Re: Time Machine thinning

2013-03-30 Thread Stefano Mori

On 30 Mar 2013, at 00:25, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:

 Thin != delete. Thinning is removing the entries from the database, as I 
 recall.

Ah!

Reason I ask is I do backups with rsync's --link-dest option, which I like, but 
there's the problem of deleting the oldest timestamps, as it takes a while...

Any way to bend the laws of physics?


Stefano


___
MacOSX-talk mailing list
MacOSX-talk@omnigroup.com
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk


Re: Time Machine thinning

2013-03-30 Thread Arno Hautala
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Stefano Mori stefano.m...@zen.co.uk wrote:

 On 30 Mar 2013, at 00:25, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:

 Thin != delete. Thinning is removing the entries from the database, as I 
 recall.

In this case, thin does equal delete.

For example:

 Mar 30 13:20:50 shindig com.apple.backupd[54602]: Starting post-backup 
 thinning
 Mar 30 13:23:01 shindig com.apple.backupd[54602]: Deleted /Volumes/Backup of 
 shindig/Backups.backupdb/shindig/2013-02-28-002627 (156.7 MB)
 Mar 30 13:23:39 shindig com.apple.backupd[54602]: Deleted /Volumes/Backup of 
 shindig/Backups.backupdb/shindig/2013-03-28-233100 (68.5 MB)
 Mar 30 13:24:11 shindig com.apple.backupd[54602]: Deleted /Volumes/Backup of 
 shindig/Backups.backupdb/shindig/2013-03-28-223255 (64.1 MB)
 Mar 30 13:24:56 shindig com.apple.backupd[54602]: Deleted /Volumes/Backup of 
 shindig/Backups.backupdb/shindig/2013-03-28-221436 (69.4 MB)
 Mar 30 13:25:36 shindig com.apple.backupd[54602]: Deleted /Volumes/Backup of 
 shindig/Backups.backupdb/shindig/2013-03-28-204147 (29 MB)
 Mar 30 13:25:36 shindig com.apple.backupd[54602]: Post-back up thinning 
 complete: 5 expired backups removed
 Mar 30 13:25:44 shindig com.apple.backupd[54602]: Backup completed 
 successfully.

Further, TimeMachine does need to delete the actual files to free up
more space. My guess is that it's quick because many of the items to
delete will be hard linked directories, which should dramatically
bring down the number of files to delete. rsync can only hard link
files, so there's going to be much more to remove.

 Reason I ask is I do backups with rsync's --link-dest option, which I like, 
 but there's the problem of deleting the oldest timestamps, as it takes a 
 while...

 Any way to bend the laws of physics?

My email backup (from offlineimap) contains several tens of thousands
of files and really slowed down TimeMachine (every backup had to check
every file to determine which were new in the directory). So I
switched to rsnapshot, which handled the many files much faster, but
still wasn't exactly speedy. Now I just rsync directly to the backup
location (running on FreeNAS) and rely on ZFS snapshots to quickly
make and prune old backups.

Apple really should have just executed on their ZFS project.

--
arno  s  hautala/-|   a...@alum.wpi.edu

pgp b2c9d448
___
MacOSX-talk mailing list
MacOSX-talk@omnigroup.com
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk


Re: 2-factor auth for iTunes/Apple ID?

2013-03-30 Thread Ashley Aitken

On 30/03/2013, at 8:24 AM, LuKreme krem...@kreme.com wrote:

 Basically, it's designed to be as least annoying as it can possibly be.

And three cheers for that!

Cheers,
AShley.

--
Ashley Aitken
Perth, Western Australia (GMT + 8hrs!)
Social (Facebook, Twitter, Skype etc.): MrHatken 
Professional (LinkedIn, Twitter, Skype etc.): AshleyAitken


___
MacOSX-talk mailing list
MacOSX-talk@omnigroup.com
http://www.omnigroup.com/mailman/listinfo/macosx-talk