Re: [119488] trunk/dports/kde

2014-04-27 Thread Ryan Schmidt

On Apr 27, 2014, at 05:20, m...@macports.org wrote:

> Revision
> 119488
> Author
> m...@macports.org
> Date
> 2014-04-27 03:20:14 -0700 (Sun, 27 Apr 2014)
> Log Message
> 
> rkward: new ports for RKWard (ticket #32837)
> Added Paths
> 
>   • trunk/dports/kde/rkward/
>   • trunk/dports/kde/rkward/Portfile
> Diff
> 
> Added: trunk/dports/kde/rkward/Portfile (0 => 119488)
> 
> --- trunk/dports/kde/rkward/Portfile  (rev 0)
> +++ trunk/dports/kde/rkward/Portfile  2014-04-27 10:20:14 UTC (rev 119488)
> 
> @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@
> 
> +# -*- coding: utf-8; mode: tcl; tab-width: 4; indent-tabs-mode: nil; 
> c-basic-offset: 4 -*- vim:fenc=utf-8:ft=tcl:et:sw=4:ts=4:sts=4
> +# $Id$
> +
> +PortSystem  1.0
> +fetch.type  svn
> +svn.url 
> http://svn.code.sf.net/p/rkward/code/branches/release_branches/rkward_0.6.1

You should not need to repeat the version number multiple times in the portfile 
(http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Don't_repeat_yourself). Declare it once, in the 
version variable, then use that variable’s value anywhere else that you need 
the value.

> +svn.revision4635
> +worksrcdir  ${workpath}/rkward_0.6.1

This value is incorrect. worksrcdir is supposed to be a path relative to 
workpath, not an absolute path. Either set worksrcdir to ${name}_${version} 
(preferred), or set worksrcpath to ${workpath}/${name}_${version} (equivalent 
but more verbose).


> +namerkward
> +conflicts   rkward-devel
> +version 0.6.1
> +categories  kde kde4 math science
> +maintainers hhu.de:meik.michalke
> +license GPL-2
> +platforms   darwin
> +
> +description KDE frontend to the R statistics language
> +
> +long_descriptionRKWard aims to become an easy to use, transparent 
> frontend to R, a powerful system \
> +for statistical computation and graphics. Besides a 
> convenient GUI for the most important \
> +statistical functions, future versions will also provide 
> seamless integration with an office-suite.
> +
> +homepagehttp://rkward.sourceforge.net
> 
> +
> +master_sites
> https://sourceforge.net/projects/rkward/files/Current_Stable_Releases

Shouldn’t this be using the sourceforge fetch group? Actually, if you’re 
fetching from svn instead, then the master_sites line isn’t used at all and can 
be removed. But if you can fetch from a tarball instead of from svn that would 
be preferable.


> +PortGroup   cmake 1.0

Portgroup are conventionally declared directly following the PortSystem line.


> +depends_lib port:kdelibs4 \
> +port:kate \
> +port:R
> +
> +# add port:okular once the graphics device is fully functional
> +# this needs port:poppler with +qt4 +quartz varaints which cannot be
> +# specified with depends_lib-append
> +variant okular description {Add okular for nice PDF handling} {
> +depends_lib-append port:okular
> +}

A variant that does nothing more than add a dependency is usually wrong. You 
need to also tell the build system to use the dependency. Or, if the build 
system uses the dependency automatically if present, then you need to inform 
the build system *not* to use the dependency if the variant is *not* selected.

> +if {${configure.compiler} == "clang"} {
> +# force the use of gcc 4.7 to be able to link with R-framework
> +depends_lib-append   port:gcc47
> +configure.compiler   macports-gcc-4.7
> +configure.objc   /usr/bin/gcc
> +configure.env-append "OBJCXX=${configure.objc}"
> +}

This looks very wrong and makes me very uncomfortable. Why is the MacPorts 
chosen default compiler (usually clang, these days) not satisfactory? If you’re 
trying to match the compiler selection of the R port, then add all the code the 
R port contains for adding compiler variants, and use the active_variants 1.1 
port to ensure they match. However, note that the R port is only using the 
compiler variants to select the fortran compiler; it’s using the standard 
MacPorts-selected C/C++ and ObjectiveC/C++ compilers, so this port should too, 
and if this port does not need a fortran compiler, then the compiler variants 
are wholly unnecessary.

> +post-extract {
> +# creates the build dir if it doesn't exist
> +# this won't return errors if directory is already there
> +file mkdir ${worksrcdir}/build
> +}

These comments seem unnecessary and just slow down whoever’s reading the code, 
who will already know what “file mkdir” does since it’s in the documentation 
for “file mkdir”.

> +configure.dir   ${worksrcdir}/build

This should be ${worksrcpath}/build

> +configure.args-append \
> +-DNO_R_XML=1 \
> +-DRKVERSION_NUMBER=${version} \
> +-DBUNDLE_INSTALL_DIR=${applications_dir} \
> +-DR_EXECUTABLE=${prefix}/Library/Frameworks/R.framework/Resource

Fwd: Buildbots offline?

2014-04-27 Thread Jeremy Lavergne


Begin forwarded message:

> From: Craig Treleaven 
> Subject: Buildbots offline?
> Date: April 27, 2014 at 20:40:09 EDT
> To: macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
> 
> For about 24 hours, I get a 503 "Service Temporarily Unavailable" message 
> trying to access https://build.macports.org/
> 
> Craig
> ___
> macports-dev mailing list
> macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev

___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev


Buildbots offline?

2014-04-27 Thread Craig Treleaven
For about 24 hours, I get a 503 "Service Temporarily Unavailable" 
message trying to access https://build.macports.org/


Craig
___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev


Re: Buildbots offline?

2014-04-27 Thread Shreeraj Karulkar
It is back up right now. 
Shree

On Apr 27, 2014, at 5:41 PM, Jeremy Lavergne  wrote:

> 
> 
> Begin forwarded message:
> 
>> From: Craig Treleaven 
>> Subject: Buildbots offline?
>> Date: April 27, 2014 at 20:40:09 EDT
>> To: macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
>> 
>> For about 24 hours, I get a 503 "Service Temporarily Unavailable" message 
>> trying to access https://build.macports.org/
>> 
>> Craig
>> ___
>> macports-dev mailing list
>> macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
>> https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev
> 

___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev


Re: [119485] users/devans/dports

2014-04-27 Thread Ryan Schmidt
On Apr 27, 2014, at 04:18, dev...@macports.org wrote:

> Revision
> 119485
> Author
> dev...@macports.org
> Date
> 2014-04-27 02:18:53 -0700 (Sun, 27 Apr 2014)
> Log Message
> 
> devans/dports: add submitted port mpv for testing (#40844).
> Added Paths
> 
>   • users/devans/dports/multimedia/
>   • users/devans/dports/multimedia/mpv/
>   • users/devans/dports/multimedia/mpv/Portfile
>   • users/devans/dports/multimedia/mpv/files/
>   • users/devans/dports/multimedia/mpv/files/patch_py32-docutils.diff
> Diff
> 
> Added: users/devans/dports/multimedia/mpv/Portfile (0 => 119485)


> +# TODO: switch that to openal-soft? Leave it as-is?
> +variant openal description {Enable OpenAL support} {
> +depends_lib-append  port:openal
> +configure.args-replace  --disable-openal \
> +--enable-openal
> +}

If openal-soft will work, you should probably use that; openal-soft should 
probably replace openal.


___
macports-dev mailing list
macports-dev@lists.macosforge.org
https://lists.macosforge.org/mailman/listinfo/macports-dev