inset
.(
\begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{def:first_third}
\end_inset
) Perhaps you can find more optimized solutions by using prettyref package.
\the_end
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
Rodney Bates wrote:
I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two
(sometimes
more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all
contiguous
definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition",
with
one definition number.
I guess this is because it is not very appropiate to put several
definition paragraphs together, you can check mathematical books in
which after a definition follows a standard paragraph, a remark, a
proposition or whatever except another definition.
Moreover if you want to define several items you can use inside the
definition paragrah an enumerate environment (see the attached file
below)
Another possibility coul be to play with the Definition Style or more
precisely with the Theorem Style in amsmaths.inc. I didn't find a way to
avoid this behavior modifying some of the tags in the style definition
but perhaps another person in the list could help you in this way.
The only way I have gotten two of them is to put
a standard paragraph in between, but I have no content for it, so I put
the name of the thing being defined in the definition paragraph and its
actual definition in subsequent stardard paragraphs. I greatly doubt
this is the way it was intended. How do I do this the right way.
I am using lyx 1.1.5fix1, environment article(AMS)
Hope it helps
--
http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar
"We'll look into it":
By the time the wheels make a full turn, we
assume you will have forgotten about it, too.
#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 2.16
\textclass amsart
\language english
\inputencoding default
\fontscheme default
\graphics default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single
\papersize Default
\paperpackage widemarginsa4
\use_geometry 0
\use_amsmath 1
\paperorientation portrait
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\layout Section
First section
\layout Definition
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first}
\end_inset
This is the introduction to several definitions
\begin_deeper
\layout Enumerate
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first_one}
\end_inset
This the very first definition
\layout Enumerate
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first_two}
\end_inset
This the second one
\layout Enumerate
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first_third}
\end_inset
and finally the third one.
\end_deeper
\layout Standard
Now you can play with labels in the following way.
As you can see in definiton
\begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{def:first}
\end_inset
.(
\begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{def:first_third}
\end_inset
) Perhaps you can find more optimized solutions by using prettyref package.
\the_end
Re: two definitions in a row, article(AMS), 1.1.5fix1
Rodney Bates wrote:
>
> I am just learning lyx for the first time on a paper. I want two
> (sometimes
> more) Definitions in a row. The definition environment puts all
> contiguous
> definition paragraphs under one occurrence of the label "definition",
> with
> one definition number.
I guess this is because it is not very appropiate to put several
definition paragraphs together, you can check mathematical books in
which after a definition follows a standard paragraph, a remark, a
proposition or whatever except another definition.
Moreover if you want to define several items you can use inside the
definition paragrah an enumerate environment (see the attached file
below)
Another possibility coul be to play with the Definition Style or more
precisely with the Theorem Style in amsmaths.inc. I didn't find a way to
avoid this behavior modifying some of the tags in the style definition
but perhaps another person in the list could help you in this way.
>The only way I have gotten two of them is to put
> a standard paragraph in between, but I have no content for it, so I put
> the name of the thing being defined in the definition paragraph and its
> actual definition in subsequent stardard paragraphs. I greatly doubt
> this is the way it was intended. How do I do this the right way.
>
> I am using lyx 1.1.5fix1, environment article(AMS)
Hope it helps
--
http://www.iit.upco.es/~oscar
"We'll look into it":
By the time the wheels make a full turn, we
assume you will have forgotten about it, too.
#LyX 1.1 created this file. For more info see http://www.lyx.org/
\lyxformat 2.16
\textclass amsart
\language english
\inputencoding default
\fontscheme default
\graphics default
\paperfontsize default
\spacing single
\papersize Default
\paperpackage widemarginsa4
\use_geometry 0
\use_amsmath 1
\paperorientation portrait
\secnumdepth 3
\tocdepth 3
\paragraph_separation indent
\defskip medskip
\quotes_language english
\quotes_times 2
\papercolumns 1
\papersides 1
\paperpagestyle default
\layout Section
First section
\layout Definition
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first}
\end_inset
This is the introduction to several definitions
\begin_deeper
\layout Enumerate
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first_one}
\end_inset
This the very first definition
\layout Enumerate
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first_two}
\end_inset
This the second one
\layout Enumerate
\begin_inset LatexCommand \label{def:first_third}
\end_inset
and finally the third one.
\end_deeper
\layout Standard
Now you can play with labels in the following way.
As you can see in definiton
\begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{def:first}
\end_inset
.(
\begin_inset LatexCommand \ref{def:first_third}
\end_inset
) Perhaps you can find more optimized solutions by using prettyref package.
\the_end
