RE: [Machinekit] BBB Machinekit setup.sh differences

2021-04-21 Thread John Dammeyer
Thank you.  The HAL file does a 
loadusr -w ./setup.sh

So I'm going to guess standard linux text based shell script 
sudo $(which config-pin) -f - <<- EOF
P8.07   out # gpio2.2   DB25-1  Enable System
...

When I tried 
sudo $(which config-pin) P8.07 out

manually from the terminal it didn't work with "cannot read file P8.07".  It 
wasn't until I got this email that I realized I'd done a puTTY into the wrong 
beagle and tried it on one that wasn't running machinekit.

John

> -Original Message-
> From: machinekit@googlegroups.com [mailto:machinekit@googlegroups.com] On 
> Behalf Of Charles Steinkuehler
> Sent: April-21-21 4:57 AM
> To: John Dammeyer; machinekit@googlegroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Machinekit] BBB Machinekit setup.sh differences
> 
> On 4/20/2021 12:12 PM, John Dammeyer wrote:
> > I was looking at what is in my mill setup.sh and what is in a setup.sh 
> > Frederic Ribble sent me for his lathe on the BBB.  Notice one
> uses P8.12 and the other P8_12
> >
> > P8.12   out # gpio1.12 X_Step
> >
> > P8_12   out # X Step / DB25.2
> >
> > I suspect either will work but is there a preferred method?  Searching with 
> > "BBB setup.sh machinekit" doesn't provide any hits that
> make sense.  Like this one was 2018.  Is it too old or too new?
> > https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit/issues/1310
> >
> > Should I care?
> 
> The issue is whether you're running the shell script version of
> config-pin, or the newer compiled version.  The shell script was written
> to be pretty forgiving of pin number syntax and will accept a 2 or 3
> digit numeric value, optionally prefixed by "p" or "P", and with an
> optional separator (any non-numeric character) between the first digit
> and any remaining digits.  Two digit values are assumed to have an
> implicit zero in the pin number (eg: 82 -> P8_02).
> 
> I believe the compiled version of config-pin is somewhat more picky
> about naming conventions, but I haven't used it much.
> 
> --
> Charles Steinkuehler
> char...@steinkuehler.net
> 
> --
> website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
> https://github.com/machinekit
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Machinekit" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to machinekit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/1797068e-ac3b-5644-57dd-
> c010f03d0698%40steinkuehler.net.

-- 
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
https://github.com/machinekit
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Machinekit" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to machinekit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/035b01d736ca%24b36cbaa0%241a462fe0%24%40autoartisans.com.


Re: [Machinekit] BBB Machinekit setup.sh differences

2021-04-21 Thread Charles Steinkuehler

On 4/20/2021 12:12 PM, John Dammeyer wrote:

I was looking at what is in my mill setup.sh and what is in a setup.sh Frederic 
Ribble sent me for his lathe on the BBB.  Notice one uses P8.12 and the other 
P8_12

P8.12   out # gpio1.12 X_Step

P8_12   out # X Step / DB25.2

I suspect either will work but is there a preferred method?  Searching with "BBB 
setup.sh machinekit" doesn't provide any hits that make sense.  Like this one was 
2018.  Is it too old or too new?
https://github.com/machinekit/machinekit/issues/1310

Should I care?


The issue is whether you're running the shell script version of 
config-pin, or the newer compiled version.  The shell script was written 
to be pretty forgiving of pin number syntax and will accept a 2 or 3 
digit numeric value, optionally prefixed by "p" or "P", and with an 
optional separator (any non-numeric character) between the first digit 
and any remaining digits.  Two digit values are assumed to have an 
implicit zero in the pin number (eg: 82 -> P8_02).


I believe the compiled version of config-pin is somewhat more picky 
about naming conventions, but I haven't used it much.


--
Charles Steinkuehler
char...@steinkuehler.net

--
website: http://www.machinekit.io blog: http://blog.machinekit.io github: 
https://github.com/machinekit
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Machinekit" group.

To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to machinekit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/machinekit/1797068e-ac3b-5644-57dd-c010f03d0698%40steinkuehler.net.